Cardinal Müller to be removed from top Vatican doctrinal post

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholic_Press
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Catholic_Press

Guest
Cardinal Gerhard Müller will be removed from his post as prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) on July 2, according to multiple news reports.

Cardinal Müller was appointed by Pope Benedict XVI to head the Vatican’s doctrinal congregation, for a 5-year term that began on July 2, 2012. Pope Francis has reportedly chosen not to renew his term.

Cardinal Müller had been generally regarded as a conservative presence at the Vatican during the current pontificate, most notably when he insisted that “Amoris Laetitia must clearly be interpreted in the light of the whole doctrine of the Church.” According the Vatican insiders the German cardinal had recommended numerous changes in the controversial papal document, but his suggestions were not accepted. His influence had declined notably in recent months, giving rise to frequent rumors that he would be replaced.

Cardinal Christoph Schönborn of Vienna, who was the general editor of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, is regarded as the most likely candidate to become prefect of the CDF.

More…
 
"In February, Cardinal Müller warned bishops to stop interpreting Amoris Laetitia in ways that contradicted unchangeable Church doctrine. His comments came after bishops’ conferences such as Germany’s said it allows Holy Communion for some remarried divorcees living in what the Church has always taught is an objective state of adultery, while others such as Poland’s emphatically said it doesn’t. Individual bishops around the world have similarly been at odds over the issue. "

m.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/cardinal-mueller-to-be-dismissed#.WVa-hYV_WEc

This is an odd way to operate the universal Church.
 
Well, this isn’t good. Barring some miraculous and unforeseen appointment, I suppose we can quit pretending that the Pope has merely had his words twisted and misinterpreted these last few years and acknowledge that he clearly wants to try and change church teaching on marriage and sin. 😦
 
Well, this isn’t good. Barring some miraculous and unforeseen appointment, I suppose we can quit pretending that the Pope has merely had his words twisted and misinterpreted these last few years and acknowledge that he clearly wants to try and change church teaching on marriage and sin. 😦
Praise and thank God that the Holy Spirit won’t let that happen. The popes and bishops may have their opinions, but none will be able to become dogma if they are against Truth.
 
He has served his 5 year term and it’s up to Pope Francis.

Cardinal Christoph Schönbornis an excellent possible choice.
 
Losing Cardinal Muller at the CDF sounds like bad news to me.
I’ll echo that too JimG.
He has served his 5 year term and it’s up to Pope Francis.
Cardinal Christoph Schönbornis an excellent possible choice.
All true too Church Militant (but I still will miss Cardinal Muller being there)

God bless.

Cathoholic
 
Well, this isn’t good. Barring some miraculous and unforeseen appointment, I suppose we can quit pretending that the Pope has merely had his words twisted and misinterpreted these last few years and acknowledge that he clearly wants to try and change church teaching on marriage and sin. 😦
At least on marriage. It’s been my experience that the person who want’s to remain in the church is not the person who sought the divorce in the first place. I never understood why the church took away the sacrament of Eucharist when one needed it most.
 
Sojourner003:
I never understood why the church took away the sacrament of Eucharist when one needed it most.
For their own good (so you don’t receive Holy Communion sacrilegiously).

And also for the good of others in the parish (so as not to scandalize).

**QUOTE:

1st CORINTHIANS 11:27-30** 27 Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. 28 Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. 29 For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. 30 That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died.
 
the person who want’s to remain in the church is not the person who sought the divorce in the first place
But they CAN receive Holy Communion Sojourner003. Unless . . . .

. . . Unless they get “re-married”.

QUOTE:
**LUKE 16:18 ** 18 “Every one who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries a woman divorced from her husband commits adultery.

QUOTE:
1st CORINTHIANS 6:9-10 9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God.

Twain once said . . .

“It ain’t those parts of the Bible that I can’t understand that bother me, it is the parts that I do understand.”
 
Sojourner003:

For their own good (so you don’t receive Holy Communion sacrilegiously).

And also for the good of others in the parish (so as not to scandalize).

**QUOTE:

1st CORINTHIANS 11:27-30** 27 Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. 28 Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. 29 For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. 30 That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died.
Just remarking on my own experience, the people that really care about the Church were not the party who wanted to end the marriage. So if they are an example to the rest of the chruch, what is the message?
 
But they CAN receive Holy Communion Sojourner003. Unless . . . .

. . . Unless they get “re-married”.

QUOTE:
**LUKE 16:18 ** 18 “Every one who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries a woman divorced from her husband commits adultery.

QUOTE:
1st CORINTHIANS 6:9-10 9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God.

Twain once said . . .

“It ain’t those parts of the Bible that I can’t understand that bother me, it is the parts that I do understand.”
So I have lived long enough to see how this sometimes plays out. The person who never wanted a divorce now finds oneself divorced. As it happens, they find someone to be happy with. They find an honorable person, and happiness and an enriching life seems possible with someone else. they must give this idea up to receive the sacrament? I have known people who have done this. I don’t see the necessity of doing it.
 
So I have lived long enough to see how this sometimes plays out. The person who never wanted a divorce now finds oneself divorced. As it happens, they find someone to be happy with. They find an honorable person, and happiness and an enriching life seems possible with someone else. they must give this idea up to receive the sacrament? I have known people who have done this. I don’t see the necessity of doing it.
A man with no sin finds himself living with a bunch of sinners. He is perfectly happy by himself. He has the power to do anything he wants. But he allows himself to be betrayed, beaten, tortured, and then brutally murdered. He does this so that those very sinners who have betrayed him at every turn, and now are murdering him, can have a chance at salvation.

Crosses grow heavy sometimes. So heavy they even made God stumble.
 
Sojourner003:
Just remarking on my own experience
I am so sorry to hear that Sojourner003.

I’ll go and pray for you right now. Sounds like very painful experiences.
 
… and acknowledge that he clearly wants to try and change church teaching on marriage and sin. 😦
No, I can’t do that. I am a Catholic and such lack of charity is something I am taught to avoid.

I am not going to re-hash (at least yet) that there is some disagreement on what is doctrine and what is practice in this area. Suffice it to say that the minority opinion is that change cannot happen without changing doctrine, even though this “doctrine” has not been defined, but assumed based on a synthesis of other doctrines, a synthesis that might be faulty.
 
He has served his 5 year term and it’s up to Pope Francis.

Cardinal Christoph Schönbornis an excellent possible choice.
What is this term? I could not find it. Here is the list of the last Prefects:
JOSEPH RATZINGER (BENEDICT XVI): 25 November 1981 – 2 April 2005
WILLIAM JOSEPH LEVADA: 13 May 2005 – 2 July 2012
GERHARD LUDWIG MÜLLER: from 2 July 2012
I do think assuming this has anything to do with Amoris Laetitia is dubious. The timing is all wrong. Perhaps we need a reposting from the Catechism.
2478 To avoid rash judgment, everyone should be careful to interpret insofar as possible his neighbor’s thoughts, words, and deeds in a favorable way:.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top