Why do some Protestant churches prohibit the drinking of wine

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill_Pick
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I grew up in a fundamentalist church that to this day strongly opposes any use of alcohol. It never made any sense to me at all, especially in the light of stories in the Bible. A friend once told me that many people substitute personal feelings for sound religious doctrine. I think this is such a case.

Long before I crossed the Tiber, I was in a house that was under construction. There was a set of set of doors that appeared to be of a closet. The man opened the doors to show that they hid a bar, something he could conceal when people affiliated with his church were at the house. Such was the double life we led.

We were taught that the miracle of turning water into wine was really turning water into grape juice, never mind some other indicators in that story. It seemed to me that anything that could be fun was immediately suspect. Movies were all bad; television was evil; dancing was a path to Hell; rock music was of Satan, etc. Maybe it was something to give the elders power over the church members or maybe they really felt threatened by those things. I never had the gift of understanding the logic of making normal things evil. The abuse of those things, yes, but not moderation.
 
Sorry, but if you wrote or posted something in response to my post I didn’t get it. Could you please post it again?
Your post was stupid. We are scared we might like it? :rolleyes:
I have drank wine, I have drank just about everything they got here, yet I am a protestant…
 
How about an abortion clinic bombing Christian? Or a gay-killing Christian? Or a child molesting Christian?

We’re talking about doing what Jesus did, having a glass of wine (or beer), or two, or maybe even three with dinner and friends, or having a cocktail or two.

I am sure everyone agrees that drunkenness is a sin and some people cannot drink without getting to that point. Those people shouldn’t drink, but for those who can, there is nothing in the Bible saying that it is wrong for them to enjoy alcohol moderately.
AMEN
 
Your post was stupid. We are scared we might like it? :rolleyes:
I have drank wine, I have drank just about everything they got here, yet I am a protestant…
Very mature of you. I would go down to your level, but that WOULD make me “stupid”. All I was saying that some protestants who disagree with drinking may see it as a control issue. Things that people are unsure of, or un-learned in are scarey, therefore they try and control its existence or effects. I never said or implied anything about liking it. I’m a protestant too, and I enjoy a good drink, but I do know some who refuse it because of their fear of it. Any honest person knows that when some people fear things they try and control them. If that’s stupid, so be it,
 
Very mature of you. I would go down to your level, but that WOULD make me “stupid”. Coming from a 16 year, I will take that as a compliment. All I was saying that some protestants who disagree with drinking may see it as a control issue. Things that people are unsure of, or un-learned in are scarey, therefore they try and control its existence or effects. I never said or implied anything about liking it. I’m a protestant too, and I enjoy a good drink, but I do know some who refuse it because of their fear of it. Any honest person knows that when some people fear things they try and control them. If that’s stupid, so be it,
haha, be the better man :rolleyes:

I do not see what is so scary about drinking. Usually the worst that can happen is a terrible hangover, although I do know some choke to death after vomiting from a bad night.
 
haha, be the better man :rolleyes:

I do not see what is so scary about drinking. Usually the worst that can happen is a terrible hangover, although I do know some choke to death after vomiting from a bad night.
If I am pitted against you, I obviously won’t have to try. Why would you even want to say something like that in the first place? It’s ignorant and rude.

I never said there was anything bad with drinking. You obviously can’t read.
 
If I am pitted against you, I obviously won’t have to try. Why would you even want to say something like that in the first place? It’s ignorant and rude.

I never said there was anything bad with drinking. You obviously can’t read.
Say what?

Yes, I can’t read, thats why I love reading history books :rolleyes: .

Sorry, I am in a bad mood, and personally don’t care about being nice atm.
 
Say what?

Yes, I can’t read, thats why I love reading history books :rolleyes: .

Sorry, I am in a bad mood, and personally don’t care about being nice atm.
Well, if you read everything I wrote you would notice that I never said I disagreed with drinking. I was speaking about people who look at drinking as evil, and therefore act out of fear when it comes to drinking. Being in a bad mood is fine, but being rude to other people due to your state of mind isn’t called for. There are enough people on here who do that; we don’t need another one.
 
Well, if you read everything I wrote you would notice that I never said I disagreed with drinking. I was speaking about people who look at drinking as evil, and therefore act out of fear when it comes to drinking. Being in a bad mood is fine, but being rude to other people due to your state of mind isn’t called for. There are enough people on here who do that; we don’t need another one.
Being rude is a norm for some.

umk, end of discussion I’d guess.
 
The Presbyterian Church I grew up in used grape juice in lieu of wine in the Eucharist…I always found that odd, even as a child. Of course, they saw the Eucharist as merely symbolic, and did not take it regularly, for that matter. Hmmm.
Presbyterian’s don’t see it as merely symbolic though, Calvin talked of the spiritual presence. I suppose it depends on your denomination though
 
OK, well, in the Church I grew up in, we did not learn anything about the “spiritual presence” (is this another way of talking about the Real Presence? I have never heard this term), so no one else saw it as strange that we used grape juice, because it was taken to be merely symbolic. Maybe this is not what the Presbyterian Church teaches, but this was the answer I got from my church when I asked why they were serving us grape juice. 🤷
 
OK, well, in the Church I grew up in, we did not learn anything about the “spiritual presence” (is this another way of talking about the Real Presence? I have never heard this term), so no one else saw it as strange that we used grape juice, because it was taken to be merely symbolic. Maybe this is not what the Presbyterian Church teaches, but this was the answer I got from my church when I asked why they were serving us grape juice. 🤷
It’s not real presence and it’s not memorialism. Is a wikipedia article ok for you? I generally find wikipedia good for theological articles.
Here is the article showing calvin’s views:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_presence#Reformed_.28Calvinist.2C_Presbyterian.2C_most_United_churches.29_-.22Real_Presence.22_as.22pneumatic_presence.22

However, not all presbyterian churches believe the same thing. My denomination subscribes to the Westminster Confession of Faith.
 
It’s not real presence and it’s not memorialism. Is a wikipedia article ok for you? I generally find wikipedia good for theological articles.
Here is the article showing calvin’s views:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_presence#Reformed_.28Calvinist.2C_Presbyterian.2C_most_United_churches.29_-.22Real_Presence.22_as.22pneumatic_presence.22

However, not all presbyterian churches believe the same thing. My denomination subscribes to the Westminster Confession of Faith.
Ah, okay. Thanks for the information. I think why I never heard about this until now might be summed up in this bolded part from that wikipedia article:

"Some Protestant groups see Communion (also called the Lord’s Supper or the Lord’s Table) as merely a symbolic meal, a basic memorial of the Last Supper and the Passion, which is done by the ordinance of Jesus, but in which nothing miraculous occurs. This view is known as the Zwinglian view, after Huldrych Zwingli, a Swiss leader during the Reformation.

This perspective is commonly associated with Baptists and many other Evangelicals.** It is a perspective not uncommon “in the pews” (that is, among lay members) of some Reformed churches, even among those whose official doctrines are more in accord with the Calvinist spiritual real presence discussed above.** In the Anglican Communion, it is taught in the Diocese of Sydney, but rejected by most other Anglicans."

It is likely that my particular church was among those who perhaps did not believe or know that they were supposed to inform their laity of this “spiritual presence” business. This is the first I’ve heard of it, anyway.
 
How about an abortion clinic bombing Christian? Or a gay-killing Christian? Or a child molesting Christian?
How about putting horseshoes on Dalmations?

What on earth are you talking about - this is a thread about alcohol.
We’re talking about doing what Jesus did, having a glass of wine (or beer), or two, or maybe even three with dinner and friends, or having a cocktail or two.
I am sure everyone agrees that drunkenness is a sin and some people cannot drink without getting to that point. Those people shouldn’t drink, but for those who can, there is nothing in the Bible saying that it is wrong for them to enjoy alcohol moderately.
If you believe that Christ, the omnipotent God used to get a buzz on, okay, that’s what you believe. Myself - it seems not particularly Godlike.
 
We’re talking about doing what Jesus did, having a glass of wine (or beer), or two, or maybe even three with dinner and friends, or having a cocktail or two.
Besides which, the Bible is very clear that Jesus did not have a glass of wine. See Luke 1.
 
Besides which, the Bible is very clear that Jesus did not have a glass of wine. See Luke 1.
Luke 1 didn’t mention anything about wine. Wine is an integral part of the Passover Seder meal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top