T
tomarin
Guest
I have compassion for all victims of religious persecution, including Christians and Jews but not limited to them.What about the persecution of Christians and other minorities? They don’t count apparently
I have compassion for all victims of religious persecution, including Christians and Jews but not limited to them.What about the persecution of Christians and other minorities? They don’t count apparently
My feeling is that those penalties in Sharia which are clearly cruel and unusual punishment (chopping off hands, etc.) would not be allowed in the U.S. under current law. As you said, religious freedom is not an absolute right. Likewise you couldn’t get away with murdering someone because he apostasized on the grounds that it was part of your religion. Nor can a Muslim (or a Mormon) have more than one wife.Tomarin, why don’t you answer Pam’s question???
No, it’s not nonsense if sharia law were to become the law of the land and our Constitution were overthrown. You’re just being evasive like all apologists for Islam!My feeling is that those penalties in Sharia which are clearly cruel and unusual punishment (chopping off hands, etc.) would not be allowed in the U.S. under current law. As you said, religious freedom is not an absolute right. Likewise you couldn’t get away with murdering someone because he apostasized on the grounds that it was part of your religion. Nor can a Muslim (or a Mormon) have more than one wife.
Sharia Law only applies to Muslims so if the implication is that somehow Muslims will “take over” one way or another and impose it on us that’s just nonsense.
I’m not an “apologist” for anything. Sharia Law only applies to Muslims. The Jews and Christians living under Muslim rule always had their own laws drawn up by religious leaders from their own community. So your scenario is fatally flawed.No, it’s not nonsense if sharia law were to become the law of the land and our Constitution were overthrown. You’re just being evasive like all apologists for Islam!
Takkiya!I’m not an “apologist” for anything. Sharia Law only applies to Muslims. The Jews and Christians living under Muslim rule always had their own laws drawn up by religious leaders from their own community. So your scenario is fatally flawed.
You are correct - they would not be allowed under US current law.My feeling is that those penalties in Sharia which are clearly cruel and unusual punishment (chopping off hands, etc.) would not be allowed in the U.S. under current law. As you said, religious freedom is not an absolute right. Likewise you couldn’t get away with murdering someone because he apostasized on the grounds that it was part of your religion. Nor can a Muslim (or a Mormon) have more than one wife.
Sharia Law only applies to Muslims so if the implication is that somehow Muslims will “take over” one way or another and impose it on us that’s just nonsense.
Oh good, that makes me feel much better. Now I understand about the large number of synagogues and Christian churches in Saudi Arabia and the tremendous freedom those communities enjoy under Islamic rule . . . . .I’m not an “apologist” for anything. Sharia Law only applies to Muslims. The Jews and Christians living under Muslim rule always had their own laws drawn up by religious leaders from their own community. So your scenario is fatally flawed.
Sticks and stones, my dear, sticks and stones. You have no argument so you resort to name-calling.Takkiya!
Vickie
I live in Jersey City. Muslims haven’t “taken over” Jersey City. They are just one of many ethnic groups there. You really are intolerant.Muslims have taken over Jersey City, Union City, Weehawken, parts of North Bergen & Bayone.
And yes, I’ve seen what over cultures have done as well…
In Leonia, Ridgefield Park, Fairview, Cliffside Park, Fort Lee…
It saddens me when I go back home to NJ.
Facts are facts.Oh good, that makes me feel much better. Now I understand about the large number of synagogues and Christian churches in Saudi Arabia and the tremendous freedom those communities enjoy under Islamic rule . . . . .
Sick! The whole thing is sick…Saudi court mulls verdict to cut defendant’s spine
He caused paralysis to another man during a fight and the victim is insisting that he should suffer the same injury
By StaffPublished Thursday, August 19, 2010
A court in Saudi Arabia is seeking medical advice on whether it is possible to cut the spinal cord of a man as a punishment after he was indicted of causing paralysis to another man during a fight, a local daily reported on Thursday.
The court in the northwestern province of Tabuk has sent letters to hospitals in the kingdom asking them whether the punishment to cripple the defendant by severing his spine is medically possible, the Arabic language daily Okaz said.
The unidentified defendant hit Abdul Aziz Al Mutairi, another Saudi, with a cleaver during a fight more than two years ago and the trial has been delayed because Mutairi is insisting that his attacker suffer the same injury.
“The General Court in Tabuk has sent several letters to hospitals in and outside the region asking doctors about the possibility of cutting the spinal cord of the defendant after he was indicted of causing paralysis to another man,” it said.
The paper quoted the 22-year-old Mutairi as saying the defendant had confessed in court to hitting him with the cleaver during their fight in Tabuk.
“King Khaled Hospital is of the opinion that it is possible to cut the spinal cord and cause paralysis medically through specialist centres,” he said.
According to the paper, the verdict is pending responses from hospitals to the court’s letters.
Intolerent… perhaps… because you know, muslims are VERY tolerant toward us…I live in Jersey City. Muslims haven’t “taken over” Jersey City. They are just one of many ethnic groups there. You really are intolerant.
She isn’t calling you a name mate. Taqqiya is (I believe) a Shia doctrine whereby, if necessary to prevent persecution, a Muslim may lie about their faith.Sticks and stones, my dear, sticks and stones. You have no argument so you resort to name-calling.
I know but since Muslims do taqqiya she’s slyly saying I’m a Muslim.She isn’t calling you a name mate. Taqqiya is (I believe) a Shia doctrine whereby, if necessary to prevent persecution, a Muslim may lie about their faith.
Ahh, my mistake.I know but since Muslims do taqqiya she’s slyly saying I’m a Muslim.
I’ve been accused of being a secret Muslim a number of times on these boards because I stick up for them when people attempt to stereotype them.
AmenSo let’s not follow their example.
I am an aussie and i dont remember this even as you do i remembered it as a racial issue but you now show it was about Muslims. could you please post for us your source. I ask this because i am a poor reader i read some info of the web i know wiki is not a secureThere is no way sharia law will ever be allowed to take hold in Australia. In the past we have had problems with muslims, it led to an outcry. For eg, when some innocent lifesavers were bashed up by muslims in Sydney a few years ago, the result was mass protests against them, there was riots on the beach where it happened& basically anyone of middle eastern decent went near cronulla beach, they were targeted. I personally don’t condone the attacks etc, but the protest was needed. There was also a part of Sydney that wanted to open up a large Islamic school, thousand protested and as a result, the school will not be built. Australia doesn’t take things like this lightly. If anything, it’s a good way to keep this idea at bay, if anyone even hinted that oz should become sharia, God help that person