A
Annie
Guest
Well, I can’t imagine even a known pro-life nominee answering any differently, aand I don’t think any of HC’s nominees would rule in an unbiased manner on this issue.
- Status
J
JoshuaIsLord
Guest
And you think Conservative right wing bias is better?
A
Annie
Guest
Obama said it was unConstitutional!
ETA link : http://www.politifact.com/virginia/...tte-obama-said-22-times-he-lacks-power-chang/
Altho he did not say it 22 times, he did say it many times.
ETA link : http://www.politifact.com/virginia/...tte-obama-said-22-times-he-lacks-power-chang/
Altho he did not say it 22 times, he did say it many times.
Last edited:
J
JoshuaIsLord
Guest
Son, do you have the time, energy, and money to read every book someone proposes to you?
J
JoshuaIsLord
Guest
And what did a Republican lead Senate do after he signed it? Apparently Nothing.
Did they take it a Court to have it ruled upon? Apparently No.
So your point is moot.
Last edited:
J
JoshuaIsLord
Guest
And there comes in the Rub and the Row. He claimed 22 times. Yet the article could only cited 4 times that he said it.
Why is there a need to lie about 18 other occurrences? I’ve learned more often the not Democrat leaning people tend to be more honest then Republican leaning ones.
By pointing me to this article only demonstrates and reinforces that observation.
Last edited:
V
Vonsalza
Guest
They’re generally great because they’re less enthusiastic to adopt new media. It’s also why progressives are more effective at using the internet.JoshuaIsLord:
Yes. It’s called left-wing bias.
But I can see why conservative book sales are always great:
So reading the articles and treatises of other people is a bad idea?
What a frighteningly insular perspective!
(conservative books notwithstanding, right?
)
Last edited:
J
JoshuaIsLord
Guest
Gorsuch: Roe v. Wade Is the 'Law of the Land'
At Wednesday’s hearing, Democratic senators adopted a new strategy to press the Supreme Court nominee on abortion and campaign finance.
www.theatlantic.com
J
josh987654321
Guest
That’s not true, if a lie is told to someone and they mistakenly think it the truth, they can then tell that lie to someone else, but it still remains a lie.
God Bless
Thank you for reading.
J
josh987654321
Guest
That is terribly naïve. You mean likening a LGBTQIA agenda to that of the African American civil rights movement is something they couldn’t really care less about? You mean believing in a climate change ideology and overpopulation myth is not something that will drive them to push abortion and euthanasia as legitimate means of reducing population and saving money and the planet?
Extremely naïve to think abortion, euthanasia and sodomidical agenda were not on that ballot. Like I said, people can fool me but not God. I don’t think anyone is that naïve.
Obama made a huge difference in the funding, availability and expansion of abortion in his 8 year term.
And yet when they record undercover these monsters for the world to see, instead of being recognized as the heroes they are, they are slandered and taken to court while the murderers are off free.
https://barbwire.com/2017/10/13/pro-life-advancement-trump/
They also forgot to mention the Mexico City Policy in that article. And we know Mike Pence has a solid track record of pro-life as well as many people in Trumps administration, polar opposite when it comes to Clinton and the Democrats.
No, it is fallacious arguments like this that give the distorted view and deceive people.
“For the sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us and on the whole world.”
Thank you for reading.
Last edited:
J
josh987654321
Guest
It’s garbage, most of the stuff @JoshuaIsLord has been putting up here has already been debunked elsewhere on these forums, and the other stuff is just deception. Get posters off topic and confuse them so the focus is no longer on Clinton and the Democrats and how Anti-Catholic they are on the most important and fundamental Catholic teachings involving the sanctity of life.
I’m not going to waste my time especially since I’m pretty sure this poster will ignore any refutation and go onto something else anyway. Best to just pray for them I think.
God Bless You
Thank you for reading.
Last edited:
J
josh987654321
Guest
The irony
In trying to poke holes in the Trump administration’s pro-life stance, you prove your own and the Democrats, anti-Catholic, anti-life stance.
I think Gorsuch answered it very wisely. And I’ll pray for him and Trumps administration.
Last edited:
B
brian_custer
Guest
ok so we have abandoned the pro-life in favor of social progrevism; i got it 
Last edited:
J
josh987654321
Guest
And it’s not even progressive either, the championing of sodomy is regressive. So are all these other evil means Clinton and the Democrats pursue to kill off their own population, totally regressive, stupid and evil.
Claiming to be wise they became fools.
God Bless You
Thank you for reading.
A
abucs
Guest
No this is Democrats re-writing history. There is no anti-black racist party. These people you talk of who are insignificant in numbers have the choice between a Republican party who have always believed in respecting citizens rights regardless of race and a Democratic party that is now mildly anti-white in its rhetoric. Given that choice they are going to choose the Republican Party. You have been taught to put the horse before the cart and associate the Republican Party with these people. That is clearly wrong and an attempt to shift blame from the historic evil of the Democratic Party and it’s continuing use of race politics albeit now in a different guise.
Last edited:
A
abucs
Guest
Fascism is a left wing ideology. read the original Fascist manifesto written by Mussolini and Gentile in1919, two Marxists. They call for the right of the poor to vote, for women to vote, for a minimum wage, for a Progressive taxation, for Church property to be seized, for an army only for defensive means, for state nationalisation including the state taking of church property and arms companies, the state seizure of 85% of all past profits from companies selling arms, the right of workers groups to have say in industry through government and he supported gun control. This reads like a wish list from Bernie Sanders.
As I said, please actually read the Fascist manifesto before you comment. You have been lied to. Fascism is a left wing ideology and you have been emotionally conditioned into thinking Left means compassionate and therefore Fascism must be right wing. It is not.
As I said, please actually read the Fascist manifesto before you comment. You have been lied to. Fascism is a left wing ideology and you have been emotionally conditioned into thinking Left means compassionate and therefore Fascism must be right wing. It is not.
Last edited:
A
abucs
Guest
This makes no sense.
Republicans fought against the Democrats in the battle for the right for blacks to vote. They fought in the courts and in government and even on the battlefield. They still would fight for blacks to vote if anyone tried to take it away from them. That is not a 180 degree turn. It is the same principled position it has always been. You have twisted your mind to try and think otherwise.
Republicans fought against the Democrats in the battle for the right for blacks to vote. They fought in the courts and in government and even on the battlefield. They still would fight for blacks to vote if anyone tried to take it away from them. That is not a 180 degree turn. It is the same principled position it has always been. You have twisted your mind to try and think otherwise.
X
XndrK
Guest
That’s one of the more intellectually dishonest comments I’ve seen.
P
pnewton
Guest
There are many people here old enough and educated enough to know better than this
Last edited:
E
edtaylor51
Guest
Why? If someone holds nationalist - which in the parlance of our time is code for racist - views, why should they be taken seriously? The person will deny being racist, and send you down the dumbest of rabbit holes.
No thanks.
No thanks.
- Status