F
FollowChrist34
Guest
That’s fine.You might, but the Church does not.
“All right, then, I’ll go to hell.”
~Huck Finn, Mark Twain
That’s fine.You might, but the Church does not.
Interestingly enough, Mary would have been the one in the house that killed all the animals that the Holy Family ate.I have met so many men in my life who put women on a sort of pedestal, above them, as if we are all Mary. .
Great - then I am much better off in hell. You’re headed for heaven, right?Interestingly enough, Mary would have been the one in the house that killed all the animals that the Holy Family ate.
At least until Jesus was old enough to take over.Interestingly enough, Mary would have been the one in the house that killed all the animals that the Holy Family ate.
I have the best chance of doing so if I follow what the Church teaches on ethics and morally instead of any personal opinion.Great - then I am much better off in hell. You’re headed for heaven, right?
Maybe. Lopping the heads off of chickens was generally considered to be ‘women’s work’. Christ did have a tendency to rise above sociological stereotypes, so you are probably correct, He probably killed his share of chickens and goats as well.At least until Jesus was old enough to take over.
Don’t forget that poor herd of innocent pigs that Jesus allowed to be entered by demons.At least until Jesus was old enough to take over.
I think you get to heaven by witnessing Christ. Living the commandments. I don’t sweat the small stuff. And, seriously, if we have a God that just wants the cold hearted mindless superficial obedience of a Pharisee (bloodchilling on occasion), then no, I want nothing to do with him or the Church.I have the best chance of doing so if I follow what the Church teaches on ethics and morally instead of any personal opinion.
Would you not say so as well?
We do have a God who gave us an infallible Church to guide us on matters of Faith and Morals. So I think we can agree that putting one’s own opinion on such matters above that of the Church is not a recipe for holiness. To do so is not a witness to Christ.I think you get to heaven by witnessing Christ. Living the commandments. I don’t sweat the small stuff. And, seriously, if we have a God that just wants the cold hearted mindless superficial obedience of a Pharisee (bloodchilling on occasion), then no, I want nothing to do with him or the Church.
To be honest with you, I am not all that worried about it. I don’t seriously think I am going to hell.I believe Jesus will say “I know you.”
“We are all creatures of one family.” (St. Francis of Assisi)We do have a God who gave us an infallible Church to guide us on matters of Faith and Morals. So I think we can agree that putting one’s own opinion on such matters above that of the Church is not a recipe for holiness. To do so is not a witness to Christ.
If the Church has declared that hunting is morally permissible, who are you or I to claim otherwise?
A carrot is a creature. Can it be killed and eaten? Or would that violate the teachings of St. Francis? Should we not have compassion on our brother, the carrot, and just simply let it live? Or shall we pitilessly pluck it and boil it alive?“We are all creatures of one family.” (St. Francis of Assisi)
“Those who will exclude any of God’s creatures from the shelter of compassion and pity will deal likewise with their fellow man.” (St. Francis of Assisi)
What about the lion who wants to eat his beast? How much regard does the righteous man have for him? I’m pretty sure the author of that proverb is referring to the righteous man’s domesticated animals, not other predators that want to eat them.“A righteous man has regard for the life of his beast.”
–Proverbs 12:10
Are you asking me or St. Francis?A carrot is a creature. Can it be killed and eaten? Or would that violate the teachings of St. Francis? Should we not have compassion on our brother, the carrot, and just simply let it live? Or shall we pitilessly pluck it and boil it alive?
You posted the thoughts of St. Francis, you tell me… Are we to believe that his words meant that creatures could not be killed and eaten?Are you asking me or St. Francis?
This is a long and winding thread, no? I already stated my position on this. I actually accept hunting for food as natural and normal and Mary preparing meals for the family. I don’t go in for bloodlust, i.e. hunting trophy animals or beating the family dog to death with a shovel (culling). And I don’t try and argue that the Church does either. Oh, and I eat carrots too, love 'em.You posted the thoughts of St. Francis, you tell me… Are we to believe that his words meant that creatures could not be killed and eaten?
Or did you have different intent, if so, what was that intent?
It didn’t as the skin and head of the lion were removed. In order to give the meat ‘the poor’ he would have had to admit that he had deliberately stalked a wounded animal with a huge tag around his neck for 40 hours. I am really looking forward to him surfacing to face the musicWhere you aware the Zimbabwe requires (by law) that the meat of all hunted animals be given to a governmental food bank.
That is what would have happen to Cecil.
So yes, the animal was eaten and that was known before the hunt. In fact, the knowledge would have been that the meat from this animal would be given to the poor.
So how does that factor into the CCC?
Who has admitted to ‘bloodlust’, or are you making claims without actually knowing a person’s intent.This is a long and winding thread, no? I already stated my position on this. I actually accept hunting for food as natural and normal and Mary preparing meals for the family. I don’t go in for bloodlust, i.e. hunting trophy animals or beating the family dog to death with a shovel (culling). And I don’t try and argue that the Church does either. Oh, and I eat carrots too, love 'em.
What in your view is the difference between trophy hunting and beating your dog to death with a shovel? Is one acceptable to the Church and the other not? Why?Who has admitted to ‘bloodlust’, or are you making claims without actually knowing a person’s intent.
If so, is that being a witness to Christ? To make accusations about people without proof?