Why Catholics Should Vote for Trump article

  • Thread starter Thread starter Limoncello4021
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If they don’t vote for Biden then it is not a vote for Biden.
 
Last edited:
If the person is prolife, it’s always a vote for Biden not to vote. No prolife person would vote for Biden.
It’s no more a vote for Biden than it is for Trump. If I did vote it would be for a third party. That results in no votes for either major party candidate. If I don’t vote, that results in no votes for either major party candidate. Either way it results in no votes for Biden. And I’m pro life.
 
Last edited:
If the person is prolife, it’s always a vote for Biden not to vote. No prolife person would vote for Biden.
Just curious how this works. Do they go house-to-house to every non voter (there’s over 100 million of them) and ask them if they are pro life or not and if the answer is yes, that adds one vote to Biden’s total?
 
Last edited:
Then failing to vote AGAINST Biden in an effective way is inconsistent with your moral system.
No. It’s inconsistent with your moral system. My moral system doesn’t require that I vote for a candidate who I can’t support.
 
Here’s one reason to vote for Trump…we have people in our own government that attempted to steal the vote from the American people by making false accusations to not only attempt to take the President out of office but also to sway the vote in the 2018 mid-terms. Keep paying attention to the news over the next month or so. More and more evidence coming to light…

`
The Real Russian
Swindle

Evidence dribbling out now indicates
“Trump Russian Collusion” was a politically designed
& media propelled fabrication. Relentlessly pushed &
fake, it interfered with voter opinion, likely delivering the House to
Democrats in the 2018 midterms. #sick
pic.twitter.com/DanQONkFvP

Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) July
24, 2020
`
 
Perhaps in your opinion since you don’t vote. For those who choose between the two candidates offered, the corruption and audacity shown by this scandal to discount the vote of the American people, may sway independents who are on the fence.
 
For those who choose between the two candidates offered,
See, that’s the problem. This shows how corrupt and twisted the system is. It appears that there are only two candidates offered when there are many. It’s rigged against anyone who is not a D or an R.
 
For those who choose between the two candidates offered, the corruption and audacity shown by this scandal to discount the vote of the American people, may sway independents who are on the fence.
They need an issue to care about first otherwise tampering doesn’t matter.
 
Last edited:
I would think that in a Constitutional Republic in which a representative is elected by the people to govern over them, according to the rules established in the law of the land, that that fact would be a very big issue to care about. What’s the point of voting if there is a group of corrupt players within the government working in cooperation with the major media outlets from which the people get their information, to overthrow an elected sitting President and/or steer public opinion with fabricated information? No matter what side of the aisle one is on, that bold and audacious theft that takes power out of the hands of the people by the appointed government officials who are supposed to fight corruption and uphold our laws, should give rise to righteous anger.

Edited to add…
otherwise tampering doesn’t matter.
No. This is not just some tampering. This is in fact treason and sedition.
 
Last edited:
Now, see, RuthAnne, here’s where you’re incorrect: The system isn’t “rigged” against someone who’s not D or R. Saying it’s “rigged” implies the outcome is fraudulent, i.e., the votes are 2000 for person x and 1000 for person y but the counters switch the numbers deliberately. I think sometimes that does occur in the US but rarely or on a small scale.

As it is, it’s just developed that most American politics are dominated by the D and R parties. The “alternatives” are like 1) Italy or countries like them, where there are like 30 political parties, all of whom have to constantly bargain with one another to get anything done; or 2) 1-party systems like China. So “it’s just developed this way” doesn’t really mean the system is “rigged,” it just means that the R & D parties have a lot of clout.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top