Will not vote for Trump, but no pro-life Democrats?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RealisticCatholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The problem is the two party system and the brainwashed Americans that think their vote doesn’t count and that they MUST vote for one or the other.
This is my opinion, but I think a Christian has to be resigned to casting votes that the World will undoubtedly ignore. If the greatest voices in politics are given to the World, the Flesh, and the Devil–and the voice of wealth in politics is almost always the voice of worldliness, have no doubt about that–we ought to shout in thanksgiving every time we find a candidate we can vote for in good conscience.

No one is perfect, but there are limits.
 
Well no doubt lol just because someone talks nice doesn’t mean they assert Christian values or principles however.
 
Didn’t the original statement say Israeli Charitable Organizations? My bad if I edited that and did not include that originally but I do believe I included it, so your “lol” may be out of place.

Since “Israeli” was quoted, I assume I had the whole statement in there.

Tsunami in Japan, Israel goes, dam breaks in Brazil, Israel goes and helps. Those are fine things.
 
Last edited:
However, I have also learned that a vote for someone who has no chance of winning doesn’t help the person that is the lesser problem of the two that could win.
I’m not convinced the Dems running are a lesser problem. They are a different problem to be sure, but lesser problem? Questionable to say the least.
 
This kind of thinking is why 3rd party candidates don’t have a chance it really needs to change before America crumbles to the ground.
 
It’s self-indulgent and prideful when, as now, the third party candidate has no chance at all.
Where are we taught that being faithful to the Gospel means saying things the secular world will listen to?
I don’t think I’m morally-bound to vote for the lesser of two evils. I think I’m morally bound to withhold my vote from any candidate who is too morally problematic, even if it means I have no one to vote for who is likely to win.
 
Voting for the candidate that most lines up with your values is neither self indulgent nor prideful. Many people are sick of the choices we have had recently, and I don’t blame them at all for voting third party. If so many people weren’t locked into your line of thinking maybe we could get better candidates.
 
If we just opining, I’d say one does not have to do it but the Bible does tell us to honor our leaders and things like that.
 
Voting for the candidate that most lines up with your values is neither self indulgent nor prideful. Many people are sick of the choices we have had recently, and I don’t blame them at all for voting third party. If so many people weren’t locked into your line of thinking maybe we could get better candidates.
More to the point, how will these two parties ever be challenged if no one is willing to vote for any other party?
 
I don’t think I’m morally-bound to vote for the lesser of two evils
You are morally bound to oppose great evil when you can. One would fail that at the peril of his soul, and rightly.
 
This is not a man who is a “great and very brave soldier” in defense of the Christian attitude towards women and marriage.
He’s more brave than every man in DC put together. He has been attacked, his family has been demeaned, he has withstood 2+ years of fake investigations that resulted in nothing after 2+ years of fake news articles and constantly defends Christians like Catholics on abortion and Catholic Covington kids when everyone else jumped the gun. As far as women, let’s look at liberal icons are
(1) Bill Clinton, an alleged serial rapist, who lost license practice law and had to pay $850K settlement
(2) JFK a pervert who turned WH into a brothel every weekend (fact) while his wife fled the scene and (3) Ted Kennedy who killed a woman after which he was made “Lion of the Senate”,
 
In my opinion, they are a lesser problem.
Care to elaborate?

I’m just curious. I’m not going to shout you down like some of our more ideologically driven members who are turning this thread into a dumpster fire as we speak.
 
Voting for the candidate that most lines up with your values is neither self indulgent nor prideful
When it’s a thrown away vote, that’s exactly what it is. It’s like marrying someone because she looks like you. Self-love.
If so many people weren’t locked into your line of thinking maybe we could get better candidates.
If more people were clear-eyed about opposing murder, we would get better voters.
 
You are morally bound to oppose great evil when you can. One would fail that at the peril of his soul, and rightly.
What if you vote for a third party candidate that is pro-life? Or are we morally bound to vote Republican because they’re somewhat pro-life and have a better chance to win? At any rate I’m not convinced that more than a handful of Republicans are even interested in advancing the pro-life cause, they rather just have the issue as a cudgel to bash Democrats with.
 
The Democrats have pro choice as policy. Look at the horrific Cuomo bill. Hilary wanted to remove the fig leaf of the Hyde amendment and was widely lauded. Every candidate I can think of has moved to the left on abortion; even Joe Lieberman.
 
And now, unfortunately, you have people saying policies are veering towards infanticide.

I’d repeat that, “Infanticide”, nope, not voting for that.
 
What if you vote for a third party candidate that is pro-life? Or are we morally bound to vote Republican because they’re somewhat pro-life and have a better chance to win? At any rate I’m not convinced that more than a handful of Republicans are even interested in advancing the pro-life cause, they rather just have the issue as a cudgel to bash Democrats with.
The problem is 2 or 3 Republicans in the Senate hold up meaningful pro-life legislation such as Senators Collins and Murkowski preventing planned parenthood from being defunded.

The House defunded it, Trump said he’d sign it. The hold up was in the Senate and just a few Senators. 2 or 3.

On a state basis, the GOP has done even better.
 
Last edited:
He’s more brave than every man in DC put together. He has been attacked, his family has been demeaned, he has withstood 2+ years of fake investigations that resulted in nothing after 2+ years of fake news articles and constantly defends Christians like Catholics on abortion and Catholic Covington kids when everyone else jumped the gun. As far as women, let’s look at liberal icons are
(1) Bill Clinton, an alleged serial rapist, who lost license practice law and had to pay $850K settlement
(2) JFK a pervert who turned WH into a brothel every weekend (fact) while his wife fled the scene and (3) Ted Kennedy who killed a woman after which he was made “Lion of the Senate”,
Keep in mind that he did the same thing to the sitting President himself by implying he had investigators in Hawaii with evidence that Barack Obama was not born there when he had no such evidence at all. (You know the tweets are out there to prove it; this isn’t people saying things about him, but his own words.) He has the habit of spreading blatantly false rumors about others, even now. As for sexual offenses, again, it doesn’t take anyone else’s accusations to charge him. His own words say plenty to put him in a glass house.
His actions have lowered the standards of propriety and honesty in politics.
Live by the sword, die by the sword. I feel sorry for his three wives and for his children, but for him?
No, not so much.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top