Why would God care who we have sex with?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phil8888
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Zatzat

*Funny, that the kids don’t really care who their parents are having sex with. *

Apparently you wouldn’t care. :confused:
 
Zatzat

I’m free to think.

Yes, you’re free to think you can defy common sense and get away with it. :rolleyes:
 
My own sense of morality, coupled with the danger that familial sexual relations has on the gene pool, along with the potential for abuse and mental instability…I agree. A perversion and a crime.
This is very similar to the Church’s teaching on homosexual sex in that ultimately, it’s bad for society.

Prohibition of incest, by the way is very biblical.

Which brings up another question: By your own standards, is homosexual incest perverted? After all, we don’t have those gene pool considerations to worry about.
 
By your own standards, is homosexual incest perverted? After all, we don’t have those gene pool considerations to worry about.
This is my original answer, which expands well beyond contaminating the gene pool;
My own sense of morality, coupled with the danger that familial sexual relations has on the gene pool, along with the potential for abuse and mental instability…I agree. A perversion and a crime.
 
Zatzat

*My reasoning is grounded in reality and not in the supernatural. *

Common sense is real. The parts don’t fit.

Since God made us in His image and likeness, our common sense is very much grounded in the supernatural.
 
and just about every other mainstream religion in existence. Do you really think that Christianity, through Jesus invented the golden rule? :rolleyes:
no it was well established before Jesus with the chosen people…Jewish. not every religion has this nor could they ever claim tribute to their (name removed by moderator)ut. Today is way different than yesterday as we have more in connection and therefore share more ideals as well… back then however, the road of communication was limited to speech and not much occurred. Majority of your main stream consists of the fore front. the main religions that developed the golden rule (i.i Christianity, Judaism)
 
Funny, that the kids don’t really care who their parents are having sex with. Just the religious strangers seem to care.
Actually it is a concern as infidelity and adultery cause domestic violence and other problems.
 
Grace & Peace!
Common sense is real. The parts don’t fit.
As an argument, this is incredibly reductionist and unconvincing. “Common sense” should have indicated to you that there is more than one way to share sexual pleasure than insert tab A in slot B.

Additionally, your language invokes a metaphor of machinery–the body as mere machine, reducing sex to the movement of pistons in their sockets. Is that your understanding of sex? Are you arguing that sex is merely the utilitarian act by which both the machine is replicated and the genetic code by which the machine functions is pushed through to another generation? This is a highly sterile view of sex and sexuality. I hope you do not, in fact, share it, and that in using your machine metaphor you were merely and unthinkingly giving credence to a silly trope/cliche.

But finally, the ease with which “common sense” arguments are expressed through cliche is irksome as cliche involves a movement from the particular to the general such that the actual nuances of meaning by which meaning is actually made or understood are largely lost in favor of the whitewash of generality. “Common sense” comes off as merely ignorant, shallow, or narrow in the process. Was this you intention–to show up common sense for a fraud?

Regarding common sense being grounded in the supernatural, it is, in fact, grounded in culture-- which is to say it expresses a series of cultural tropes, stereotypes, prejudices, and is representative of cultural conditioning, not supernatural origin.

Under the Mercy,
Mark

All is Grace and Mercy! Deo Gratias!
 
Deo Volente

Regarding common sense being grounded in the supernatural, it is, in fact, grounded in culture-- which is to say it expresses a series of cultural tropes, stereotypes, prejudices, and is representative of cultural conditioning, not supernatural origin.

Says you. :rolleyes: Are you a sociologist?
 
Common sense dictates that we not violate the more obvious rules of reality.

You do not try to fit a square peg into a round hole. That doesn’t stop some people from trying to do it.

You don’t try to fit a penis into an anus. That doesn’t stop some people from trying to do it.

But common sense should prevail. It comes from God, and was designed by God to be used for our own good.

To say that common sense is a cultural trope is to say that in some cultures it might be valid to fit a square peg into a round hole, or that in some cultures it is eminently reasonable to try to fit a penis into an anus.

I know of no such cultures, though doubtless there are people in some cultures who are glad to make *sses of themselves.
 
Common sense dictates that we not violate the more obvious rules of reality.

You do not try to fit a square peg into a round hole. That doesn’t stop some people from trying to do it.

You don’t try to fit a penis into an anus. That doesn’t stop some people from trying to do it.

But common sense should prevail. It comes from God, and was designed by God to be used for our own good.

To say that common sense is a cultural trope is to say that in some cultures it might be valid to fit a square peg into a round hole, or that in some cultures it is eminently reasonable to try to fit a penis into an anus.

I know of no such cultures, though doubtless there are people in some cultures who are glad to make *sses of themselves.
Square pegs can’t fit into round holes (unless it is a very big round hole). Penises can fit into anuses though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top