Will America become socialist now that Biden has basically won?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnz123
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Probably the type that watches Newsmax, Fox, believes QAnon, on Parler, etc.
 
Last edited:
48.png
Rasoleil:
Probably the type that watches Newsmax, Fox, believes QAnon, on Parler, etc.
You might learn something.
I learnt that they had no…what was the term…? Ah yes. Evidence. They had no evidence.

Be sure to let us know when you find somebody that has some.
 
And some more information on the ‘fraud’. The expert in the first video said that the fraud didn’t need to be nationwide - just in selected counties to swing that county’s state. He mentioned 5. He seem pretty convinced.

One of which was Atlanta in Georgia. Which has already been recounted by hand and which would show any discrepancy between any software glitches and the actual count. There was none. Which is enough to be able to completely reject his suggestion (I say suggestion as he had no evidence that this had happened).

Another was Milwaukee, which is in the process of being hand counted. Biden won that county by 317,000 to 134,000. Trump would need one massive swing to change that result and prove that the software was at best faulty. But that’s the one they chose to recount so they must be confident. We’ll know the result on Friday - they’ve done about 80% of the count so far.

And has there been a change in the numbers so far? Well, yes. It’s no good trying to deny it. Trump has lost 6 votes and Biden has gained 3.
 
Last edited:
SEC filings show that 75% of Dominion is currently owned by an investment company that is an arm of the CCP. 3 of 4 members of the board are registered CCP party members.

The supposed Russian interference in the 2016 election was based upon far less than that.

Let us put aside the accuracy of those claims of CCP ownership of Dominion and ask a purely hypothetical question…

If the CCP were determined to own 75% of Dominion, would that be sufficient to warrant a forensic investigation of the voting machines being used? Why or why not?

What do you say? No skirting or deflecting.
 
Last edited:
Community College of Philidelphia?
. . . .

You don’t want to answer the question, do you?

How about this one…

If election workers went out of their way to isolate, block, intimidate, shut out and bully monitors from actually monitoring what they were doing when the law requires bi-partisan observation and monitoring how is that not an indicator of being up to something fraudulent?

If the election workers were engaging in totally licit behaviour why the opposition to proper monitoring?
 
Last edited:
Actually I do. What is CCP?

And thank you for correcting my spelling. I was never very good at spelling. Sometimes it is hard to believe that English is my first language. Which would explain why I’m even worse at French.
 
Chinese Communist Party.

The allegations are…

Staple Street Capital filed paperwork on behalf of UBS Securities, a swiss investment bank that owns 24.99% of UBS Securities Co Ltd, a Chinese Investment Bank to purchase 50% of shares of Dominion for $400 million. The remaining 75% of UBS Securities is owned by the Chinese government (CCP).

Registered owners of UBS Securities Co LTD are:
– Beijing Guoxiang (33%)
– UBS (24.99%)
– Guangdong Comm. Group [zh] (14.01%)
– China Guodian (14%)
– COFCO Group (14%)
SEC documents: 12345

This follows a $200 million purchase of shares the year prior.

All of these are falsifiable claims, but if true should there be an investigation into foreign, i.e., CCP, influence in the election, given rhat the CCP effectively owns 75% of Dominion?
 
Last edited:
Which has already been recounted by hand and which would show any discrepancy between any software glitches and the actual count.
Actually, the recount was “by hand” in a very loose manner of speaking. Much of it was done by computer and did not include signature matching which is the crucial part of a hand canvas or hand audit which has not happened.

Otherwise why would Governor Kemp be calling for one?

 
Thats how it works in Canada I don’t know where your from had my knees replaced didn’t cost a dime and I made more money than if i was working with work insurance - thats all you need in Canada a insurance plan that will pay your wages when off for illness.
i heard someone from Alaska say that the taxes there are quite a bit lower than the taxes in Canada.
 
48.png
HarryStotle:
Otherwise why would Governor Kemp be calling for one?
Because he’s afraid of having Trump tweet negatively about him.
That’s a nightmare that is.

But your point misses the point that a legitimate hand count was not done in Georgia, proved by the fact that Kemp is again calling for one. Kemp’s reasons for calling for a complete signature matching audit (typically what a hand count is) are irrelevant to the point.
 
Last edited:
SEC filings show that 75% of Dominion is currently owned by an investment company that is an arm of the CCP. 3 of 4 members of the board are registered CCP party members.

The supposed Russian interference in the 2016 election was based upon far less than that.

Let us put aside the accuracy of those claims of CCP ownership of Dominion and ask a purely hypothetical question…

If the CCP were determined to own 75% of Dominion, would that be sufficient to warrant a forensic investigation of the voting machines being used? Why or why not?

What do you say? No skirting or deflecting.
I say it would be a good idea to check the totals that the machines come up with (effectively that’s all they do - count pieces of paper) with the actual paper votes themselves. The machines are there to save doing it manually. But if you did do it manually, then the two totals will match.

Guess what…

Edit: And this has already been explained to you. A hand count is just that. The paper votes are counted by hand. If there was a problem with the machines then a discrepancy in the totals would show it. If you feed 500 votes through the machine ten times then you get 5,000 votes. But there are still only 500 actual votes.

There. Is. No. Problem. With. The. Machines.

And all this time and you still have no evidence? Where is it? When’s it going to be presented and by whom? What form will it take? Enough with the smoke and mirrors already.
 
Last edited:
Where the leftist “progressivists” are heading…

https://andmagazine.com/talk/2020/1...ntroduces-bill-to-legalize-crimes-of-poverty/
If approved, the ordinance would excuse and dismiss, effectively legalizing, misdemeanor crimes committed by any offender who could show:
  • Symptoms of drug addiction. No medical diagnosis necessary.
  • Symptoms of a mental disorder.
  • Poverty and that the crime was committed to meet an “immediate and basic need.”
The undermining of the social order continues.
 
To be fair even St Thomas Aquinas excused certain ‘crimes’ if such was necessary to feed the hungry.
 
Poverty and that the crime was committed to meet an “immediate and basic need.”

That could be construed as such, Harry.

In addition, as far as the mentally ill go, I’m not sure why punishing them is in the interests of the right. Doesn’t that just involve housing them at state expense in jails and prisons?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top