K
KingTheoden
Guest
I have to respectfully disagree with some implications of what you wrote.Thank you, mpjw2. I believe you are closer to the truth than our friend SSPXguy who calls his fellow human beings a tool of satan, while failing to see his own failure to live the Gospel.
The purpoose behind the rites and rituals of the Faith is to facilitate our transformation into Christ and bring the Kingdom of God to the world through others’ experience of God through us. They are a means to an end, that is, Jesus Christ. Instead, they are treated to our self-centered arrogance at “being right”. Many think the rituals are ends to themselves, and treat others with hostility, and ostracism if they are the least bit reticent.
Sadly, people are too willing to sacrifice charity to promote their attachment to a certain way of expressing these means. There is a certain spiritual blindness brought on by the spiritual pride of “doing it right”. Those who participate do not know, neither do they care that they are going against the Will of God by causing divisiveness through disobedience and lack of charity and good will. They are right, and the “other guy” is in deep trouble. It is very troubling. The devil’s craftiest trick yet.
But, let’s face it, when it comes down to it, we will be judged according to the mercy we have shown others. We could win the whole world were we to take on the humility of St. Francis, regarding others as better than ourselves and preaching the Gospel with our examples. Far too few of us live this way. That is why Christianity is failing.![]()
Though it might be politically incorrect, I find it hard to assume that a Protestant or non-denomination is ‘closer’ than an active, orthodox Catholic who may or may not lack charity in his discourse.
This is a BIG issue for me because a lot of ecumenism has become nothing but indifferentism, and that is to the detriment of those not in the Church. Implying that someone can count on salvation without the Church is very popular and very wrong. I’m not saying that is what you are saying, I am just hashing out a fine point because I think your post goes close to that idea.
My next difference of opinion is in regards to rituals and their importance. Many are much more than just signs or means to an end. It is sort of like how it is impolite in many cultures to enter a home with shoes on. This is often functional because walking with dirty shoes can ruin floors and rugs; traditional Japanese flooring does not hold up well against steel toe boots! It is the same with how we treat God. Over the years ornate ways of handling Him in the Eucharist formed organically.
What traditionalists fear is that modern inventions do not keep in mind the same intense care given to God over the ages; not all Novus Ordo masses are disrespectful (my parish is excellent). However, many are. It is something like why many of us dress up for various occassions (or even work): it is simply polite and proper. Perhaps a necktie does not immediately add functionality to a desk job, but it tells a client that you respect him enough to dress up for him. So this ritual does render an efficacious result by the very nature of the ritual itself.
Finally, Christianity is not faily by any means. Protestantism is in collapse; that much is true. Within the Church, there exist many issues (heterodox preaching and belief, child abuse scandals, argument over just what it means to embrace modernism, etc.), but the Church is not failing. I see in my age block, 18-35, a spiritual renaissance that is overwelmingly conservative and traditional. Christ’s church will never fail, no matter how dark terrible things seem.
Addendum: I have loved St. Francis long before I became Catholic. I have felt a sort of kindred spirit with him much of my life. And it is for that reason that I get a little sensative when he is used for various purposes. We have to be careful that we take into account the fullness of his ministry and not take things out of context or try to apply some of his beautiful works incorrectly.