Why is predestination wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter zhangxupage
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
"PEPCIS:
I like the way that John Gerstner puts it, when he says:
"“Repent or Perish” forces people to ponder seriously the popular slogan, “God hates the sin and loves the sinner.” Is a necessary repentance consistent with “God loves the sinner?” If God loves the sinner while he is alive, it is strange that God sends him to hell as soon as he dies. God loves the sinner to death? Loves him to everlasting torment?
"
Yes, it is strange if
God did send the sinner to hell. But as I have said time and again, God does not send us to hell. Please get that right. God does not send us to hell. We send ourselves to hell.
Two things:

  1. *]You’re obfuscating once more by being contentious over a point that is not being argued. We were debating the proposition that God only loves UNTIL the sinner is banned to heaven - regardless of whether that banning occurs as the result of man’s sending himself to hell, or God doing the sending.
    *]Answer the question: Does God STOP loving the sinner the moment he goes to hell? If so, why does God stop loving the sinner???
    40.png
    benedictus:
    You keep evading the importance of free-will in any understanding of predestination.
    That’s because there is no such thing as “free will.”
    40.png
    benedictus:
    God loves the sinner while he is alive so that He will change. Until the very last moment, God calls the sinner to repentance. That is why it is very important that we realize that, that God is calling us to repentance.
    Why does He stop loving???
    40.png
    benedictus:
    God loves Him even then but He cannot override our free will.
    LOL God loves us to death!!! I love it! We have so much free will, that the majority of earth’s citizens will “freely” choose to go to hell!
    PEPCIS said:
    Why should it be that God cannot love with an everlasting love?
    40.png
    benedictus:
    Wrong question. God loves with an everlasting love.

    You’re contradicting yourself. You claim that God loves us with an everlasting love, but that He refuses to intercede on the behalf of His creation? You gotta do better than that.
    benedictus said:
    Why and how does He shut his love off for those who have died without repenting?
    40.png
    benedictus:
    Wrong question again.

    HOW IS THAT THE WRONG QUESTION?? Just because you say it is?? You MUST do something better than say that He keeps on loving us while we are in Hell for eternity!!
 
“Us.” Not “everyone.” Christ died for those sinners who were predestined to live in Him.
How do we even know we belong to the “US’ since we are all sinners.
Also, what criteria does God use to determine which sinner is to be saved and which sinner will not be saved.
He didn’t need to say that, because the language he used precluded the possibility of including only or all “the liars and the one who sows discord among brethren.”
So therefore idolatry (which is a sin against the first commandment), adultery, murder are all forgivable but not “lying” and ‘sowing discord”.
So YOU say. The Bible does not say that. You have to force it to say that.
Nope. Here is the Bible for you: God so loved the world that He gave His only Son. It did not say God loved some of the world.
True. But he did NOT die for the entire human race.
Yes, He died for the entire Human race.** But not the entire Human race will accept Him. This is where your problem is. You keep evading free will.** For goodness sake, I have said time and again we are not robots. Our damnation will be our fault. God gives the grace of salvation to all men but we have to say Yes to Him.
Let’s settle this by asking a simple question: "If ALL the sins of ALL men were laid upon Christ, how could He possibly say to certain men, “Ye shall seek Me, and shall die in your sins.” (John 8:21) ?
And if you will get rid of that nasty habit of chopping up the Bible you will realize that He was addressing the Jews who did not believe in Him and who were plotting his death. They will die in their sin because THEY CHOSE to deny Him.
Yep. But not everyone.
Yes it is offered to everyone but not everyone of THEIR OWN FREE WILL will accept it.
I think you do not want to bring free will into the equation because it puts the onus of sin on you. You will then have to accept the fact the of your OWN FREE WILL you chose to sin.
The New Testament DOES NOT say otherwise.
The New Testament says that Christ died for us while we were still sinners. So tell me, if God hated sinners would He have died for us?
The New Testament says that God so loved the world that He gave us His Only Son. Now the world is us and we are sinners.
As I have said before, If God hates sinners then GOD HATES YOU BECAUSE ARE A SINNER.

Your statement of “God hates sinners” does not allow for any ifs or buts. It is a very universal statement that excludes NO ONE.
Well, that’s a real nice bit of human logic,
Which GOD GAVE US to USE for His glory.
 
but does nothing to explain what the Bible teaches. The Bible teaches that “The Lord hath laid on Him the iniquity of us all” (Isa 53:6). And we know that the “all” refers to “us”, because we are told the “us” in verse 8 of the same chapter –
But who is the US?
“For the transgression of My people was He stricken.” Again in verse 12: “And He bare the sin of MANY”, not ALL.
Only because not everyone will follow His will. Those who follow His will, will be part the Many. Again, free will.
EXACTLY. So please follow this:
Since you agree with me that we have all lied.
And since according to you God hates liars.
Therefore God hates all of us.

Since according to you those whom God hates God damns.
Therefore we are all damned. Not a single one will be saved.

Think about that. Carefully.
EVERYONE stands condemned. “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.” (Romans 3:23) And, “…for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin; As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.” (Romans 3:9-11)
Yes, so follow that line of thinking and the only conclusion is: WE ARE ALL GOING TO HELL. SO WHAT DID CHRIST HAVE TO DIE FOR.

Please think logically. God gave you that gift called reason.
No, because I can stand before God righteous for what Christ has accomplished for me.
But you say God hates sinners. Either God hates sinners or He does not. The very fact that you say that Christ has redeemed you means that God does not hate sinners or else He would not have redeemed you, a sinner through and through.

Again. Logic please.
But God cannot see my sins, because they have been wiped away by the blood of Christ.
Exactly. He wiped your sins away.

So slowly again.
  • God hates sinners. Which means ALL sinners no exception.
  • You are a sinner.
  • Christ (who is God) wiped your sins away.
  • Question: Why did Christ (who is God) die to wipe your sins away?
  • If the answer is because He loves you, then the fist statement “God Hates Sinners” is already false.
  • The only time it will be true is if that statement read: God hates SOME SINNERS becuase then just maybe you belong to the other bunch of sinners whom He does not hate.
    Think about that. Slowly.
    I am finding it frustrating because it seems that simple reasoning evades you completely. You keep posting arguments that support my point and you do not even see it.
Very true. Our plight is definitely hopeless if not for the blood of Christ.

Maaan. PRECISELY AGAIN. THE FACT THAT HE SENT US HIS SON MEANS THAT HE DOES NOT HATE SINNERS, BECAUSE WE WERE AND ARE SINNERS AND YET HE DIED FOR US.

Are you so thick that you cannot get that? My 16 year old niece gets it and I am sure if she was only 9 she would still get it because it is very simple reasoning.

I AM SO SORRY TO SAY THIS BUT YOU ARE SO FRUSTRATINGLY ILLOGICAL, I refuse to continue with this any further.
 
Actually SHW had it correct but not quite in the way your phrased it. The grace of reconciliation was poured out on us because of Christ’s death on the cross. Because of this grace, we are able to work out our salvation.

If we go with your wording that “working out our salvation is a cause of of reconciliation” you then have a doctrine of reconciiation that rests solely on man’s effort ie. we are reconciled because of our own working.

But that is not the case. God died for us first to open the floodgates of reconciliation. And from this overflowing grace, we are able to work out our salvation.
Amen! First Jesus reconciles us to God. He had mercy on us and sent His Son to justify us. There was nothing that we could possibly do that could atone for Adam’s sin. Only Jesus could atone by His perfect Sacrifice. This is to what Ephesians 2:8 is referring.

But, once He reconciles us, we then must cooperate with the graces given us in order to remain in this reconciliation with God. Of course, if we die immediately after our Baptisms, which is the method that Jesus chose to apply the merits of His Sacrifice to our souls, we go straight to heaven. (Ephesians 5:25-27, Matthew 28:18-20, 1 Corinthians 6:11)

If we do not die immediately, then we must be diligent to remain in sanctifying grace if we wish to enter eternal life. If we have venial sins on our souls when we die, we must be purified because nothing impure can enter heaven. (1 Corinthians 3:14)

This is why the Apostles kept exhorting the believers to remain “in Christ.” If you sin grievous sins, you are no longer “in Christ” because the Holy Spirit has left your temple/soul and you are condemned to hell by your sin(s) unless you repent again. (Hebrews 10:26-30, 1 Corinthians 3:16-18))

SHW
 
Reconciliation is SOLELY the sacrificial work of Christ on the Cross. Man could never in a million years do ANYTHING that would result in his reconciliation to the Father. It required the work of Christ on the Cross.
I agree with this statement. However, we must have faith (believe) and be baptized in order to receive this reconciliation. (Mark 16:16)
It was by the shedding of Christ’s precious blood on the Cross that God’s wrath was averted. (Col. 1:20) By your introducing this notion that man must work to maintain his salvation, you have caused man’s work to be added to the work of Christ on the cross, and have caused his work to be insufficient to bring about your salvation.
Scripture states that “Love covers a multitude of sins.” If Jesus’ sacrifice is all that is necessary, then there is absolutely no need for “love to cover/atone for a multitude of sins.” (1 Peter 4:8)

There would be no need to pull people from the fire. (Jude 1:20-24) Jude states that we must keep ourselves in the love of God. (John 15:6, John 14:23)

James 5:19-20 “Brethren, if anyone among you wanders from the truth, and someone turns him back, 20 let him know that he who turns a sinner from the error of his way will save a soul from death and cover a multitude of sins.

1 Timothy 4:16 “Take heed to yourself and to the doctrine. Continue in them, for in doing this you will save both yourself and those who hear you.”

You picked one or two verses out of the Bible and without understanding how they fit in with the whole process of Salvation, you declared all other Scripture verses pertaining to Salvation as null and void because they don’t fit your interpretation.

Peter warned against this. You are one of the “untaught.”

2 Peter 3:14-17 "Therefore, beloved, looking forward to these things, be diligent to be found by Him in peace, without spot and blameless; 15 and consider that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation—as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, 16 as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.
17 You therefore, beloved, since you know this beforehand, beware lest you also fall from your own steadfastness, being led away with the error of the wicked; 18 but grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

Paul states that we are to be taught by the Church leaders. (2 Timothy 2:2)

SHW
 
One interesting thing that I must note is that you proceed from God foreseeing our actions, and then predestinating us according to those actions. If we do not perform what is necessary for salvation, then God will not predestinate.

Once again, you assign the work of God to man. Predestination is the work of God, but in your convoluted doctrine, you have made it the work of man which God foresees. What need is there for God to predestine anyone who already has - by his own actions - secured himself a place in the heavenlies???

So, it is clear, by your interpretation, that man performs the work that becomes his own predestination Congratulations!! You have just succeeded in eliminating the need for Jesus!
We are judged by our works (1 Peter 1:16-17) but no one could get into heaven until Jesus reconciled us to God FIRST. Adam’s sin alienated all mankind from God and only Jesus could reconcile us to God by being the Perfect Paschal Sacrifice.

This is why all the dead people who died before Jesus’ Sacrifice were either in prison (purgatory), or else the bosom of Abraham (limbo) awaiting Jesus’ resurrection and ascension into heaven so that Jesus could unlock the gates of heaven in order for us to enter. (1 Peter 3:18-20, Luke 16:22-23)

The souls of those who were not saved are already in hell with the fallen angels (except for those who are allowed to tempt man on earth…1 Peter 5:8) and are awaiting Final Judgment on the Day of the Lord when He separates the sheep from the goats.
2 Peter 2:1-2 “But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord who bought them, and bring on themselves swift destruction. 2 And many will follow their destructive ways, because of whom the way of truth will be blasphemed…4 For if God did not spare the angels who sinned, but cast them down to hell and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved for judgment…9 then the Lord knows how to deliver the godly out of temptations and to reserve the unjust under punishment for the day of judgment, 10 and especially those who walk according to the flesh in the lust of uncleanness and despise authority.”

So, yes, God predestined us according to the works we did which He saw with His foreknowledge before He created the world. He predestined those whom He foreknew (Romans 8:29, Romans 11:2). God only “knows” those who are saved when they die. He does not know those who are condemned to hell. (Matthew 7:20-23)

God only uses “predestine” and “knows” and “foreknew” in a positive manner in Scripture. We are condemned to hell; never predestined to hell. If He does not “know” us or never “foreknew” us, then we are not predestined and we are not the elect and we are not saved. (Romans 8:29, Romans 11:2)

SHW
 
It’s extremely important to keep in mind that the Bible teaches only FAITH as the means of salvation. What I have repeatedly heard from you is that man must WORK to obtain his final salvation.
James 2:24 “You see then that a man is justified by works, and not by faith only.”

SHW
 
"PEPCIS:
The fact is, change and exchange are often “exchanged” for one another. For example, we might say: “He got change for a twenty and used it to pay the taxi driver.” He EXCHANGED money for a ride. An EXCHANGE took place whereby the rider changed his money into a ride.
True the driver exchange the money for a ride, but the driver did not change the money into a ride. The money did not become a ride, It is still money. But he swapped his money for a ride.
Here’s the thing: there are differences in the two words, but I do not believe that the interpreters meant to intimate anything different had taken place.

You keep on insisting on the use of exchange. I reject it. Why? Because it has a subtle error. What is that subtle error? It is found in the definition.

In defining exchange, you state that “The money did not become a ride, It is still money. But he swapped his money for a ride.”

Very good. So, if I adopt your definition, which I do, then I MUST reject “exchange” as a viable alternative to “change.” Why? Because God does not exchange anything. The word exchange carries with it the understanding that two parties are exchanging something.

As in the story of the taxi driver and the rider, an exchange took place. The taxi driver took money, in exchange for the rider to receive a ride. They each received something in return for what they offered.

In speaking of Romans 1:25, we see that “change” is the appropriate term to use, because what does God receive in place of a sinner’s acceptance of His Truth? “They exchanged the truth about God for a lie…” So, the sinner gives God a lie, and God gives the sinner His Truth?

You see how very little sense this makes?

Instead, what we have is like me taking the Book of Mormon off of my shelf (which I keep there for reference), and cutting it up into little pieces of confetti so that I can use it at a wedding party.

Are the little pieces of confetti still the Book of Mormon? Yes, of course they are. But they become of little use to anyone because it has been fundamentally altered. It was not exchanged. It was CHANGED.

For the same token, wicked men take God’s truth, and they chop it up into little pieces of confetti, to suit their own purposes. They fundamentally alter it, changing it into something that suits their own senses, and does not offend their notions of who God should be. These kind of men do not like the God of the Bible, so they alter God’s Truth about who He is to manufacture a God of their own liking.
 
The way that you stated this is a great illustration of the difference between you and I. I accept the Biblical understanding
Here is an error in logic. There is no such thing as a “biblical understanding.” The bible is a collection of books, and written works, Holy though they may be, do not have the capacity of “understanding” which require intellect and discernment. This is an examply of anthropomorphism, projecting qualities of humans onto inanimate objects.

In truth, it is your own understanding, what you have interpreted the bible to mean, that you have espoused.
Code:
whereas you create your own understanding of God's foreknowledge driving predestination.  The Bible is crystal clear regarding the *ordo salutis*
.

This is actually what you have done. In departing from the Apostolic faith given to the Church, you have created your own rendition. I do believe, however, that the understanding you have is quite clear in your mind. It constitutes “a different gospel”, having emerged from the minds of Reformers 1500 years after the fact.
The question (may I remind you?) which Paul said, not me, is a RHETORICAL question. We KNOW that God is for us, therefore, if God is for us, then who, or what, could possibly be against us?
It is interesting to read this. I agree, it is rhetorical. However, when Jesus says “the one who perseveres to the end I will not blot his name out of the book of life”, one may not infer that it is possible to be blotted?

When the Apostle says “against us”, he is speaking of those in union with Christ and the Church. Once a person forsakes Christ through disobedience, and separates himself from the Church, there is no longer an “us”. This is what Paul was referencing when he spoke of handing people over to the devil, so they may learn not to blaspheme.
Who could have the power to stop the work which God has begun?? Answer: NOBODY!
God allows us to choose Him. If we deny Him, He will also deny us.
You’re defining this passage way too general for what it was speaking of. SPECIFICALLY, this passage was dealing with the progression of salvation of God’s elect.
Yes, and it describes them in the past tense, because it describes only those who have already been glorified. 😃
Notice how Paul states in Romans 8:28: “And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to those who are the called according to his purpose.”

First, you must recognize that Paul is NOT talking of ALL THE WORLD. He is addressing born-again believers in Christ. The question is to them. The question is to “those who are the called according to His purpose.
Not just the called, but the ones who love God. Loving God means being obedient to God. When one’s love grows cold, He will spit them out.
Secondly, the obvious question that flows from this is, “How is it that we know that all things work together for the good of God’s elect?”

Paul follows that with the answer to our question (vss. 29&30):
[SIGN]“For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.”[/SIGN]

Yes. past tense. These are those who persevered to the end. We may be among them if we continue in the faith.
Two things:


  1. *]These things which Paul makes mention of (“foreknowledge, predestination, calling, justification, glorification”) are the continuing and unfolding process of salvation.

  1. This is what the Catholic Church beleives and teaches.
    It is TOTALLY a work of God. We can’t “foreknow”, and we can’t “predestinate”, and we can’t “call” and we can’t "justify, and we can’t “glorify”. Everyone of those works is a function of God.
    These parts are His. It is incumbent upon us to respond to his call. To repent, believe, be baptized, follow His commandments, work out our salvation. None of these activities, human in origin, are done apart from His grace, either.
    That is why Paul could say, [SIGN]“For by grace are you saved through faith, and that not of yourselves, it is a gift of God, not of works, lest any man should boast.”[/SIGN]
    And why he could also say “not that I have already attained…”
 
Perhaps you might agree that I have become mistaken because of what I am told by Catholics?
Absolutely! After reading this thread, I have no doubt. 😉
If that were the case, then I would not be repeatedly told that we must work our way to get to heaven. Why do you suppose that is?
I think there are two reasons. Many Catholics are poorly catechized, and do not understand the Church’s teaching on grace and justification. Another is that we are using similar terms differently. Evangelicals often use the word “salvation” to refer to what Catholics call “initial justification”. For Catholics, salvation is justification, sanctification, and glorification. We do not separate them from one another as the children of the Reformers were taught to do. It is not Apostolic.

I will also add that there is a great misundersting about the role of “work” in salvation. I think evangelicals agree with Catholics that we are to “work out our salvation with fear and trembling”, but some Evangelicals mistake Catholics “working” as not based on grace, and some Catholics misunderstand the effort as “working on” instead of “working out”. Does that make sense?
I SHOWED you his statements. It’s not a matter of my perceptions, but what he has said. Apparently, your perceptions are muddled.
It is true that we perceive things differently. I cannot say that I agree with the way benedictus2 explains everything, either.
If you need to MAINTAIN your salvation, it is no different than bringing yourself salvation, since salvation is NEVER complete (according to your own testimony) UNTIL YOU ARE DEAD, and your works have been balanced out to see if you did enough good to make it into heaven.
I am sorry, but it is different. If my father buys me a new car because there is no way I can afford it, but tells me I must maintain it and insure it, how does that then enable me to obtain the car? My credit is shot, and it is impossible. It was gifted to me. Now I must preserve, hold fast, and cling to what was deposited to me. I must treat it with the very great value that it has, so that I maintain it. When it comes to eternal life, we cannot do this apart from God’s grace. Come to think of it, I can 't pay the car insurance without His grace either. 😉

The grace to maintain is from God. It is He who upholds us, and is able to complete that which He has begun in us. We must cooperate, though, do our part.

It is not a balance sheet of good works. What matters is faith. Is a person in a state of grace, through faith. Only belieiving on the One can save us. Faith is something that belongs to people. It is we who must place our faith in him, it is we who must exercise and build up our faith. We do this by his grace, but it does not happen passivly. We must make every effort, as the Apostle teaches.

If you need to MAINTAIN your salvation, it is no different than bringing yourself salvation, since salvation is NEVER complete (according to your own testimony) UNTIL YOU ARE DEAD, and your works have been balanced out to see if you did enough good to make it into heaven.
I sure as heck did not fall off the turnip truck, and I can assure you that I know what words mean. Catholics on this forum have repeatedly assured me that if you don’t presevere until the end, then you aren’t saved. That is a works-righteousness doctrine.
No, if we do not persevere to the end, we WILL not be saved. This is what I was talking about the use of the word “salvation” meaning different things. The Apostles taught that salvation was something past, present, and future. Some parts of it are completed, some are in process, some are yet to come. We do not consider that we have attained, but we hold fast to that which has taken hold of us.

There is no such thing as “works-righteousness”. That would be a strawman. One cannot be righteous before God by works - only by grace, through faith.
Code:
That, coupled with the fact that you can lose your salvation, is an egregious error.
I agree that it is a poor formulation. I much prefer to say it has not yet been attained, as this is the Apostolic rendering of our condition in this life. We are running the race.
Code:
 If you can lose it, that means you never had it.
I disagree. The Apostolic teaching is clear in several places that it was had, then lost.

Jesus makes this clear in the parable of the soils. 75% of the seeds sprout, then 2/3 of those do not bear fruit.
You could never have had it, because you don’t maintain your good works. It’s as simple as that.
Well, I think this is a wrong conclusion, based on a wrong premise. Saving grace produces good fruit. I think we would agree on that point. Secondly, we don’t maintain good works through the flesh, but only by the Spirit. For this reason, it is dependent upon the One who is able to keep us from stumbling, and to present us as pure. It is faith, working through love. Love is not separated from the grace that saves us.
I believe that those who have worked to receive the promise will lose it.
I believe that those who work to receive the promise will never gain it. It can only be gained by grace, through faith.
Code:
We don't work to earn our salvation.  We work because we love Him.  There is a difference.  Good works are a result of God working in us, not us working in God.
I am glad that we can agree on this point. I am baffled why you don’t seem to understand that this is what we are talking about when we say that
 
"PEPCIS:
What I do know is that not everyone will make it to heaven. That tells me that there will surely be many who will die before they repent.
Theoretically I agree with you. But I cannot be sure about that as I am still this side eternity.
You have MORE than theory. We have the Bible to instruct us. And the Bible clearly states that we MUST,

[SIGN]“Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate [entrance to hell] is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate [entrance to heaven] is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few.”[/SIGN]
benedictus said:
I am the other way around. I used to think like that. But as I grew older, I came to realize that God is more merciful and more loving than I believed Him to be.
40.png
PEPCIS:
Well, that doesn’t make any sense to me. How can God be any more merciful than He is? God’s mercy is perfect mercy. But that mercy is mitigated by His Justice and His retribution.
40.png
benedictus:
Actually I think it is the other way around. God’s justice is mitigated by His mercy. If this were not so, He would not have sent His Only Son to save us.

Both are true. God’s mercy is mitigated by His justice, and His Justice is mitigated by His mercy. But you emphasize His mercy, and speak NOTHING of His justice. A complete and unbiblical balance.
40.png
benedictus:
If we only went by God’s Justice, we are all destined for hell without any hope of salvation.
This is “true,” but it is dead wrong. It is “true” that IF WE ONLY WENT BY GOD’S JUSTICE, WE ARE ALL DESTINED FOR HELL WITHOUT ANY HOPE OF SALVATION.
PEPCIS said:
Not only that, but it fails to agree with what you have previously stated. Previously, you have stated that you believe that the power to choose salvation is ultimately in man’s hand. God proffers it, but man must exercise it. This may be true, but it means that there will be many men who will fail to exercise their choice for God. That will negate the mercy of God, because God’s mercy will make no matter if man does not avail himself of it.
40.png
benedictus:
No, it will not negate the mercy of God. The mercy is still there being offered. Man will refuse that mercy. So God’s justice has to be enforced.

It WILL negate the mercy [the very GRACE] of God, because if man is the sole instrument of salvation by proxy, then that removes the necessity of God’s mercy. It is no longer God’s mercy/grace, if we do ANYTHING along the way to earn it.

Here, read what God says about that notion:

[SIGN]“Even so then at this present time also there is a remnant according to the election of grace. And if election comes by grace, then it cannot come by works: otherwise grace would no longer be grace” (Romans 11:5-6)[/SIGN]

God began the work of salvation, and Christ will finish it - not man:

[SIGN]“Let us fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and FINISHER of our faith…”[/SIGN]

What you and SHW continue to deny is that Christ,

[SIGN]“saved us, not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit…” (Titus 3:5)[/SIGN]

Some people asked Jesus, “What shall we do, that we might work the works of God?” Jesus immediately pointed them to faith: “This is the work of God, that ye believe on Him whom He hath sent” (John 6:28-29). So, the question is about what can man do to become saved and evidence that in their lives, and Jesus’ answer is, “God’s requirement is that you BELIEVE in Me.”

[SIGN]“Apart from me you can do NOTHING.” (John 15:5)[/SIGN]
 
Code:
We are forced to eat what God has designed to sustain us.
This is false. God has given us a choice. We can choose the evil.
For the same token, a saved man cannot help but produce good fruit. He is designed for no other thing. He may stumble from time to time, but is never sent out from the Father’s hand once in it.
What do you make of the 50% of the seeds that sprouted, yet did not bear fruit? You can’t say they never sprouted…

I agree that one is not “sent” from the Father’s hand. He must willfully bite the hand that feeds Him and turn away - flee. This is the only way to spurn the Son of God afresh.
Code:
 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.  Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them." (Matthew 7:16-20)[/SIGN]
But you see, it is a fruit bearing tree, just as what the fig tree that He cursed.

By not bearing fruit, it fell short of His intention for it. It was created for fruit, but did not produce. IT is cut down, and thrown into the fire.
PEPCIS;4813551:
Code:
It doesn't really matter if you believe in it or not.  The question is, "Does the Bible teach it?"  The answer is clearly, "Yes!"
No, the truth is that the bible does not “teach”. People teach. You have been taught this. Catholics have been taught differently because our faith has been handed down to us from the Apostles.
Code:
As I pointed out in my last post, you are assigning the work of God to man.
No. God’s permitting people to choose is within His sovereignty.
And surely it is. But the surety of salvation is what is in question. The Bible teaches it as a process: “work out your salvation with fear and trembling”. But it is also a finished work, completed on the cross, and propitiated to our wretched souls who believe on His name.
Salvation is a process, but the Bible does not “teach”. This is apostolic teaching. IT appears in the Bible because the Church teaches it. Only persons can “teach”. It is a gift of God to the Church.
It’s extremely important to keep in mind that the Bible teaches only FAITH as the means of salvation.
Not only does the bible not teach, but faith is not what saves us. We are saved by grace.

That grace manifests itself in our lives through faith working in love. Obedient faith that follows the commandments. Saving faith is an active faith.
What I have repeatedly heard from you is that man must WORK to obtain his final salvation.
We must work to hold fast to what we have attained, and we must make every effort to add to what has been given us. To the one that has, more will be given.
“And if salvation is by grace, then it is not by works: otherwise grace would not be grace. But if salvation is by works, then it is not by grace: otherwise work is no more work.” (Rom. 11:6)
[/SIGN]

I think that some people do not understand the right relationship of “work” in salvation.
 
"PEPCIS:
Yes, He loves all His people. And that is Biblical language which does not include the whole world.
How can the whole world not be His people when He created each and everyone of us?
He created the Human Race. You can only say that He created “us” if you are elected from before the foundation of the world. Otherwise, you are one of the many on the wide road to destruction.
PEPCIS said:
Not to mention, What kind of a loving God would He be if the wicked were never punished, and were allowed to continue to persecute and prey upon the people?
40.png
benedictus:
Oh, but they are punished. Just not damned. That is of course, provided they repent before death.

Well, that is only true if I believe the gospel according to benedictus. :confused: The Bible has a different account which says that all liars will have their place in the lake of fire. Sure sounds like God is punishing.
40.png
benedictus:
As you said it is Bbilical language. Torment there will be. But the flames or fire may not be the kind of fire we know of. We have to remember than when we get to eternity, it will not be like kind of physical world we know now.
Once again, we return to the gospel according to benedictus. And once again, we find that the Bible speaks differently. Who am I to believe. Gee, I’ll stick with God. :rolleyes:
 
Code:
 Christ's death on the cross was what we call "efficacious."  That means that His death was fully capable of saving every last soul on Earth, and even those before His day, and those who would be born till the end of time.
The only difference is that not all will be saved. But out of all the elect, there will be free and slave, rich and poor, bad and badder. (Good people don’t need salvation.)
True, but once they are saved, if they continue in sin, the will not persevere to the end.
 
"PEPCIS:
He will not hold him guiltless that taketh His name in vain. All liars will have their place in the lake of fire. NO adulterer, or fornicator shall inherit the kingdom of Heaven.
40.png
benedictus:
Only because the adulterer and fornicator chose to disobey God.
40.png
PEPCIS:
Except for this little thing called “predestination.” Apparently, it’s ok if God looks down the corriders of time, and sees that someone chooses Him, and so He predestinates that person to enter the kingdom of Heaven, as long as you don’t have to say that He looks down the corriders of time, and sees that someone rejects Him, and so He predestinates that person to enter Hell.

You can’t have it both ways.
Both cases do not go under the label of predestination as Calvin or the Catholic Church understands predestination.
I’m not considering what Calvin or the Catholic Church taught, but only what the Bible teaches. If you claim that God predestinates according to the choices that He sees you make from before the foundation of the earth, then He obviously predestinates BOTH CHOICES, not just the “right” choice.

And actually, others have claimed that “double predestination” is wrong, but that is EXACTLY what you teach when you claim that God looks into the future and predestinates according to what man does. You make man the one that predestinates himself to hell or heaven.
PEPCIS said:
Don’t get ahead of yourself! I was just “agreeing” to point out that those who refuse God’s salvation end up in Hell.
40.png
benedictus:
Yes! But it does not mean that God did not offer salvation to them. They refused.

No one said that God does not offer the gift of salvation to everyone, nor that they refuse.
40.png
benedictus:
The whole point of predestination from Calvinistic viewpoint is that some were not offered salvation at all.
No, the whole point of predestination is that even when some are offered, they will reject because God has NOT ELECTED THEM TO SALVATION.
PEPCIS said:
Pope John Paul II made a huge mistake when he stated that hell was “not a punishment imposed externally by God.” The pontiff declared that the Bible “uses a symbolical language” to speak of Hell. But as I have pointed out here, and elsewhere, that is stretching the limits of credible Bible exegesis.
40.png
benedictus:
Actually not. JPII is correct. Hell is not imposed externally by God because it is our choices that send us there.

That’s a different gospel than what the Bible preaches about. This appears to be the gospel according to benedictus.
40.png
benedictus:
God does not push you into the ravine. Rather in running away from God you fall into the ravine.
I agree.
PEPCIS said:
So yes, a perfect MERCIFUL, LOVING, GOD WHO WILL “not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.” A MERCIFUL, LOVING, GOD WHO DECLARES that “all liars shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.”
40.png
benedictus:
Only if they do not repent of their sins before death.

Wrong. Only if they don’t repent of their sins and trust in the FINISHED work that Christ completed that makes all other works unneccesary to work our way into heaven.
 
That’s a different gospel than what the Bible preaches about. This appears to be the gospel according to benedictus.
I just wanted to throw in also that the bible does not “preach” any more than it “teaches”. These are activities that require persons.
 
I will also add that there is a great misunderstanding about the role of “work” in salvation. I think evangelicals agree with Catholics that we are to “work out our salvation with fear and trembling”, but some Evangelicals mistake Catholics “working” as not based on grace, and some Catholics misunderstand the effort as “working on” instead of “working out”. Does that make sense?
“Faith working through love.” They are intertwined and cannot be separated if a person desires to be saved in the end (at his death).

Galatians 5:6 “For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but faith working through love.”
If my father buys me a new car because there is no way I can afford it, but tells me I must maintain it and insure it, how does that then enable me to obtain the car? My credit is shot, and it is impossible. It was gifted to me. Now I must preserve, hold fast, and cling to what was deposited to me. I must treat it with the very great value that it has, so that I maintain it. When it comes to eternal life, we cannot do this apart from God’s grace. Come to think of it, I can’t pay the car insurance without His grace either. 😉
I like that!
The grace to maintain is from God. It is He who upholds us, and is able to complete that which He has begun in us. We must cooperate, though, do our part.
It is not a balance sheet of good works. What matters is faith. Is a person in a state of grace, through faith? Only believing on the One can save us. Faith is something that belongs to people. It is we who must place our faith in him, it is we who must exercise and build up our faith. We do this by his grace, but it does not happen passively. We must make every effort, as the Apostle teaches.
It is definitely not a balance sheet. If you are in a state of mortal sin, your righteous deeds are remembered no more.

Ezekiel 18:23-29 “Do I have any pleasure at all that the wicked should die?” says the Lord GOD, “and not that he should turn from his ways and live?
24 “But when a righteous man turns away from his righteousness and commits iniquity, and does according to all the abominations that the wicked man does, shall he live (inherit eternal life)?** All the righteousness which he has done shall not be remembered; because of the unfaithfulness of which he is guilty and the sin which he has committed, because of them he shall die** (lose his salvation).
25 “Yet you say, ‘The way of the Lord is not fair.’ Hear now, O house of Israel, is it not My way which is fair, and your ways which are not fair? 26 When a righteous man turns away from his righteousness, commits iniquity, and dies in it, it is because of the iniquity which he has done that he dies. 27 Again, when a wicked man turns away from the wickedness which he committed, and does what is lawful and right, he preserves himself alive. 28 Because he considers and turns away from all the transgressions which he committed, he shall surely live; he shall not die. 29 Yet the house of Israel says, ‘The way of the Lord is not fair.’ O house of Israel, is it not My ways which are fair, and your ways which are not fair?”
No, if we do not persevere to the end, we WILL not be saved. This is what I was talking about the use of the word “salvation” meaning different things. The Apostles taught that salvation was something past, present, and future. Some parts of it are completed, some are in process, some are yet to come.
True.

2 Thessalonians 2:13-15 “But we are bound to give thanks to God always for you, brethren beloved by the Lord, because God from the beginning chose you for salvation through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth, 14 to which He called you by our gospel, for the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. 15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast and hold the traditions which you were taught, whether by word or our epistle.
There is no such thing as “works-righteousness”. That would be a strawman. One cannot be righteous before God by works - only by grace, through faith.
Actually, good works are necessary in order to be saved. But we can do nothing without Jesus’/Holy Spirit’s help. It is their graces which we cooperate with in order to maintain our salvation and perfect our faith because “faith without works is dead” and nothing dead can save us.

Acts 10:34-35 “Then Peter opened his mouth and said: “In truth I perceive that God shows no partiality. 35 But in every nation whoever fears Him and works righteousness is accepted by Him.”

James 2:26 “For as the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without works is dead also.”

1 Thessalonians 3:9-10 “For what thanks can we render to God for you, for all the joy with which we rejoice for your sake before our God, 10 night and day praying exceedingly that we may see your face and perfect what is lacking in your faith?”

James 2:22 “Do you see that faith was working together with his works, and by works faith was made perfect?”

to be continued…
 
Continued:
Saving grace produces good fruit. I think we would agree on that point. Secondly, we don’t maintain good works through the flesh, but only by the Spirit. For this reason, it is dependent upon the One who is able to keep us from stumbling, and to present us as pure. It is faith, working through love. Love is not separated from the grace that saves us.
Cooperating with sanctifying grace produces good fruit. We can do nothing good apart from God’s grace. Love (obeying God’s commandments and producing good fruits by helping our neighbor, etc.) perfects our faith. Good Works are proof of faith and that is why we are judged by our fruits/works on Judgment Day.

SHW
 
"PEPCIS:
Of course. God desires that all men would be saved, but He only wills for His elect to be saved.
Are you saying that God is acting contrary to His desire?
No. God is acting exactly according to His desires. It is a bit of a stretch to say that “God wants everybody to be saved” is the equivalent of “God will do everything He can to bring that about.”

If God wants EVERYONE to be saved, then they will be. Since we know that not everyone will be saved, then it is clear that this passage CANNOT MEAN that God wants everyone to be saved.

It’s not that hard to understand! 😦
PEPCIS said:
God also desires that ALL men would obey Him. Why do they not? Because, as you say, free will. I say it is due to His discretion.
40.png
benedictus:
So are you saying here that man disobeyed God because God willed that they would disobey Him
?

No, I am saying that man disobeys by his own will. But this is as God designed it. Why does a Tasmanian Devil eat lizards, frogs and insects? Because that’s how God designed him.
40.png
benedictus:
If He willed for man to disobey Him, and His Willing is effective then that makes Him an unjust God because he is punishing man for a sin man could not avoid committing because god has already willed that he should commit this sin.
God doesn’t cause men to sin. They sin of their own accord.
God, in His perfect will, has allowed some men to suffer the fate of their nature, which is to inherit eternal life in a lake of fire. He allows it. Just as you said, they CHOOSE this course. God does not make them choose it.

But, even so, the Bible answers your unjust criticism of God where you claim that such a scenario “makes Him an unjust God because he is punishing man for a sin man could not avoid committing…”
PEPCIS said:
It is in His plan. Who am I to know the mind of God? I can only tell you what He has revealed to us in His Word.
40.png
benedictus:
But where in His word did it say that He willed for some men to disobey him?

It doesn’t put it in those terms, but it’s found in Romans 9.
PEPCIS said:
I didn’t intend to say that God ever changed His design, and I think I have already cleared that up in our other discussion.
40.png
benedictus:
You may not have intended to say it but that is what you said. So now we are clear that He did not change his design.
40.png
PEPCIS:
Correct. Man changed God’s design.
40.png
benedictus:
But as you yourself said, His design continues. How can His design continue if man has already changed that design? Man cannot alter God’s design.

Think of God’s design like a Xerox copy. He keeps the original copy under lock and key, but He allows us access to the copy. The copy is AN EXACT DUPLICATE of His truth. Man takes it and changes it to suit his needs and preferences. Voila!! Man changes God’s truth into a lie.
40.png
benedictus:
I am beginning t think that we mean two different things here by God’s design.
No, we mean the same thing. You just are having trouble understanding that when man changes the truth of God into a lie, that he doesn’t change the copy and return it to God so that God can then pass on an adulterated copy to someone else. God’s truth CANNOT be changed. But man can change God’s truth into a lie. Both are true statements. The first means that God’s truth resides within Him, and the second means that He allows man access to a mimeographed copy.
 
"PEPCIS:

  1. *]God loves HIS people.
    *]God hates sinners.

  1. Take 2.

    If God loves HIS people but hates sinners, then that means that only those who are good, have never commited a sin, belong to the “His people” category.

  1. You’re getting closer all the time! That’s exactly what the Bible teaches!
    40.png
    benedictus:
    Since we are all sinners by vritue of orginal sin, then God hates us all.
    Sort of. But you have to put these two verses into context in order to appreciate what God is doing.

    [SIGN]“There is NONE good, no not one.” (Romans 3:10)[/SIGN]

    [SIGN]“As for you, regarding your own salvation - you USED TO BE dead in your trespasses and sins. Before you entered into the new life of Christ, you used to live like the devil, where you followed the ways of this world and did the bidding of the prince of the power of the air. This is the exact same spirit who is now at work in those who are not saved. All of us used to live among these disobedient people, gratifying the cravings of our sinful nature, and following the desires and thoughts of that nature within us. Just like the rest of the world, we were by nature objects of wrath.” (Ephesians 2:1-3)[/SIGN]
    40.png
    benedictus:
    Furthermore, can anyone say that they have not commited a single personal sin?
    No.
    PEPCIS said:
    God will one day judge the world, and send all those who have failed to accept His Son as Savior to hell.
    40.png
    benedictus:
    But we know that many have died and will die who do not even get an opportunity to accept or deny His Son as Savioiur? These people have not even been given the chance to accept or not to accept Jesus.

    This is a DIFFERENT subject altogether. But clearly, they are not of the elect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top