12 Russian intel officers indicted for DNC hacking in Mueller investigation

[HarryStotle]

Ridgerunner:

LeafByNiggle:

Let’s face it. There is nothing Mueller can say that would convince you of anything since you have such a low opinion of him and assume the worst about him. Based on his record, there is no justification for that attitude.

There was at first, until I learned more about his history, like letting those innocent men die in prison when he was in Boston. And Weissman is practically a criminal, called down for unethical behavior by judges in the past. Why hire someone like that? And for that matter, why Strzok? Mueller had to know Strzok was instrumental in creating the “Russia collusion” myth to begin with.

You talk about trumped up charges against the Trump campaign, but here you are making trumped up denigrations of Mueller. Have you been reading Breitbart again?

No need the read Breitbart. Tune into Strzok’s appearances before the Congressional hearing to realize something is seriously amiss.

Be sure to turn down the credulity dial when you do. Just a little more willingness to be critical of what you are willing to purchase would be in order.

 

[LeafByNiggle]

LeafByNiggle:

The investigation is not destroying or even threatening our system of government.

There is undoubtedly not a single person in the administration today who does not have at least some distraction from the Mueller criminalization of everyone Mueller thinks might drop a dime on Trump.

That is their choice to behave that way. You can’t blame Mueller for that.

 

[LeafByNiggle]

LeafByNiggle:

Ridgerunner:

LeafByNiggle:

Let’s face it. There is nothing Mueller can say that would convince you of anything since you have such a low opinion of him and assume the worst about him. Based on his record, there is no justification for that attitude.

There was at first, until I learned more about his history, like letting those innocent men die in prison when he was in Boston. And Weissman is practically a criminal, called down for unethical behavior by judges in the past. Why hire someone like that? And for that matter, why Strzok? Mueller had to know Strzok was instrumental in creating the “Russia collusion” myth to begin with.

You talk about trumped up charges against the Trump campaign, but here you are making trumped up denigrations of Mueller. Have you been reading Breitbart again?

No need the read Breitbart. Tune into Strzok’s appearances before the Congressional hearing to realize something is seriously amiss.

Be sure to turn down the credulity dial when you do. Just a little more willingness to be critical of what you are willing to purchase would be in order.

I did watch the Strzok appearance before Congress, and I apparently drew an entirely different conclusion from it than you did.

 

[HarryStotle]

I did watch the Strzok appearance before Congress, and I apparently drew an entirely different conclusion from it than you did.

Ideological presuppositions can do funny things to perceptions.

I wonder what hindsight Strzok’s wife could report after the fact. I would think she supposed his fidelity and honesty just as you do.

 

[Ridgerunner]

You talk about trumped up charges against the Trump campaign, but here you are making trumped up denigrations of Mueller. Have you been reading Breitbart again?

I don’t read Breitbart. I have nothing against it particularly. I just don’t read it.

Mueller’s shameful record regarding the wrongfully imprisoned men in Boston in the Bolger case is in a lot of places. Alan Dershowitz, no conservative but who lives in Boston and followed the case, is extremely critical of Mueller in that matter. Basically Mueller let two men die in prison when he knew full well they were innocent.

And Mueller, of course, headed the FBI during the Uranium One deal, and knew all about it.

 

[Hereiam]

This indictment is a sham.

This Presidency is a sham…all hail the Traitor in Chief.

 

[F_Marturana]

Mueller’s shameful record regarding the wrongfully imprisoned men in Boston in the Bolger case is in a lot of places

It’s been debunked.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bo...lger-don-hold/kDPSq2ek8xDTFiPZix4yoL/amp.html

What involvement did Mueller have with Bulger?

None. Mueller served in the US attorney’s office in Boston from 1982 to 1988, as chief of the criminal division, first assistant US attorney, and as acting US attorney for more than a year. During that time, Bulger ran a sprawling criminal enterprise and got away with murders because he was a longtime FBI informant who corrupted his handlers.

 

[LeafByNiggle]

LeafByNiggle:

I did watch the Strzok appearance before Congress, and I apparently drew an entirely different conclusion from it than you did.

Ideological presuppositions can do funny things to perceptions.

I wonder what hindsight Strzok’s wife could report after the fact. I would think she supposed his fidelity and honesty just as you do.

Strzok’s marital fidelity has no bearing on his testimony or the work of the FBI in general. As for his honesty in what he said before Congress, it made me proud of our FBI.

 

[Ridgerunner]

It’s been debunked.

I’m sure liberals will say it is. But frankly, I would believe Dershowitz before some liberal hack for the Globe. Here’s Dershowitz:

“He’s the guy who kept four innocent people in prison for many years in order to protect the cover of Whitey Bulger as an FBI informer. Those of us in Boston don’t have such a high regard for Mueller because we remember this story. The government had to pay out tens of millions of dollars because Whitey Bulger, a notorious mass murderer, became a government informer against the mafia . . .”

If Dershowitz, who was a law professor at Harvard at the time, is even half right, this country has turned its law enforcement over to an awful person. And his appointment of Weissman only makes him look worse. Weissman is the one who destroyed Arthur Anderson Co and cost thousands of people their jobs, but was later overruled by a court that found the company was innocent of Weissman’s charges.

 

[LeafByNiggle]

LeafByNiggle:

You talk about trumped up charges against the Trump campaign, but here you are making trumped up denigrations of Mueller. Have you been reading Breitbart again?

Mueller’s shameful record regarding the wrongfully imprisoned men in Boston in the Bolger case is in a lot of places.

The record is not nearly as damning to Mueller as you imagine. Learn more about it here.

 

[Ridgerunner]

The Boston Globe’s miscellaneous staffer you’re quoting is actually arguing detail with Hannity. I don’t care about that. If Dershowitz, who is a long way from being a conservative, says what he does about Mueller, that has a lot of credibility.

 

[LeafByNiggle]

The Boston Globe’s miscellaneous staffer you’re quoting is actually arguing detail with Hannity. I don’t care about that. If Dershowitz, who is a long way from being a conservative, says what he does about Mueller, that has a lot of credibility.

Nope. I trust the facts presented by the Boston Globe more than I trust the opinions of Dershowitz, a Washington Examiner contributor, who, by the way, does not denigrate Mueller nearly as much as you do.

 

[Ridgerunner]

Nope. I trust the facts presented by the Boston Globe more than I trust the opinions of Dershowitz, a Washington Examiner contributor.

Not good. Mueller opposed clemency for those innocent men even though his agency knew they were innocent. A judge actually found that and awarded the ones who were still alive and the families of the ones who unjustly died in prison $101 million dollars.

From the very article you cited:

“US District Judge Nancy Gertner found that the FBI deliberately withheld evidence that the four men were innocent and that the bureau helped cover up the injustice for decades. She ordered the government to pay the men and their families $101.7 million.”

I don’t even particularly like Dershowitz because he’s so liberal. But as a former Harvard professor of law, and author or dozens of books on the law, I’ll take his understanding over some staffer at the Boston Globe.

 

[LeafByNiggle]

LeafByNiggle:

Nope. I trust the facts presented by the Boston Globe more than I trust the opinions of Dershowitz, a Washington Examiner contributor.

Not good. Mueller opposed clemency for those innocent men even though his agency knew they were innocent. A judge actually found that and awarded the ones who were still alive and the families of the ones who unjustly died in prison $101 million dollars.

From the very article you cited:

“US District Judge Nancy Gertner found that the FBI deliberately withheld evidence that the four men were innocent and that the bureau helped cover up the injustice for decades. She ordered the government to pay the men and their families $101.7 million.”

Judge Gertner also said:

“Absolutely nothing in the record that I saw suggested Mueller’s involvement in any way in either the initial acts that led to the four men’s imprisonment, or the acts that ended in their continued imprisonment and denying them parole or the coverup.”

Got anything else?

 

[F_Marturana]

Just because he’s a lawyer doesn’t mean he’s right on what Mueller’s job was in Boston, and how it had nothing to do with Bulger.

 

[petra22]

Just wondering… if Hilary has used the government server like she was supposed to instead of a private server in her closet at home… would her e-mails or the e-mails of the DNC been hacked???

 

[LeafByNiggle]

Just wondering… if Hilary has used the government server like she was supposed to instead of a private server in her closet at home… would her e-mails or the e-mails of the DNC been hacked???

This is confusing two different e-mail issues. The government server issue was for her official work as Secretary of State. The DNC emails would not use the same server in any case since it is not part of the government.

 

[petra22]

Bendhazi! and then look the other way or worse, seek to intimidate FBI officials, while a foreign adversary steals the election for Trump.

You come out with this stuff. When the Rosenstien said specifically NO votes were tampered with. No election was compromised…No citizen knowingly cooperated with foreign entities… NO, NO, NO. And still you try to smear. Lie, Lie, Lie.

 

[Boatswain2PA]

This Presidency is a sham…all hail the Traitor in Chief.

Nothing but deep hatred here.

 

[F_Marturana]

Yes.

She had a private server when she was Secretary of State. She stopped being Secretary of State in 2013. The server then was brought offline.

The DNC emails were hacked in 2016.