T
TULIPed
Guest
You’re right - as was every one of my teachers - I need to pay better attention. I was just curious. Carry on.
I thought it was Calvin who defined it. Are you insinuating that’s not a Calvinist doctrine?Apologies. How do you define “double predestination”?
This isn’t factual. Protestants may get advice from a pastor but they do not obey them. If a Protestant obeys themselves that is humanism. The central authority in Protestantism is God ie God’s Word vs the central authority of Catholicism is the Church ie Pope, bishops etc…Catholics and Orthodox willingly obey central Church authority. Bible Christians obey the self or their pastors
Exactly… the central authority of Catholicism is the Church ie Pope, bishops etc…
“But I have prayed for you, Simon, that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned back, strengthen your brothers.”
Nah - I just ran out of motivation tonight I suppose. Should’ve just let it lie. And with that, I shall retire. Good night.Why are Protestants so hesitant to define their own doctrines? Is it because you know that they don’t align with Scripture?
God established the Catholic Church. It’s been here in writing for 2000 years. Resources are voluminousWhat makes us different and what makes us right? Please cite sources if there’s any. Thank you and God Bless!
Ever see their disclaimer@De_Maria Post 48
I thought you might like to see Wikipedia’s usual gobbledygook when it comes to anything Catholic.
“Prevenient grace
…is a Christian theological concept rooted in Arminian theology, though it appeared earlier in Catholic theology. It is divine grace that precedes human decision. In other words, God will start showing love to that individual at a certain point in his lifetime.”
Wouldn’t you think the term is rooted in Catholicism if it appeared earlier in our theology? Unreal, but so typical for “Wackypedia.”
And this is where the question comes up. Even Trent, in chap 6 and Canon 18 of session 6, appears vague as to whether or not a person can keep the commandments, can be righteouss IOW, before they are justified. Since, as we know, the law cannot justify us, it cannot give us justice, cannot make us virtuous or righteous, cannot change us interiorly or give us “the strength, the grace of the Spirit, to fulfill it.” (CCC1963)As I remember it, you claimed that men could not keep the Ten Commandments before they are justified in Baptism. Romans 2:13 says that men must keep the Law, which is another way of saying the Ten Commandments, before God justifies them.
Trent Chapter VI says we are moved by God’s grace to seek justification. This means that we can keep the Commandments before justification with the help of God’s grace. In fact, we must.And this is where the question comes up. Even Trent, in chap 6
That says just the opposite:and Canon 18 of session 6, appears vague as to whether or not a person can keep the commandments, can be righteouss IOW, before they are justified.
That doesn’t say we can’t keep the Law. So, what’s your point in posting that part?Since, as we know, the law cannot justify us, it cannot give us justice, cannot make us virtuous or righteous, cannot change us interiorly or give us “the strength, the grace of the Spirit, to fulfill it.” (CCC1963)