B
bjames1728
Guest
If you feel that this is an appropriate approach, despite any evidence to the contrary, then clearly I won’t dissuade you. I would only ask once more that you consider the full scope of your audience, the vast diversity of backgrounds of that audience, and consider the greater impact of how you communicate. While I have serious concerns with the content of your lecture, I will leave that to the theologically more capable to debate. As an aside, if you’re posts are regularly exceeding the 6000 char limit, that’s an indication that you need to consider a more terse style of writing.I did not stop quoting the article. The post exceeded the 6000 character limit. That is why I put in the link. You say “The key here is that admonishment, when and if necessary, is a personalized conversation that involves great prudence.” This is true, and If you think I am saying anything different, you are misreading the article. I am only listing the “what should be done”, I am not stating the “How it should be done”.
As for Rosebud77’s comment, many people have indicated great approval of the article. One person said it was the finest post they have seen on this forum. The basic fact still remains. People do go to hell, and if we know someone who is on that path, we are obligated to do something to try persuade them from that path. (Ezekiel 3: 16-19). How you do that is up to you. My post was mainly intended to be use as a tool, to help people explain why Cardinal Arinze’s statement is correct.