Terrible examples dawkins.Wonder, if he gets sick, if he’s going to reject “atheistic” antibiotic protocols.
Or if his toilet backs up, he’ll refuse to consider “atheistic” plumbing.
Or…
Great question. Truth has imbedded itself in successive generations. Somehow evolution is not ringing true.
Perfect examples. Antibiotic protocols are designed according to evolutionary theory. And of course, plumbing is methodologically naturalistic, just like science.
Natural antibiotics were known to man long ago. Perhaps not by the modern term. Antibiotics mostly were derived from natural sources, synthesized in the lab because they could get patent protection and make money.
Slowly but surely. For the first time, four years ago, the Gallup Poll had an absolute majority of Americans accepting evolution. It had been a plurality for many years, but in recent years, at least 50% have accepted the basic theory of biology. The high water mark for creationism was 47%, and it has now declined to 44%.
But not bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Nor was the mechanism of antibiotic resistance understood until natural selection was discovered. Antibiotic protocols use evolutionary theory to most effectively apply antibiotics in a way that delays the evolution of antibiotic resistance.
Acceptance of evolution apparently has little to do with the educational level of Americans. Americans who often need remedial courses in writing and other basics when entering college. You are simply measuring the results of a propaganda campaign.
That is false, I know more about evolution now than I did and reject it still, the smarter and more educated on gets they will drop stupid thins like evolution
historyb is a marvellous role model for the idea that high intelligence and deep learning result in the rejection of the stupidity of modern biology. Keep it up, historyb, you don’t realise just how much good you are doing.
And what comic books have you been reading?
Organisms have adaptive capability. So I would reword this - Be careful… an adaptation could take place.
…it is to some non-Christian religions–their deity/ies can be male and female and animal and a multiplural being… if you are Catholic, He can only BE YAHWEH, GOD, your FATHER (or BROTHER) (of MALE GIVER of LIFE)!
No. Populations have adaptive capability. It’s random mutation and natural selection. And yes, it’s been tested and observed to happen. However, the genomes of individuals are not adaptive; they remain the same for a lifetime.
Yep. Evolution. That’s what adaptation is. Gotta tell you, as a teacher, I often use “change over time” or “adaptation” early on, and it’s interesting to see the reactions when they realize what it is.
Hi, Jerry-Jet!
OK. I see, I think. Do you think that was why Mary was made co-redemptress, because people were missing the female principle in Catholicism?
So we should all accept that the Earth was created 6,000 years ago, at a time when the Mesopotamians already were brewing beer?
Mary was cooperative right from the beginning. Naming her the cooperating redemptrix (co-redemptrix) is a formality.
But this was a recent development, no? I think I remember it happened around 1991 or so.