C
condan
Guest
That is not semantics. It is established scientific fact and part of the body of knowledge that deals with such types of attractions. The attraction to a child (pre-pubescent) is much different from the attraction to a youth. The desire for youth is very much a distinguishing characteristic of male homosexuality.I find the twisting and desperate use of semantics to call the molestation of a 12 or 13 or 14 year old boy “homosexual behavior” revolting. The boy is underage, it is morally pedophila. Heterosexual men who are attracted to and molesting/raping 12 and 13 and 14 year old girls don’t have their behavior described as “heterosexual”. It is perversion, and pedophila.
Unfortunately, this is not the case. Stats show that 75% of homosexuals have reported having contact with a minor.Homosexuals are attracted to adults of the same sex.
That is not the Church’s position. The Church is at risk for further grave scandal if men who are unable to abstain from same-sex activity are put into a position where they are frequently very lonely, where their peers are men, etc.I’ve heard that 80% of the cases of sex abuse in the Church occured between priests and boys just past puberty. Why is this a reason to bar all homosexuals from the priesthood? If you claim that homosexuals are inherently inferior to heterosexuals, that they are all automatically more prone to sin/going to sin no matter what…that seems to fly in the face of everything Catholicism has taught us.