I know of plenty.
However, refusing to tolerate illegal immigration does not make one a “smorgasboard Catholic.” There is no infallibly-proclaimed teaching that requires us to tolerate illegal immigration.
So you are saying that Criminals. i.e., those fleeing poverty for their children, since defined by current law as criminals should, or at least theoretically could, be justifiably shot along with the other 50% that was definitely becoming gang members, since they would be criminals along with them?
Is that proportional justice? We don’t even prosecute wars using logic like that… Just war doctrine demands proportional use of force. A parents desire for the betterment of a child should not result in death unless that parent did something like harvest an organ or commit some other capital crime.
Then why not better their own country or at least follow the law of this one?
I’d like an answer to that. For most people, bettering their childrens’ lives does not include stealing from others, which is what living in and working in the US illegally does. It is stealing jobs, money, and social services that legal citizens deserve.
It is un-Catholic to advocate theft, a sin, as a method to better one’s life.
On a side note would an “devoted actual Catholic”, by your standards have to follow church doctrine, or can they pick and choose what they want to believe?
Church doctrine - which does not and never has included toleration of illegal immigration.
… or is that label just for those that don’t drink your brand of Kool-Aid? I imagine I am included in your sweeping judgment since I am a “Modern White”…
Yes, you fit the bill quite well.
As for my “brand of Kool-Aid”, my views were once the majority, and still resonate with the majority of people once politically-correct fears and programming are breached.
I actually totally abhor quotas and other legal discrimination based on race. Martin Luther King junior did not want quota’s based on race…
MLK was a communist, so bringing up his name doesn’t win you bonus points with me.
It’s good that you oppose such quotas. Now, be consistent and agree that Americans are not under any obligation to apply a mentality of freebies and subservience to illegal aliens and their invasion of this country.
With regards to immigration, reading your above, I assume and please correct me if I am wrong, that you would exclude members of your family and others from wherever your ancestors native land is from coming. …/quote]
Of course I am excluding members of my own family. They came here legally, did whatever the law required to become citizens, learned and spoke English in public and did not demand that the general population accept their language alongside English and accommodate them. Nor did they contribute vast amounts of crime in neighborhoods they intentionally ruined.
Proving the hire of illegal aliens can be done; if we can solve crimes that have happened decades ago, we can solve this. I fully agree with penalizing such companies.
NEWCATHOLICJEFF;6398851:
What I am more concerned with is denying health care to any Child when you and I are allowing, and even encouraging their parents to come to pick our fruit, …
Hold on, buckaroo.
I am not encouraging nor in support of illegals coming to pick my fruit. Accusing Americans of wanting illegal immigrant labor is a dirty tactic.
“Its not my fault the parents are poor”, and “You should thank me that I am giving these children jobs” and another. “It is sad though that some of them lose limbs in my factory, but I should not have to provide any [ompensation other then what was earned as it was clearly and an accident”.
Arrant nonsense. The very fact you make such sick assumptions says a lot about you.
… Israel has a nice wall…are we so stupid we cant build one, or is it that we really don’t want to?