A
abcdefg
Guest
All heterosexuals in Canada should immigrate elsewhere leaving Canada a gays’ country
- Status
A
Aureole
Guest
This would not only be unwise, but we would be surrendering Canada to immorality. Canada is truly our home, to leave it would be to leave a part of ourselves behind. We cannot stand to see our great country basking in the Culture of Death so we must fight for the Culture of Life. We must stand on guard for our home!
A
Aureole
Guest
Canadian gay marriage bill: Your views
** What do you think about the legalisation of same-sex marriage in Canada? ** Canada’s parliament has approved a controversial bill legalising same-sex marriage, despite strong opposition from conservative MPs and religious groups.
The move makes Canada only the third country after the Netherlands and Belgium to allow gay marriages, although the bill still needs to be approved by the Senate to become a law.
**
If you could all take a bit of time to visit BBC and make your voice heard on this issue many would appreciate it. I think it’s about time the “sleeping giants” awoke and made their voice known! Here’s the link:
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/4633091.stm
Thanks much.
** What do you think about the legalisation of same-sex marriage in Canada? ** Canada’s parliament has approved a controversial bill legalising same-sex marriage, despite strong opposition from conservative MPs and religious groups.
The move makes Canada only the third country after the Netherlands and Belgium to allow gay marriages, although the bill still needs to be approved by the Senate to become a law.
Code:
** Do you support the bill? What do you think about the legislation now in Canada, compared to the US? Would you consider travelling to Canada to have a same-sex marriage? Send us your views.If you could all take a bit of time to visit BBC and make your voice heard on this issue many would appreciate it. I think it’s about time the “sleeping giants” awoke and made their voice known! Here’s the link:
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/4633091.stm
Thanks much.
A
abcdefg
Guest
you know homosexuals can’t procreate. it would be only a matter of time, most probably less than 50 years, they die out. then you can move back
A
Aureole
Guest
There wouldn’t be much love and charity in leaving them to die out. We must remain in our home to defend our beautiful land.
Matthew 7:6 comes to mind when thinking of leaving the country.
“Give not that which is holy to dogs; neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest perhaps they trample them under their feet, and turning upon you, they tear you.” (Douay-Rheims Version)
If we were to flee then there would be no one to guard the pearls.
A
abcdefg
Guest
They can choose to become a heterosexual and procreate but they don’t, the choice is theirs. you do them no harm by leaving the country.
A
Aureole
Guest
Apparently you’re years ahead of us Pondero!
lifesite.net/ldn/2005/jun/05062901.html
Sorry, you can ignore my earlier post.
It would do no good either, nothing will be accomplished in the long run. If we aren’t here to defend Canada then when we return it would be so deformed that we wouldn’t recognize it.
N
Neithan
Guest
sweetchuck said:
Amen to that. Shoving this legislation through is undemocratic to say the least. Two thirds of Canadians have been shown in various polls to be against this decision. Two thirds! Senate should demand a national referendum before passing this **** into law. Unfortunately in Canada, our Senate has no backbone whatsoever.
Previous to our recent Constitution (1982) I beleive the Queen could withhold ‘Royal Assent’; however, modern convention dictates that no bill which passes Senate is ever disallowed.
Horrible idea. God created this land and I will not abandon it to be defiled!
S
Shoshana
Guest
Code:
A
Aureole
Guest
I shall join you both as well. Lets get all Canadians to come together to help defend our nation!
J
JMJ_Pinoy
Guest
OMG, I didn’t even know that happened!Just hours ago, Canada legalized gay marriage. The definnition is being changed. Just saw it on the news.
I haven’t been paying *any *attention to the news lately. I’ll be praying for Canada.
A
Ani_Ibi
Guest
Wow. You sound like you really know what you are talking about. Caselaw please.
S
Sarah_Jane
Guest
I agree with Aureole.
C
contemplative
Guest
B
Brad
Guest
Those with the agenda are also anti-military action.
Those with the agenda are not interested in patriotism. They are interested in self.
P
Pondero
Guest
Ani:
"Pondero claims that Bishop Grecco (of Toronto but formerly of London) has said that clergy should be reticent to speak out against Bill C-38 because, if they do, then churches could lose their tax-free status. "
Yes, it is true, see Catholic Insight magazine, June 2005,
The Catholic community battles Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ page 41.
"Pondero claims that Bishop Grecco (of Toronto but formerly of London) has said that clergy should be reticent to speak out against Bill C-38 because, if they do, then churches could lose their tax-free status. "
Yes, it is true, see Catholic Insight magazine, June 2005,
The Catholic community battles Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ page 41.
B
Brad
Guest
The SC in the US ruled that the governmnent can take your property for whatever reason they think is good. Shouldn’t be long before the rule that it is good that a homosexual couple can take 1 of your 3 children because they cannot have any themselves.
R
Richardols
Guest
Which doesn’t explain why decorated homosexuals who want to remain in the Service are usually forced out anyway.
Just like those with the pro-lifers’ agenda aren’t interested in patriotism either, right?
A
anarchocatholic
Guest
You all sound like you’re ready to go to war over this. A lot of violence teeming below the surface of your posts. That’s pretty scary.
P
Promotor_Fidei
Guest
Ani Ibi:
canoe.ca/NewsStand/Columnists/Calgary/Bishop_Fred_Henry/2005/02/27/943782.html
Bishop Henry of Calgary is on trial now for voicing his opinion on religious matters. If Canada had freedom of religion OR speech, the case would already have been thrown out.
Also, several cases are cited at the end of the article. The anti-discrimination laws only have a partial exception for “religious officials”. The laity are fair game.
*“absent unique circumstances with respect to which the Court will not speculate, the guarantee of religious freedom in s. 2(a) of the Charter is broad enough to protect religious officials …” *
This was directed to Richard, but I ran across this article:
canoe.ca/NewsStand/Columnists/Calgary/Bishop_Fred_Henry/2005/02/27/943782.html
Bishop Henry of Calgary is on trial now for voicing his opinion on religious matters. If Canada had freedom of religion OR speech, the case would already have been thrown out.
Also, several cases are cited at the end of the article. The anti-discrimination laws only have a partial exception for “religious officials”. The laity are fair game.
*“absent unique circumstances with respect to which the Court will not speculate, the guarantee of religious freedom in s. 2(a) of the Charter is broad enough to protect religious officials …” *
- Status