Well, if you don’t think it’s rude to ignore Father’s first two requests to go to the cry room,when they could have gone even before he had to ask, that’s your take. Many of us obviously think it was rude.How do you know they were extremely rude? It is not like they pinched the baby. It is not even like there is a protocol or rule of propriety. In our parish, for example, this would have been totally acceptable. I am all for defending the priest from the attack he is under, but not at the expense of judging someone else.
How does one judge actions without the facts? Did the priest just mention the availability of the cry room? Was the woman aware that the priest was talking to her and made this request?And as many often say here at CAF, judging actions is not the same as judging people.
I do agree with you and others who say that a priest (or anyone in any public gathering) shouldn’t call any one person or family out and humiliate them. Perhaps a general call for quiet in the nave would have been a little more appropriate and much more effective. Or perhaps the priest could have asked the congregation in general to offer assistance to those in the congregation who have rambunctious little ones.
I have to say something here though–parents have to develop a very thick skin. For the next 18 years, if they allow their children to be exposed to the real world, they will experience situations where people criticize, scream at, bully, make fun of, give bad grades to, bench, not give the job or scholarship or part or solo, etc.to their kids.
They need to get used to it. They can’t just keep quitting every church, school, sports team, restaurant, neighborhood, etc. that doesn’t treat their child like the cat’s pajamas. And we need to remember that as the U.S. continues to become more diverse, that there are cultures in which children do NOT rule.
Financial Councils are a requirement. However, they should be restricted to financial matters. Pastoral Councils are common, but not required. Where they exist, they should only serve at the pleasure of the priest and for the purpose of supporting the priest.If I become a priest, I would dissolve any “Church Council” at my Parish.
They seem to think that they decide how a priest acts and what he does.
He is the one in persona Christi and if he thinks it’s taking away from the dignity and glory of the mass, he should be able to call it out.
God willing I will someday be a priest and be the Pastor at a Parish.
Pray for me
-Joel
Then it would have been called “The Church Women’s Meeting?” Take away the name of the group will not help.If I become a priest, I would dissolve any “Church Council” at my Parish.
A parish is not required to have a parish council by any name. Nothing can stop women getting together for the purpose of gossip, but gossip is not something that can stopped by fiat any more than hypocrisy can.Then it would have been called “The Church Women’s Meeting?” Take away the name of the group will not help.
Absolutely agree with everything you have said here!The culture today is very much over sensitive, over offended, over entitled, demanding much respect without giving much and a general lack of humility and self awareness.
If I were the parents I would have been very vocal at defending the priest who embarrassed me and humbling myself for whatever error I may have unintentionally caused and defusing any gossiping etc. immediately. But that’s just me, I dont think everything is about me nor do I think I’m that important, I would be thinking of the parish as a whole.
I do agree there could have been more delicate ways to handle this, but I respect the Priests decision to do what he needed to do since the parents were not. I think this could have been avoided. I agree with OP the parents and the priest should both humble themselves, forgive each other and learn from each other. Good can always come out of bad, we should will it so.
OK. Let’s talk about this.
My husband and I raised two children, and they were the apples of our eyes. We loved them supremely and poured our hearts and souls into doing the very best job we could to raise them up to be godly women. I am happy to say that for the most part, we did it right. They have flaws, and I can see how they acquired some of those flaws from their flawed parents. But for the most part, they are healthy, happy, productive members of society who are reverent to God and generous to their fellow man.
During their childhood, we were very aware that our children were NOT the center of the very universe, and we did NOT expect everyone else to love, adore, and make allowances for them.
I am appalled to see so many parents bringing children to events and places that in the past, have been adult havens, and then expect the adults to put up with sobbing, fussing, whining, wiggling, running around, throwing things, and generally acting like perfectly normal children.
Just a few weeks ago, I attended a piano concert (performed by an adult pianist, not a child), and a couple actually brought a baby (around 10 months old) to the recital. Amazingly, the baby wasn’t quiet or still! What a shock! I’m sure this couple thought that their child would be the exception to all other silly little 10-month olds, and that their child would love every minute of the piano recital and listen quietly and sit perfectly still.
Of course that didn’t happen. The child acted like most normal 10-month old babies.
It was tense for the pianist and for the audience, and eventually, FINALLY, the young mother took the baby into the lobby. We could hear the little one sobbing and running around for the rest of the recital.
What were these parents thinking?!
This happens all the time at nice restaurants. We go out for a late night dinner and relaxing time, and someone inevitably has a baby or a toddler with them. Now maybe all of your children were different, but my children considered eating an “interruption” in their fun. They hated sitting down and actually eating something. If they could have stayed alive by never eating, they would have done so! So while they were very young, we didn’t take them to restaurants where the primary goal is to sit down and eat a meal. We waited until they were old enough to eat their food without throwing it around the room, stay seated, join in the conversation, and not have a tantrum when something didn’t go their way. We did this out of courtesy to all the other people who want to eat a meal in peace (especially if they are paying a lot for that meal!).
Now I realize that the Mass is not a “performance,” or a “restaurant,” and that children are indeed, full members of the parish and are welcome to be at Mass at all stages of their lives.
And I realize that Eucharist is the Summit of the Holy Mass, and that we do not need to have peace and quiet to receive abundant graces from the Mass.
But the rest of the Mass is important, too. There are TWO parts to the Mass, the Liturgy of the Word and the Liturgy of the Eucharist. And the Liturgy of the Word involves HEARING the Word. I don’t see that many Catholics who bring their Bibles to Mass, or who even bother to follow along in a missalette.
And as I have said several times already, for many Catholics, Mass is their ONLY catechesis throughout the entire week. Shame on them for not doing more work to get better catechized, but that’s just the way it is for many Catholics. They’re fulfilling their obligation, and good for them for doing that much.
I have no problem with babies and little ones acting their age in the Mass. But when babies and little ones are obviously in distress, crying and fussing, or screaming and trying to escape the grasp of their parents, then it’s time for the parents to recognize that others in the room are just as important as their children, and take those little ones out and help them to calm down and be happy again before bringing them back into the nave.
I agree that the priest was a little too “short” with the parents. But I’m guessing that perhaps the priest shares my viewpoint–that others in the nave are important, too, and that there are times when parents have to accept that their little one is not the center of the universe.
Your bishop might have something to say about that. Everybody is under authority and in most cases, it is the bishop who mandates the details of the advisory board, not the priest.If I become a priest, I would dissolve any “Church Council” at my Parish.
-Joel
I don’t know about your diocese, but our bishop requires that each parish have an advisory board and a finance council. The details of this are spelled out in our eparchial handbook. The priest has a bit of leeway as to who is on the board and how often they meet, and he has the only decision making authority, but the existence of the board is required.A parish is not required to have a parish council by any name. Nothing can stop women getting together for the purpose of gossip, but gossip is not something that can stopped by fiat any more than hypocrisy can.
Joel - I admire your ardor and passion. If you become a priest (and I will add my prayers for you) you will find that your opinions will most likely change during your formation years. I know of no parish in any diocese that does not run without the support of a faithful and involved layity councils (Finance, Parish, Stewardship, Service, PREP, Home & School, Liturgy, Music, etc.) You will find when you become a Pastor that these groups, when used widely, allow you to concentrate on your primary mission of being Jesus to us.If I become a priest, I would dissolve any “Church Council” at my Parish.
They seem to think that they decide how a priest acts and what he does.
He is the one in persona Christi and if he thinks it’s taking away from the dignity and glory of the mass, he should be able to call it out.
God willing I will someday be a priest and be the Pastor at a Parish.
Pray for me
-Joel
I love you Cat. If I have kids, they will not be allowed anywhere unless they can behave. The moment they don’t behave, we are gone and there will be consequences.OK. Let’s talk about this.
My husband and I raised two children, and they were the apples of our eyes. We loved them supremely and poured our hearts and souls into doing the very best job we could to raise them up to be godly women. I am happy to say that for the most part, we did it right. They have flaws, and I can see how they acquired some of those flaws from their flawed parents. But for the most part, they are healthy, happy, productive members of society who are reverent to God and generous to their fellow man.
During their childhood, we were very aware that our children were NOT the center of the very universe, and we did NOT expect everyone else to love, adore, and make allowances for them.
I am appalled to see so many parents bringing children to events and places that in the past, have been adult havens, and then expect the adults to put up with sobbing, fussing, whining, wiggling, running around, throwing things, and generally acting like perfectly normal children.
Just a few weeks ago, I attended a piano concert (performed by an adult pianist, not a child), and a couple actually brought a baby (around 10 months old) to the recital. Amazingly, the baby wasn’t quiet or still! What a shock! I’m sure this couple thought that their child would be the exception to all other silly little 10-month olds, and that their child would love every minute of the piano recital and listen quietly and sit perfectly still.
Of course that didn’t happen. The child acted like most normal 10-month old babies.
It was tense for the pianist and for the audience, and eventually, FINALLY, the young mother took the baby into the lobby. We could hear the little one sobbing and running around for the rest of the recital.
What were these parents thinking?!
This happens all the time at nice restaurants. We go out for a late night dinner and relaxing time, and someone inevitably has a baby or a toddler with them. Now maybe all of your children were different, but my children considered eating an “interruption” in their fun. They hated sitting down and actually eating something. If they could have stayed alive by never eating, they would have done so! So while they were very young, we didn’t take them to restaurants where the primary goal is to sit down and eat a meal. We waited until they were old enough to eat their food without throwing it around the room, stay seated, join in the conversation, and not have a tantrum when something didn’t go their way. We did this out of courtesy to all the other people who want to eat a meal in peace (especially if they are paying a lot for that meal!).
Now I realize that the Mass is not a “performance,” or a “restaurant,” and that children are indeed, full members of the parish and are welcome to be at Mass at all stages of their lives.
And I realize that Eucharist is the Summit of the Holy Mass, and that we do not need to have peace and quiet to receive abundant graces from the Mass.
But the rest of the Mass is important, too. There are TWO parts to the Mass, the Liturgy of the Word and the Liturgy of the Eucharist. And the Liturgy of the Word involves HEARING the Word. I don’t see that many Catholics who bring their Bibles to Mass, or who even bother to follow along in a missalette.
And as I have said several times already, for many Catholics, Mass is their ONLY catechesis throughout the entire week. Shame on them for not doing more work to get better catechized, but that’s just the way it is for many Catholics. They’re fulfilling their obligation, and good for them for doing that much.
I have no problem with babies and little ones acting their age in the Mass. But when babies and little ones are obviously in distress, crying and fussing, or screaming and trying to escape the grasp of their parents, then it’s time for the parents to recognize that others in the room are just as important as their children, and take those little ones out and help them to calm down and be happy again before bringing them back into the nave.
I agree that the priest was a little too “short” with the parents. But I’m guessing that perhaps the priest shares my viewpoint–that others in the nave are important, too, and that there are times when parents have to accept that their little one is not the center of the universe.
In our diocese, only the finance committee is mandatory. My parish has both a pastoral council and a finance committee. The pastor has complete discretion as to who sits on each. The finance committee has some duties spelled out by the diocese but other than that, the councils serve the pastor.I don’t know about your diocese, but our bishop requires that each parish have an advisory board and a finance council. The details of this are spelled out in our eparchial handbook. The priest has a bit of leeway as to who is on the board and how often they meet, and he has the only decision making authority, but the existence of the board is required.