Y
Your inability to answer a simple question ruins any point you may have.Your repeated question is irrelevant. Same sex “marriage” is a diabolical, grotesque parody of Holy Matrimony.
No. There isn’t. And it seems to answer the question, quite succinctly, posted by the OP. Very, very sad.Not a whole lot of love in this thread, sad to say.![]()
That revolution is giving people rights. I’m a teacher and this stuff is important.That may be your agenda and that’s what the powers-that- be want you to think. What harm is the little gay couple doing down the street? They are enjoying their life like the next couple.
Meanwhile a revolution is taking place.
I’ve lost no rights. I don’t recall the Bible weighing in on cakes or photos, was it near the part where Christ ate with tax collectors and prostitutes?Giving “rights” to one group and stealing rights from religious groups.
That’s one part of the agenda: to get rid of religious influence in all public spheres (even the word God in “O Canada”)
to take away our conscience rights (things like doctors being forced to refer for abortion against their conscience and making them complicit in sin)
to disallow religious people from following God’s word (things like forcing photographers to photograph the abomination of gay “marriage”, against their better judgement, desire, and religious beliefs.)
Sorry but the utopia you are envisioning will be hell for many people.
I am not mystified. I was just making an observation. It is not I who has placed all sins on a par, it is God (unless you do not accept the New Testament as the Word of God).You earlier pointed out that there seems to be significant bigotry and prejudice about this minority population. You wrote this as if it’s a bit of a mystery to you, as if to say people should place the sexual sins of a gay couple on par with the sexual sins of straights and then be patient. What the heck? We’re all sinners.
There is definitely an agenda, one you summarized well. No, anger itself is not a sin, but anger does not accomplish the righteousness of God, either.If that’s all it took, I’d agree with you. But as a group, the LGBT have an agenda that is well-thought out and executed with precision. That is the part that gets us rightfully angry. Anger in itself is not a sin.
That sounds a bit paranoid.Their agenda isn’t even known by all of them and certainly not by many Catholics. I wouldn’t be surprised if LGBT-supporting people are paid to hijack these threads on CAF.
You are welcome. Someone did it once for me, and I have found it helpful. I put it on the fridge to remind me.Thanks for personalizing Corinthians for me but it sounds better in the original. Love begins with truth. How can it “rejoice with the truth” if that truth is unknown to so many?