G
guanophore
Guest
Psalm 50:10Puh-lease what type of prince owns live stock.
10 For every beast of the forest is mine,
the cattle on a thousand hills.
Psalm 50:10Puh-lease what type of prince owns live stock.
2425 The Church has rejected the totalitarian and atheistic ideologies associated in modem times with “communism” or “socialism.” She has likewise refused to accept, in the practice of “capitalism,” individualism and the absolute primacy of the law of the marketplace over human labor. Regulating the economy solely by centralized planning perverts the basis of social bonds; regulating it solely by the law of the marketplace fails social justice, for “there are many human needs which cannot be satisfied by the market.” Reasonable regulation of the marketplace and economic initiatives, in keeping with a just hierarchy of values and a view to the common good, is to be commended.
The Church doesn’t support capitalism or “survival of the fittest” at all.The inequalities and distortions of capitalist development are often an expression not only of economic liberalism but also of utilitarian thinking: that is, theoretical and practical approaches according to which what is useful for the individual leads to the good of the community. This saying has a core of truth, but it cannot be ignored that individual utility – even where it is legitimate – does not always favour the common good. In many cases a spirit of solidarity is called for that transcends personal utility for the good of the community.
If socialism and capitalism are two opposite ends, then a reasonable goal toward which to work would be a middle ground. Pope Francis seems to say that is what he wants us to work for; I’ll just make that statement in a vacuum. You mentioned Charles Darwin twice, which reminded me to recommend a book I recently read:As Catholics we are against socialism or communism. But we don’t seem to have any qualms about the idea of competing for our survival, a world where our well being is determined by having the best idea or out-competing the other guy. A guy can gain everything and a guy can literally lose everything and become homeless. Kind of like survival of the fittest. We have capitalism which seems to me to be a competition for the best way of life. .
Where ever you have a finite amount of some needed or desired resource there is going to be competition. That’s not a statement only about humans; that’s about life on earth in general. Socially we tend to organize in dominance hierarchies (common among social beings). Not everyone can be on top. If you want to be on top you must compete with the others that want to be there. You know that guy/girl that everyone finds so attractive? Only one person can be paired off with him/her ( kind of ). What the best seat at the high school graduation? So do others. Get there early to claim it first before your competition does.We have capitalism which seems to me to be a competition for the best way of life. .
Life itself is a competitive endeavor. Even if you didn’t live in a society at all and separated yourself from it you will still be competing with other life to sustain your existence.Why do we live in a competitive society?
I know Catholics who are happy to be Socialists .As Catholics we are against socialism
Just Loogled that (movie reference). Thank you for telling us all about something new. Unfortunately, now I have some more reading to do! It sounds good, though. BTW, good screen name for suggesting it.I have’t read all of the replies, but are you aware of Distributism?
Distributism was developed in the early and mid 20th Century as an alternative to Socialism and Communism. Of note, the founding inspiration for it was a Papal encyclical on economics published in the late 19th Century and all of the early proponents of it, such as Chesterton and Belloc, were Catholic.
Distributism took a pounding during World War Two as its proponents shelved it to support the war against the Nazis, and it never recovered. But we Distributist have never gone away and we’re still out there. Distributism is the economic theory of at least a couple of European political parties and one Australian one, and somewhat the theory of an American one.
Anyhow, there is competition if Distributism, but not of the same type that you note here.
But a Christ-like attitude doesn’t seem to leave much room for a Darwinian type system that literally results in the existence of a sub-class existing under the working class, and where the lowest of the working class do not fair much better than the sub-class.I agree with you. Competition is good, but we should approach with a Christ like attitude.