Chaperones lead Catholic schoolgirls out from "Nutcracker Suite" performance with same-sex roles, causing criticism, agreement

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdgspencer
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry, just trying to lay some groundwork to see how receptive you might be. Two questions are two too many.

If we can agree that lying is bad when trying to deceive and that the body can communicate through its actions, this is my argument to this claim:
Barnesy said:
as long as it harms noone i have no interest in what people do in private
Click to expand...
Through the sexual act, you are in fact lying to the other participant if you are not:
(1) in a permanent/binding relationship
(2) open to reproduction

In the sexual act you are communicating to the other that you are giving yourself completely to them and will accept any natural consequences that may come from it. If you thwart either the unitive or procreative aspects of sex you are in effect lying to the other with your body. This is harmful and bad.
 
DaddyGirl2 said:
As for me, I see nothing wrong with same-sex couples…and applaud their commitment to each other by getting married.
Click to expand...
Which explains why you argue that it’s perfectly fine to encourage Catholic kids to adopt a false and sacrilegious understanding of marriage.
 
Last edited:
humbleseeker said:
Sorry, just trying to lay some groundwork to see how receptive you might be. Two questions are two too many.

If we can agree that lying is bad when trying to deceive and that the body can communicate through its actions, this is my argument to this claim:
40.png
Barnesy:
as long as it harms noone i have no interest in what people do in private
Click to expand...
Through the sexual act, you are in fact lying to the other participant if you are not:
(1) in a permanent/binding relationship
(2) open to reproduction

In the sexual act you are communicating to the other that you are giving yourself completely to them and will accept any natural consequences that may come from it. If you thwart either the unitive or procreative aspects of sex you are in effect lying to the other with your body. This is harmful and bad.
Click to expand...
Im sorry i cant see any harm in having sex if you both agree that its not a permanent relationship. How can you lie to some one if you are both open and honest?? And hardly any one has sex just to get pregnant. They all do it because it feels good. Being open to reproduction is only if you think that sex is only for reproduction. Its a religious requirement. In any case if its two women or two men they obviously cant be open to reproduction. And people havent been saying that you need to be in a permanent relationship. They say you must be married and those two things are not the same. I know some unmarried people who have been together longer than married ones.
 
Barnesy said:
You have to tell children what is good for them and what is bad for them. You can tell children that some thing is wrong and then give them reasons. Remember we did this before? Isnt that ok with you?
Click to expand...
And if they don’t accept your reasons?
 
Elf01 said:
40.png
Barnesy:
You have to tell children what is good for them and what is bad for them. You can tell children that some thing is wrong and then give them reasons. Remember we did this before? Isnt that ok with you?
Click to expand...
And if they don’t accept your reasons?
Click to expand...
Then your reasons may be wrong. But If your reasons are right then theyre going to end up learning the hard way.
 
Those chaperones deserve recognition of some kind, if not from their diocese, then from the Vatican. May they be rewarded for taking a stance against the moral depravity which has invaded the arts.
 
Yes. I know of a parish school that had a “tradition” of sorts of attending a big Shakespeare festival. They stopped when it became apparent that the programming was increasingly pushing the gay/trans agenda. The kids and parents got over it.
 
vz71 said:
Doesn’t matter if they are religious or not, they still have a soul that is harmed and they still have to stand judgement.

Disbelief is not a get out of jail free card.
Click to expand...
If they don’t believe in that then it is not going to influence their actions.
 
flamingpuppet said:
Yes. I know of a parish school that had a “tradition” of sorts of attending a big Shakespeare festival. They stopped when it became apparent that the programming was increasingly pushing the gay/trans agenda. The kids and parents got over it.
Click to expand...
Good for that parish… Who needs peddlers of trash…
 
vz71 said:
And what do you suppose is the effect of not telling children what to believe?
Click to expand...
They’ll never hear of Jesus - Messiah of All
.
. and they could thus easily fall into to mitts of those peddling evil
 
It doesn’t have to work…
VanitasVanitatum said:
Yes it does.
Click to expand...
How about this view on ‘has to work’ … vs ''never had to work"

Jesus’ “Mission” was/is to Testify to the Truth…

The percentages who accepted His perfect Testimony?

Never 100%
 
Barensy has already shown that he isn’t going to change so there is no point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top