K
KathleenT
Guest
Ahhh, that makes much more sense.
Why not? Chivalry is exactly what we’re talking about, and rephrasing that to immediately sound like a positive (gentleman) is dishonest since it would imply that guys, who are not doing those things, are not gentlemen.First of all, I have avoided the use of the word chivalry. I really don’t like that word. So I will answer your question, reworded a bit. Do I think being a gentleman leads towards outdated views on women?
Again, you’re twisting it to suit you. Lack of chivalry doesn’t mean that women aren’t being treated with respect and dignity.Again, I do not see how having a mindset that women should be treated with respect and dignity can lead to treating women poorly or having the view that women are inferior. If anything, it should lead to the opposite.
I agree that women are more sexualised than men, although unfortunately men are becoming more sexualised as well.Without fail, if a woman is in a lead role (eg as a detective), she is always dressed in a overly sexy fashion, tintilating even. The men in the same position are always dressed rather conservatively or normal.
Again, you’re conflating ‘being a gentleman’ and ‘chivalrous’ together. You would make a good politicianSo I would hope, in a small way, that learning to act as gentlemen towards women will lead back to an outdated view of women: Women being respected for their femininity.
A male friend of mine once complained how he had paid movie tickets and his date wouldn’t even give him a kiss. When I told him that paying for the date doesn’t make him entitled to anything, he got annoyed and said that he would just not bother going out of his way then.I did not hear such stuff from radical feminists but from men themselves. I also heard it from my parents who told me to pay my own way when out on a date to prevent this expectation from taking place.
That’s the thing though. Men are just as important and valuable. They should not be treated as less worthy at all.Women, you are different. Y’all are in no ways less valuable than men, in several ways more valuable (forgive the imprecision of language; you know the sentiment In getting at) and worthy of respect. By men, you ought to be held as more sacred and worthy of protection.
Dressed up in nice language but that essentially implies that a womans value is her womb. I think women want to be seen as more than wombs.Alice von Hildebrand wrote and spoke regularly on the special dignity of women. She wrote of a book called “The Privilege of Being a Woman.” It addresses the sacred reality of a being a potential life-giver, and the womb being a holy place where God creates life. I believe her point is that this is where the special efforts to show a higher level of care and respect for women comes from .
And that one goes back to the seeing women as delicate argument.Women used to be treated carefully as it was believed that they were more physically and emotionally sensitive. It was thought they could seriously injure themselves or their babies if they worked or exercised like men. It was also a thought that women’s emotions were more finely tuned than men’s and that they could be damaged with too much stress in their lives.
Why don’t I like the term chivalry? Because, of its obvious medieval origins, it implies it is archaic, or as others have said European, applies to nobility. In other words, it implies it is no longer applicable. There is absolutely nothing dishonest about how I reworded the question. Let me be clear, all else being equal, a man who does these things for women (open doors, pull back their chairs, pay for dinner, etc) is more gentlemanly than a man who does not. Nothing dishonest about that. And even if I used the term chivalry, a man who does them is more chivalrous than a man who does not. Again, nothing dishonest at all, just an opinion. You are ok with the second opinion because of the word chivalry, as opposed to gentlemanly, precisely because it implies something archaic that does not apply any longer. But to make you happy, and to avoid accusations of dishonesty, I will use the terms interchangeably from here on.Why not? Chivalry is exactly what we’re talking about, and rephrasing that to immediately sound like a positive (gentleman) is dishonest since it would imply that guys, who are not doing those things, are not gentlemen.
I have twisted nothing. I never said that lack of chivalry (happy? I used your term) implies one does not treat women with respect or dignity. What I said was that with respect to the question you asked, ie does it lead to outdated views on women? And my answer was no (qualifying the outdated views on women). In other words, treating women with respect does not lead to treating women with no respect. You twisted my words, not the other way around. A implies B is not equivalent the B implies A.Again, you’re twisting it to suit you. Lack of chivalry doesn’t mean that women aren’t being treated with respect and dignity.
From the dictionary : gentleman: a chivalrous, courteous, or honorable man.Again, you’re conflating ‘being a gentleman’ and ‘chivalrous’ together. You would make a good politicia
It shoes a deference to women that they deserve, due to their femininity. Just so I do not get accused of dishonesty for now using a new word. Deference: humble submission and respect.So answer this, how does opening a door (I decided to distill this down) show respect for femininity, and why?
That is a good point. I realize the intent is to honor women as “lifegivers” or something like that, but I can tell you that hearing these types of sentiments is painful to women suffering from infertility, and no doubt to many childless single women as well.Dressed up in nice language but that essentially implies that a womans value is her womb. I think women want to be seen as more than wombs.