your opinions on gays

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gingerfish
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
How would you treat a homosexual person who is living according to the teachings of the Church?

I also mean there, that they are attending Courage meetings and the like, so they’re not totally “in the closet” about the issue.
If they are celibate than that is perfectly fine. However if Adam is going to Church and then going home and shacking up with Steve, then we have a serious issue.
 
If they are celibate than that is perfectly fine. However if Adam is going to Church and then going home and shacking up with Steve, then we have a serious issue.
By the same token, if Adam is going to church and shacking up with Eve, we still have a serious issue.

Celibacy requires abstaining from sex outside of marriage, whoever might be participating in that sex. As a divorced Catholic, I have the same enjoinder as the homosexual Catholic…no marriage = no sex.
 
By the same token, if Adam is going to church and shacking up with Eve, we still have a serious issue.

Celibacy requires abstaining from sex outside of marriage, whoever might be participating in that sex. As a divorced Catholic, I have the same enjoinder as the homosexual Catholic…no marriage = no sex.
True, but homosexual fornication is even more sinful.
 
Do any of us truly stop sinning?
You need to understand the difference between intent and action.

Yes, we all sin. But to go to confession with no intent of stopping what you confess is wrong.

If someone is doing that and justifying their actions by saying we all sin then they are just making excuses for themselves to continue in their sin. It’s doesn’t fool God.🤷
 
Do any of us truly stop sinning?
No, but we are to work toward that goal.

What shall we say, then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
God forbid! For we that are dead to sin, how shall we live any longer therein?
Know you not that all we who are baptized in Christ Jesus are baptized in his death?
For we are buried together with him by baptism into death: that, as Christ is risen from the dead by the glory of the Father, so we also may walk in newness of life. Roman 6:1-4

Be you therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect.
Matthew 5:48

and the starting point toward that goal is with Jesus and following His teachings.
 
This is very enlightening to me! SSA therefore does not necessarily mean “sexual desire for the same sex”, but it could also mean “want to be like them”, or “idolizing them”. In such cases I would say that SSA is not homosexuality.

I think LittleDeb’s belief is right, that we now have imperfect nature. And I would like to add, that this imperfect nature is often assumed by man as his true nature, the nature that is imperfect.
I think though that we still disagree on the point of the orientation being a sin. It can’t be a sin with what I was expressing. Fitswimmer’s question had to do with identifying sexual orientation. When I spoke of finding people attractive it was finding them NOT sexually attractive, merely attractive in general. There is a difference. I can identify certain people as attractive in general, without ever having been sexually attracted to members of my own sex. People with SSA also find some people just plain attractive without a sexual attraction. That was not my point.

Same sex attraction is about finding some people of the same sex sexually attractive. SSA is homosexuality. The sexual attraction is not a sin since it is not a choice. The action is a sin because it is a choice.

For something to be a sin it has to be chosen. Actions are chosen, orientation is not.

I hope that helps clear things up.
 
Please consider reading this letter by Archbishop Chaput of Denver. He is considered a very “orthodox” Bishop…
Hey rlg94086, the spokesman for the Archdiocese of St. Paul/Minneapolis seems to get the distinction, as well 🙂

From the thread “Father, lesbian daughter prohibited from speaking at Catholic church”:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=193105

"Dennis McGrath, spokester [sic] for the Archdiocese of St. Paul/Minneapolis, said that because of Curoe’s active lesbian lifestyle and the related content in the book, “the parish was asked not to hold the event.” McGrath said, “We welcome gay and lesbian members into the church, but they have the same rules of the road as heterosexuals.” Those rules dictate that there will be no sexual activity outside the bonds of marriage, he said."
 
Hey rlg94086, the spokesman for the Archdiocese of St. Paul/Minneapolis seems to get the distinction, as well 🙂

From the thread “Father, lesbian daughter prohibited from speaking at Catholic church”:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=193105

"Dennis McGrath, spokester [sic] for the Archdiocese of St. Paul/Minneapolis, said that because of Curoe’s active lesbian lifestyle and the related content in the book, “the parish was asked not to hold the event.” McGrath said, “We welcome gay and lesbian members into the church, but they have the same rules of the road as heterosexuals.” Those rules dictate that there will be no sexual activity outside the bonds of marriage, he said."
👍
 
I think though that we still disagree on the point of the orientation being a sin. It can’t be a sin with what I was expressing. Fitswimmer’s question had to do with identifying sexual orientation. When I spoke of finding people attractive it was finding them NOT sexually attractive, merely attractive in general. There is a difference. I can identify certain people as attractive in general, without ever having been sexually attracted to members of my own sex. People with SSA also find some people just plain attractive without a sexual attraction. That was not my point.

Same sex attraction is about finding some people of the same sex sexually attractive. SSA is homosexuality. The sexual attraction is not a sin since it is not a choice. The action is a sin because it is a choice.

For something to be a sin it has to be chosen. Actions are chosen, orientation is not.

I hope that helps clear things up.
Maybe it would help a bit if you tell us just what is meant by “sexual orientation”. What is the difference between saying, “What is the sex of a person” and " What is the sexual orientation of a person".?
 
Actually, wouldn’t unnatural sex always be more sinful than natural sex, if you follow through with the theo-logic?
They both get you to the same place dont they?

I dont think that there is a priority line to get into hell.

But there might be a “get a number and wait for it to come up to be served” system, just to start the torment early 🙂
 
Maybe it would help a bit if you tell us just what is meant by “sexual orientation”. What is the difference between saying, “What is the sex of a person” and " What is the sexual orientation of a person".?
The sex of a person is purely biological. With some exceptions, a person is clearly female or male. The exceptions are those with mixed up chromosomes and ambiguous or partial genitalia.

The sexual orientation has to do with the attraction to others. The categories are generally considered heterosexual (attracted to opposite sex), homosexual (attracted to the same sex) and bisexual (attracted to both). As a couple of people have mentioned, it are not necessarily hard/fast categories. It may be a spectrum, whereby from an attraction standpoint a bisexual person would be in the middle with varying strengths of attraction on both ends. However, I wouldn’t consider it a bell curve, because the vast majority of people are heterosexual.

We don’t know the cause of homosexual tendencies. The cause is irrellevant to the teaching of the Church. Sin occurs when the tendencies are acted upon.
 
They both get you to the same place dont they?

I dont think that there is a priority line to get into hell.

But there might be a “get a number and wait for it to come up to be served” system, just to start the torment early.
Thank you for bring the bigger issue into light. Gay people are going to hell, unless they are celibate, right?
 
Thank you for bring the bigger issue into light. Gay people are going to hell, unless they are celibate, right?
Well, your question is worded a little backwards in light of Church teaching. Unrepented mortal sin bars all of us from heaven regardless of sexual orientation. The Church has only ever definitively declared who is, in fact, in heaven. She doesn’t speculate on who, personally, may be in hell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top