Because it was an experience of a people - industrialized death, death as a production line brought about by one of the most civilized countries in the world ‘gone mad’. The Shoah was unique not because of the numbers but because of the whole way in which it was carried out - the programmed efficiency of a modern industrialized society.
And how it this different than the 10 mil Ukranians, Kazahks and others who were systematically robbed of all their food and left to starve or deported to the Gulag by the state apparatus of the Soviet Union?
I wonder just why you feel it necessary to colonize this - I don’t feel it necessary to colonize or minimize the experience of the Irish in ‘The Famine’ for example, neither do I feel it necessary to colonize or minimize the experience of, say, the Armenians. I don’t find it necessary to say to somebody Irish “more people died in famines in China, India and the Ukraine so stop making fuss” or, to an Armenian “hey, look at Rwanda, you people want to pretend that what happened to you was worse than anybody else”.
Have you ever heard an Irish person object to the use of the term famine for Ethiopia or Sudan?
I think not.
Jews should be expressing solidarity with other groups that have suffered Genocide.
The Jewish Holocaust was not the first Genocide (Armenians), not the largest by number (Ukranians), not the highest proportionate to population (Cambodia).
I had the privelege of taking a course on Genocide with Prof. Eric Goldhagen of Harvard Univ. (a survivor of both the German and Soviet death apparatus during WWII). He pointed out repeatedly that Genocide is a far ranging 20th Century phenomenon that has appeared in many places and cultures. It is not unique to any group. By making it seem unique to a specific situation, we increase the chance that it happens again.
God Bless