C
CaptainPrudeman
Guest
And so defeats Himself when He creates a soul He knows will deny Him.God certainly wants that all be saved (I have never denied that)
And so defeats Himself when He creates a soul He knows will deny Him.God certainly wants that all be saved (I have never denied that)
You cannot know God’s foreknowledge, therefore your argument is clearly wrong.I didn’t read the whole thread but the very end. It seems to me that the discussion about the fate of souls depends on God’s foreknowledge. God’s foreknowledge however does not exist. That is true since you can always do the opposite of God’s foreknowledge if you know the foreknowledge. How could you know the foreknowledge? Ask God.
Simply false. God has freely chosen to create souls with a free will, and He has always known that this would have represented a limitation to His omnipotence, because He has freely chosen not to save souls against their free will.Mmarco:
And so defeats Himself when He creates a soul He knows will deny Him.God certainly wants that all be saved (I have never denied that)
People who go to Heaven can know if they just ask it.You cannot know God’s foreknowledge, therefore your argument is clearly wrong.
God has always known everything eternally.
Nope, while the soul gets a choice, choosing to reject God still serves His purpose. How the wicked serve to refine the good is a perfect example. God is never “defeated.” Not by his own works, nor by poor reasoning.And so defeats Himself when He creates a soul He knows will deny Him.
People who are in heaven do always God’s will, therefore , even if they could know God’s foreknowledge, they would never do the opposite.Mmarco:
People who go to Heaven can know if they just ask it.You cannot know God’s foreknowledge, therefore your argument is clearly wrong.
God has always known everything eternally.
See above, the wicked serve that plan.will directly contradict your end goal
The only thing beyond my understanding is how you aren’t seeing the very basic premise behind my argument.questioning that which is beyond our understanding.
I do. I simply dont give it as much weight as you do, for I find it flawed.The only thing beyond my understanding is how you aren’t seeing the very basic premise behind my argument.