A
AlNg
Guest
I am just observing what has been reported on this thread?You shouldn’t be saying this.
Last edited:
I am just observing what has been reported on this thread?You shouldn’t be saying this.
Is that what they are doing? I was speculating - you seem more sure.Is it fair to charge people with arrogance when they are attempting to apply their best efforts to resolving some of the difficult theological or moral problems facing the world today?
That would provide a basis in support of my speculation that they are lobbying the Pope.Perhaps the German Catholic authorities do not agree with the bloggers here and instead perhaps they believe that the teaching on artificial birth control can be changed.
That would be a guess on my part.Is that what they are doing?
The study says that homosexuality is not determined by a single “gay gene” or only a few genes. According to an article in Nature about the same study:Actually a recent study has pretty definitively determined that there is no gay gene. The study I posted looked at the full human genome and attempted to fit a regression to predict whether or not an individual was honosexual. At this point, the entire human genome has been mapped for years now, and so there is no chance that we’ll suddenly find a gay gene–there simply aren’t any more unknown genes left to study.
Nothing in this study means that genes play no part in making someone turn out gay. Rather, there are likely multiple genes of small effect that together play a part in how someone’s sexual orientation develops. It is not common for most mental characteristics to be determined by a single gene (Parkinson’s is one of the rare examples). Instead, in most cases it is likely multiple genes that are responsible, each one of which has only a small effect on its own.For their second analysis, Ganna and his colleagues wanted to see which particular SNPs were associated with same-sex sexual behaviours, and found five that were more common among those individuals. However, those five SNPs collectively explained less than 1% of the variation in sexual behaviour.
This suggests that there are a lot of genes that influence sexual behaviour, many of which researchers haven’t found yet, says Ganna. An even larger sample size could help to identify those missing variants, he says.
But Ganna cautions that these SNPs can’t be used to reliably predict sexual preferences in any individual, because no single gene has a large effect on sexual behaviours.
I am not sure that it is only the German Catholics. There is an American Catholic college that sends out a periodical keeping alumni up to date. They have a section where they congratulate couples who have just been married. But the married couples are not always man and woman. They regularly congratulate SS couples on their marriage with color photos of the newly married SS couple.Why is it always the Germans
I wonder if they believe the Church teaching marriage and same sex sexual relationships are changeable, or are they just trying to be kind?They regularly congratulate SS couples on their marriage with color photos of the newly married SS couple.
Or perhaps both?I wonder if they believe the Church teaching marriage and same sex sexual relationships are changeable, or are they just trying to be kind?
Could be … , but I doubt the former.Or perhaps both?
This is from the diocesan website, translated by Google. (Though google balked at translating the titles of the stoneworks, might be idoms) They give a little insight into the artworks, something missing from the gloriatv’s presentation.The winners of the wood sculptors are Miriam von Römer with her work “Daydreaming”, Maria von Mücke with “Little Refuge”, Luis Unnützer with “Family Circle” and Oleksii Plakhotnyi with “Ball Mill”. Among the stonemasons and stone carvers, Felix Seefried won with the work “The Castle Cross” and Georg Wiedemann with “Beautiful Prospects”. The gold and silversmith prize went to Petra Weidich for “paradise apple”. Florian Hubka received an award from the paint and varnish technician for his work “Jesus_Selfie”.
And yet homosexuality is documented in Old Testament Times, when culture, environment, and child upbringing could not be more different than they are today — when there were no “media influences,” no effete pampering of children, when even adolescence as a “life stage” wasn’t even recognized. And yet same-sex preferences still manifested themselves. Such preferences would develop in someone in a semi-nomadic largely pre-literate tribal culture because? Or just maybe, for reasons we don’t understand, such an orientation for some just isn’t a choice.Rau:![]()
No I would not concur. Homosexuality is the product of upbringing and/or environment and/or choice.If I say to you that homosexuality arises in a % of persons for no obvious reason and is not the choice of any of them - would you concur?
Nobody is born gay.
Are you suggesting it was consciously chosen in the past for these purposes and somehow became inheritable?Homosexuality probably arose as a way to obtain sexual gratification without the issues of taking a woman’s virginity which was a big deal even among pagans back then, not having to worry about fathering illegitimate children, and just good old fashioned debauchery that humans are prone to engaging in.
I’m going to go out on a limb and guess that there are other factors to a man engaging in homosexuality beyond desire to obtain sexual gratification and fear of fathering illegitimate children.Homosexuality probably arose as a way to obtain sexual gratification without the issues of taking a woman’s virginity which was a big deal even among pagans back then, not having to worry about fathering illegitimate children
Your example was men generally avoiding taking women’s virginity so obviously not prison context.When I was working guard duty in Iraq there was a prisoner