G
guanophore
Guest
I am not sure what you mean by this, but the Catholic teaching is that they excommunicated themselves.Who would ban them from the church.
Heresy is an ex latae sententiae condition. the action in itself triggers the excommunication.What would the bannable offense be?
In what way do you think not?Presenting themselves as a couple isn’t against Church teaching.
No. Presenting themselves as a “couple” is sufficient. Coupling means they are not living together as siblings.One would have to have solid and direct knowledge of what they do behind closed doors to know if they were living sinfully, according the the Church.
I have known many priests who fail to address some egregious situations. It does not mean it is ok to commit the egregious acts. Pretending one accepts all that the Church believes and teaches when one does not is an egregious act.I don’t see the clergy at my local Catholic church telling a couple (like the one in my scenario) that they can’t attend as a couple and to knock off the hand–holding or else they aren’t welcome to attend.
This has already happened, and happens in parishes that are not orthodox in faith and practice.The point I was trying to make is that the day will come when gay couples will feel comfortable being active members in the Church, while not hiding the fact that they are gay or that they are a couple. I am talking about openly gay couples.
One parish in my archdiocese was closed by the Bishop and all the clergy reassigned for this, and other departures from the faith.
This is my greatest beef with all this bigotry and prejudice. There is not difference whether the sinner is homosexual, heterosexual, or asexual! A person who receives communion in a state of grave sin is a problem no matter what it is. This is what needs to be addressed.One would hope they choose not to receive communion, because they won’t be in full communion with the church unless they believe all of the Church’s teachings, of course. But that is no different than any other sinner who is in the same boat, just with different issues.
Apparently from @anon10271182 point of view. Jesus going after the lost sheep comes to mind. Why didn’t He just say "oh, well, that was a rebellious sheep anyway, a nuisance and might infect the flock by being wayward, just let it go off a cliff or get swept away in the river, that way the flock will be more “pure”.Losing members of the flock is “purification?”