D
dianaiad
Guest
But they aren’t.If the people building this are booking it as a sign of peace and reconciliation, then I will take them at their word.
You mean like the Dome of the Rock is considered as a monument to reconciliation and peace, as it sits on the site of the ancient JEWISH TEMPLE? The way all those mosques taking the place of the Chrsitian cathedrals are?Regardless of their intent, if you paint this building as a sign of reconciliation and peace and all Americans speak of it as such, then that is likely how it will be thought of as time passes.
I MIGHT consider that it is this, if Muslim practice were NOT to erect mosques as monuments of victory, taking the place of the sacred edifices of the defeated peoples. Their history, in other words, is working against them. I happen to be quite a fan of George Santayana…
Except that it will not. Calling it that is a remarkable example of Orwellian newspeak.If people make a decision for example to start referring to it as “The Reconciliation Center” for example, then that is what it will become over time.
No, my friend, it is an insult because every ounce of the intent is to insult. It doesn’t much matter what WE do about it…Muslim extremists will see it as an insult–and a hugely successful slap in the face…akin to clobbering your enemy with your shoe.If we pretend to see it as a ‘gesture of reconciliation,’ it will be even better for them; akin to our picking up the shoe they threw at us and licking the sole of it in gratitude.You will have defeated the intent of anyone who may have built it as an insult. If you paint it as an insult, it will be an insult.
In US law there used to be a concept called ‘fighting words’ that ameliorated…not the guilt of an assault, but the punishment for it. It was understood that some words, some insults were so unbearable as to be almost a physical attack against which self defense is permissable. Certainly Muslims live by this…look at what they do, and threaten to do, to people who merely draw cartoons or write books!
Turning the other cheek is an admirable idea. I’m not suggesting that we take violent action against these people. Shoot, I’m not even suggeting that we do something legal to stop them.As far as what might happen in other countries, you and I should focus on what happens in our country and how we act. Nothing will be settled by joining those who might be stepping down to the lowest behavior. By stepping to the higher behavior, then you have at least elevated your own being. Others may follow your example, but there will always be those who focus on lesser behavior.
But I see no need to pretend that their actions are anything other than what they are.
That is very true.If you read my other posts you will see that I don’t like nationalist identities or religious affiliations. I prefer to see just people. If you believe in God, then children of God is how I would see them. If they chose to divide themselves this way or that, I chose not to participate. If you have all of these human made identities and the divisions that follow, you will always have these situations to deal with. Look at the folks on the CAF website. Mormons fighting with Catholics, Protestants fighting with JW’s, and so on and so on. They are all Christians and they can’t even agree. Chances are they never will. They are spinning their wheels. This is how people will always act when they divide themselves, and by identifying with a man made identity, you will always be divided.
However, I AM a Mormon; that means that I am not (cough) a pacifist. I come from a fairly long line of people who have been on the receiving end of incredible intolerance, and I find myself unwilling to put up with more just because it is politically correct to do so.
…and that, sir, is the problem here. Everybody has this thing turned around. It is not those who are pointing out the insult that are being intolerant. It is the extremist Muslims who are actually promoting this thing that are exhibiting not merely intolerance, but an attitude of gloating victory that, frankly, makes my blood boil.
If they truly wanted to build something as a symbol of reconciliation and outreach, they would be building something dedicated to those who lost their lives—not to those who cheered the carnage.
That’s fine, but the fact remains that it doesn’t matter how often you call a dog a cat, it’s till going to bark at you.As for me, if this Mosque is intended as an insult, then I will chose to see it as an olive branch. I will make it such in my own heart and in how I speak of it. if someone intends it or speaks of it as something less, then they have denigrated only themselves.