It still is. That doesn’t mean people can’t use NFP…In the old days a baby was considered a blessing.
NEEEERRRRRDDDDDD.My advice would be not drink at all or drink very little, on your wedding day.
Much scandal. Reporting to your bishop. Please stand by while I peck out a six page, punctuation free diatribe.I’ll drink vicariously for any couple that doesn’t want to. I am a Vicar, after all.
In all seriousness, it’s not a bad one. At least in the US, most couples will have a brunch the following day before the wedding party and close family head back to wherever they came from. Getting through that with a hangover would be rough.To each his own…just a suggestion.
Same here. we left when all people are left or ready to left, so around 6am.We were married in Poland and they have a custom there, that the bride and groom cannot leave the reception until the very last guest leaves, and they do not “end the reception at such-and-such a time” — the reception ends when there are no more guests. The only thing I could figure out is that it must be some kind of quasi-superstitious thing, where the longer, the better-attended, the more joyous, and the more vigorously celebrated the reception is, the happier (and perhaps even more fecund) the marriage will be. Or maybe they just like to party.
urg?Is your wedding date locked in? Can you just try to get married outside your fiancés fertile window? Then you’re good to go.
That is a witty speculation, but I doubt that is the reason. I didn’t want to bring this into it, but my wife explained that some people want to “get their money’s worth” — to enjoy at least as much food and drink as they’ve paid for with their money gift. That’s not a terribly flattering observation, but I’m just relating what she told me. Like so many things in that part of the world, I don’t think anybody really knows. It’s been my experience that they just take their traditions at face value and don’t overthink the matter.Maybe the long reception is to determine if the groom is worthy. Maybe if he’s no good there’s time to remedy the situation before the marriage is consummated.
AdamP88:
HomeschoolDad:
Are you suggesting violating the teachings of the Church on sexual morality within marriage?I think he’s suggesting they break the rules of NFP on their wedding night.Yes…what’s wrong with having sex on your wedding night…I’m confused here.
Nothing whatsoever, but you have to be able to accept the fact that you might get pregnant. Actually, with NFP (and, prescinding from the moral aspect, even with contraception — it fails too!), there is always the likelihood that the wife may get pregnant.
I won’t be dogmatic about this — it’s really just common sense (as I see it) — but if a couple can’t deal with even the remote chance that they might become parents right away, they might want to reconsider whether this is the right time to marry, and postpone getting married until a time when they can entertain the idea.
No, cycles can be highly erratic! Been there, done that (my wife, not me). We had a few times when her cycle was late and we said to ourselves “well, maybe this is the time”. It wasn’t, but it could have been.My bad. I thought most women had fairly predictable cycles, at least within a few days here or there. Clearly I’m off target on this one.
same experience here!No, cycles can be highly erratic! Been there, done that (my wife, not me). We had a few times when her cycle was late and we said to ourselves “well, maybe this is the time”. It wasn’t, but it could have been.
That probably happened too. But without taking a pregnancy test, there would be no way to know. We chose not to test.HomeschoolDad:
same experience here!No, cycles can be highly erratic! Been there, done that (my wife, not me). We had a few times when her cycle was late and we said to ourselves “well, maybe this is the time”. It wasn’t, but it could have been.
But maybe for some cycles we are late because of an early miscarriage that the woman is not aware of?
The Church’s teachings on sexual morality within marriage are not man-made laws. They are divinely inspired. In their essence, they cannot change. Wrong cannot ever become right.These ideas are where I have problems. Pharisees come to mind. Too many laws made by man to control every single aspect of a person’s being. It is the couple’s choice on what to do on their wedding night.
Same here! I don’t want to test before being sure I am pregnant! To not be deceived, or panicked!That probably happened too. But without taking a pregnancy test, there would be no way to know. We chose not to test.
I agree completly with you. i don’t like the division between “planned” pregnancies and unplanned one. It is artificial and a distorced way of seeing life, what is a surprise and cut between people who are desire and thoses who are not.Catholics shouldn’t speak of “oops babies”, in fact, if a couple chooses to disclose the fact — it’s only other people’s business if you make it their business
I think this might be my favourite sentence I’ve ever read on the internet.Sorry, you must be interpreting what I said all wrong .