Yes, in hell, but why forever

  • Thread starter Thread starter MaximilianK
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
They are given chances until death. We have God’s word written on our hearts… we have a conscience.
I knew you would say that. But that is why my example is different. In my example, the father and the son will die, therefore it really is over at death. In your example, God is eternal, and the human’s soul is eternal. Therefore, no reason for the decision to be based on the blink-of-an eye earth life.
 
God made us in his own image… with free will. Being unable to choose against him is not freedom.
 
Last edited:
And that is worse than keeping them “alive” to suffer for eternity?
It has the virtue of respecting our freedom to choose.

If we want to be apart from God, God loves us enough to allow us to walk away… forever.
 
And that is worse than keeping them “alive” to suffer for eternity?
Keep in mind that that ‘suffering’ is knowledge of eternal separation from God… which is what they chose by their actions. It’s not an imposed condition; it’s a freely chosen one. There’s no injustice there.
 
Keep in mind that that ‘suffering’ is knowledge of eternal separation from God… which is what they chose by their actions. It’s not an imposed condition; it’s a freely chosen one. There’s no injustice there.
I could have chosen not to be born, so, my will was not allowed.
 
It has the virtue of respecting our freedom to choose.

If we want to be apart from God, God loves us enough to allow us to walk away… forever.
I could accept that under the annihilation scenario, not under an eternal suffering one.
 
I could have chosen not to be born, so, my will was not allowed.
Before you’re born, you have no ‘will’, so … no, that’s not true. 😉

Once you have a will – that is, once you’re alive and able to freely use your intellect – you have free use of your will.
 
Before you’re born, you have no ‘will’, so … no , that’s not true. 😉

Once you have a will – that is, once you’re alive and able to freely use your intellect – you have free use of your will.
I will to be annihilated. My will is not being done.
 
I will to be annihilated. My will is not being done.
There’s a difference between “will” and “act.” You can will it all you like… but, just like jumping off a cliff and flying away, there’s a difference between “free will” and “free act.”

In this case, ‘annihilation’ is impossible. Having been created, it would be unjust to annihilate you; therefore, God – who is just – does not annihilate anyone.

However, you’ve exercised your will! Congratulations! 😉
 
In this case, ‘annihilation’ is impossible. Having been created, it would be unjust to annihilate you; therefore, God – who is just – does not annihilate anyone.
I disagree, eternal life is unjust.
 
I disagree, eternal life is unjust.
🤣

OK, I’ll bite: why, pray tell, is eternal life unjust?
And no, I certainly haven’t.
You certainly have. You have a free will, not an omnipotence do do whatever you wish.
40.png
laylow:
Anyone who is kept alive against their will is being treated unjustly.
Here’s the counter-example that disproves your assertion:
Suppose I murder someone, and am justly convicted of life in prison. However, seeing that I’m never going to get out, I desire to die immediately. Is it unjust to keep me alive against my will, given that it’s just that I experience the consequences of my action?

Clearly, the answer is “no”. See how easy it is, when you think about it a little? 😉
 
Why would you choose to be annihilated than to love God? It’s interesting that you want God to love you but you never want to love God enough to do what needs doing.
 
OK, I’ll bite: why , pray tell, is eternal life unjust?
I can’t think of a more terrifying future. Everything new will eventually have been exhausted, leaving conscience nothingness.
You certainly have. You have a free will , not an omnipotence do do whatever you wish.
That’s quite a leap, from one individual decision to…omnipotence!
Suppose I murder someone, and am justly convicted of life in prison. However, seeing that I’m never going to get out, I desire to die immediately. Is it unjust to keep me alive against my will, given that it’s just that I experience the consequences of my action?

Clearly, the answer is “no”. See how easy it is, when you think about it a little? 😉
A true eye-for-an-eye scenario would allow for the murderer to be murdered in the same manner as their victim. Would this be the just thing to do? I suppose it depends. In reality, I figure if they murderer was able to take his victim out, he probably wouldn’t need to rely on someone else to take himself out, so I don’t know if your real world example would ever really play out. I have no problem with him wanting to end his life. I couldn’t judge why he committed the murders in the first place without knowing his situation.
 
Last edited:
Why would you choose to be annihilated than to love God? It’s interesting that you want God to love you but you never want to love God enough to do what needs doing.
Strawman

 
Not at all… I can only work with what you say.
Except that’s not what I said. It is a complete misrepresentation of what I said. I do not believe I said anything about loving God. You do you love something you can’t interact with?
 
He sins because we are inclined to sin.
We are inclined to do what we think is best in the moment. I cannot argue this, it has to be verified by the individual. One has to examine his past actions, and rather than condemn, seek to understand. We are inclined toward satisfaction, fulfillment, but desire blinds us.
He is weak and gives in to desire and doesn’t rely on God to help him.
Yes, it can be seen as a human “weakness” that we become blinded to the significance of our own consciences. However, this blindness in itself has a purpose in our nature, and is beautiful in function. We can look back and say “I should have… I shouldn’t have…” but like the crowd who hung Jesus, when we are caught up in desire these moral precepts lose their weight. Later, when we are regretting, the precepts regain their significance. At the later state, we are in a position of “full knowledge and full consent”, not when we are caught up in desire.
If he were to look for the way of escape that God always gives us to avoid sin whenever we are tempted, he would actually be able to resist and this gets easier with practice.
The “practice” is in contemplative prayer. It means being in connection with God at the moment, which is rare and involves a lot of discipline. Most people walk around fairly unconscious.
Not all people do regret sins, though… resentment is an example of this.
We are using “resentment” differently, I think. I am using it as “holding something against someone”.
People who do not regret sins have a poorly developed conscience.
his selfishness kicked in
All desires are essentially for the benefit of the self. God wants us to take care of ourselves.
He put this desire, this love of self, before God and before his knowledge of right and wrong
This is the accusation, but this “putting before” is not deliberate in terms of intent (with some rare exceptions also involving blindness). Again, you would have to verify this in yourself. Think of a past sin, did you intend to downplay God, or did you want to stay with God, and do the sin too? I am sure you had this going on in a mind distorted by desire.
it’s like a downward spiral. Sin begets sin.
When we discipline ourselves to sin, we repress the desires and ideas that lead to sin. “What is repressed gets expressed” as the saying goes. The repressed desires will come to overwhelm us in certain circumstances. The way to deal with this is a life of prayer that leads to awareness in the moment, being able to step back from desire when it arises and just watch it, rather than push it down and condemn it.

We can reconcile with our God-given appetites.
 
It admits of no answer. I can’t answer “yes, I want to change the judgment”, since that’s impossible; I can’t answer “no, I don’t want to change the judgment”, since there’s no changing the judgment. You can “leave it” wherever you wish – but the question is unanswerable.
I wasn’t talking about a judgment. I was talking about an individual’s choice.

Now that I have clarified that, let’s take another look at the question. I respect that in your own mind, you cannot separate the words “hell” and “judgment”, so I will reword the question.

Your adult child has already chosen to be addicted to heroin. Bizarre as it seems, he is not addicted now, but this is what he wants. Let us also assume, in this bizarre scenario, that heroin addiction is completely inescapable. Assuming that you do not want him to make this choice, you have tried everything within your power to convince him otherwise. You could simply give up let him have his way, but you also have an opportunity to override the inescapable, and give him the chance to experience, for a short time, the worst part of being an addict and then quickly stop and change his mind. You have this magical ability for him to have this experience, this opportunity.

Would you take the opportunity, or would you let him have his way?
Wow. Self-aggrandize much, eh?
My apologies if that sounded self-aggrandizing. Gorgias, I am telling you that there are ways to develop your relationship with God. If you are seeing God as judgmental, that image is very normal and natural, but there is a Father that can be found deeper within who loves and forgives unconditionally. He forgives “before always”, before He even created us. The conscience resists this image, of course, because we want to hang onto blame of our selves and others, the blame helps a bit in avoidance of sin.

With development of empathy and love, being in touch with the Father who always loves and forgives, a person can avoid sin without hanging onto blame.
 
Except that’s not what I said. It is a complete misrepresentation of what I said. I do not believe I said anything about loving God. You do you love something you can’t interact with?
I don’t understand this. We can and do interact with God. This is primarily through prayer and charitable works, but also in answered prayers.
We are inclined to do what we think is best in the moment. I cannot argue this, it has to be verified by the individual. One has to examine his past actions, and rather than condemn, seek to understand. We are inclined toward satisfaction, fulfillment, but desire blinds us.
I disagree… we don’t necessarily think it is best in the moment. I’m not condemning, I’m speaking from personal experience. When I have chosen to sin, it’s not because I think it is best, anyway. I’ve knowingly chosen sin through desire and ignoring my conscience.
Yes, it can be seen as a human “weakness” that we become blinded to the significance of our own consciences. However, this blindness in itself has a purpose in our nature, and is beautiful in function. We can look back and say “I should have… I shouldn’t have…” but like the crowd who hung Jesus, when we are caught up in desire these moral precepts lose their weight. Later, when we are regretting, the precepts regain their significance. At the later state, we are in a position of “full knowledge and full consent”, not when we are caught up in desire.
You said yourself in your example that they regret what they’ve done. Yet they’ve apparently made no attempt to alter their future behaviour. God gives us a way of escape. If they truly regret, they will try self mastery. This eventually leads to finding the way out. I’m again speaking from personal experience.
The “practice” is in contemplative prayer. It means being in connection with God at the moment, which is rare and involves a lot of discipline. Most people walk around fairly unconscious.
The practice is in actively wanting to avoid sinning for love of God, and seeking the way of escape, besides prayer and the sacraments to strengthen us.
We are using “resentment” differently, I think. I am using it as “holding something against someone”.
People who do not regret sins have a poorly developed conscience.
I was also meaning it as holding a grudge. Agreed that it’s a poorly developed conscience.
All desires are essentially for the benefit of the self. God wants us to take care of ourselves.
Yet God also tells us that everyone who loves the Father does his will… and that we are to be born again to overcome the slavery of sin.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top