J
jericho777
Guest
For me it’s been 20+ years out of the CC and walking with the Lord. The more I read scripture the more I see Calvin-Augustine-Paul teaching. I prefer to go back to the original source the bible and get a pure unadulterated view of what God Himself says and thinks. Not that others can’t give insight they do. People reject the part of Augustine that is Calvinistic because it is contrary to the church teachings.believe it or not my friend, i was right where you are at 25 years ago. i said the same “sinners prayer” you did. i had the same “life changing” phenomenon happen. as stated many times, im a former baptist, who had strong calvinistic leanings. i also would have defended osas to the max. too long a story to relate here. but some things doctrinally never made any sense. and i always had this inexplicable pull to the Catholic Church. wish i would have acted on it sooner, it could have saved me years of searching and heartache. i agree with you. we become a new creation. but it is not just a one time prayer and thats it. it is not just a onetime turning away from sin getting baptized and thats it. it is a lifetime process. it states many times in scripture those that are BEING saved. etc. it is a lifetime process. for the thief on the Cross, it was a “deathbed” conversion. if however the thief had survived the cross, i believe he would have submitted to the apostles teaching, and he would have lived a life of charity and good works. you are right we become a new creation. but we are warned to put the old man to death. that is a process. not a one time thing. we are also given many warning about such throughout the new testament. shall i just then go by easy believism? or follow what the scriptures, tradition, and the Church say. because my friend, if i do not listen to the ones God has set above me “the magestirium” then i do not listen to Christ. Peace![]()
The thief did die and was totally saved pointing to the sufficiency of his prayer. How ever your implication that the thief would have submitted himself to the apostles teaching is an attempt to justify the CC and its teachings. The apostles never had an ever expanding array of doctrine. It was limited and fixed. Men have tied unbiblical burdens and requirements for salvation. Things that were necessary for salvation in the first century are different than things required for salvation today. It’s a different gospel! Where is the Sabbath rest promised by Jesus where we cease from our labour to be saved? It’s not in the works of the flesh trying to be saved or the doctrines of men binding their consciences.
Salvation is a lifelong journey we were saved we are saved we will be saved. This speaks to Christ being the author and finisher of our faith. Remember He is the one doing the saving not us. We are saved unto good works Eph 2:10 not by them. That’s why I hold to OSAS
You assume OSAS is somehow a license to keep on living the way we were and that’s simply not true. I don’t know how better to explain it.
Jesus has delivered a simple unburdened faith to us let’s keep it that way.