D
Dr_Meinheimer
Guest
That WOULD explain the bombs’ utter failure.
Last edited:
So is your point that this string of bombings is part of an elaborate scheme to lay the groundwork for the impeachment of President Trump, with the cooperation and participation of the FBI, the NYPD, the ATF and the Secret Service?When I was a boy, aside from building models, and train set, and computers. I would often spend days, sometimes weeks setting up dominos in elaborate patterns just to knock them down by being the prime mover and tipping the first one. Kind of like God and the universe.
I use to have a lucrative career doing system threat assessments and make recommendations for countermeasures.
So in answer to your last question…one thing leads into another.
The democrats love to be the victims and create sympathy for themselves and what a great time to do it, right before the midterms. It is sad we have to be suspicious, but I don’t have a lot of faith in the democrats when it comes to honesty and playing fair.Inisfallen:![]()
Could it possibly be left wing liberals, done to create a climate of hatred and suspicion of Republicans before the mid term elections? Stranger things have happened.Which people? Who are you talking about? Do you have a theory about who’s behind these bombs?
They are just the dominos in the middle of the stack, doing what falling dominos do. It’s not as if with this kind of threat, they could do nothing, could they?…participation of the FBI, the NYPD, the ATF and the Secret Service
Gosh. OK, now I get it.The endgame is Dems in overwhelming power, martial law, and then the end of the republic.
That is really nauseating. Was this operation approved by JFK? To kill innocent people and children and blame someone else?Yeah a good example is Operation Northwoods where the US military planned to kill American citizens and blame it on Cuba.
No. It never happened. It was a proposal by some elements of the military to engage in false flag operations to create the appearance of justification for war with Cuba. It was rejected by Kennedy, who then fired the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who proposed the plan. I’m trying to remember his name, but I can’t at the moment.That is really nauseating. Was this operation approved by JFK? To kill innocent people and children and blame someone else?
But it was seriously proposed?AlNg:![]()
No. It never happened. It was a proposal by some elements of the military to engage in false flag operations to create the appearance of justification for war with Cuba. It was rejected by Kennedy, who then fired the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who proposed the plan. I’m trying to remember his name, but I can’t at the moment.That is really nauseating. Was this operation approved by JFK? To kill innocent people and children and blame someone else?
I’m not really knowledgeable enough about it to say one way or the other (bet you don’t hear that often at CAF!). Somebody dreamed it up, yes. It never went anywhere.But it was seriously proposed?
Unfortunately neither did Kennedy. He was assassinated the next year. Robert McNamara, a member of Kennedy’s administration, went on to be involved in the Gulf of Tonkin, a false flag that led to a terrible war for Americans and especially the Vietnamese.It never went anywhere.
This can also be attributed to Trump. I do not find it suspicious in the slightest that Democrats are pointing to his rhetoric as incredibly dangerous and divisive, because it is.Who has been filled with so much rage, hate and revenge since the 2016 election?
Kind of reminds me of that ad that Sarah Palin’s PAC had published that put certain districts under stylized cross hairs prior to Gabby Gifford being shot. This isn’t to claim that the imagery caused the shooting; that’s something that I can’t know. But I can understand why it may be believed there is a link.This can also be attributed to Trump. I do not find it suspicious in the slightest that Democrats are pointing to his rhetoric as incredibly dangerous and divisive, because it is.
They were indeed “little” speeches. As such, there is no difficulty for these people to compose such a speech in the time they had from the news becoming public. There is no reason to assume they knew about the bombs before everyone else and was in on some giant conspiracy.I find it very disappointing and a little suspicious too how Schumer, Clinton and Pelosi and other democrats had their little speeches ready blaming Trump.
Of course you have some evidence of this Democratic conspiracy to pretend to threaten violence to themselves?Who has been filled with so much rage, hate and revenge since the 2016 election? The democrats.
If Trump bears no responsibility for encouraging violence toward Democrats, would you also say that Democrats bear no responsibility for encouraging the man arrested in Suffolk County, New York, for threatening to kill supporters of Republican Rep. Lee Zeldin and President Donald Trump? Would you say Democrats bear no responsibility for encouraging any personal attacks on Republicans? After all, those attackers are just “sick people.”I will say whoever sent these packages is a sick person.
Hardly. Democrats have been saying for decades ‘Republicans want to take away your _____’. The blanks are things like ‘health care’, ‘education’, ‘housing’ etc. The Democrat position is that the government gives you things and so if the Republicans don’t want to give those things they are taking away. Taking away is a euphemism for stealing. So the Democrats have been saying for years Republicans want to steal from you. There is nothing more divisive than positioning another party as wanting to rob you.This can also be attributed to Trump. I do not find it suspicious in the slightest that Democrats are pointing to his rhetoric as incredibly dangerous and divisive, because it is.