I’m not exactly sure what difference it makes what my stance is.
It makes a big difference to me. Because this issue has different approaches and stances with various Catholics. Some think it’s fine to marry outside the Church. Some just dont care. Some dont think it’s fine, but support other’s decisions. Some think it’s not good, but would attend without saying anything to the couple. Some think it’s not good, but would attend only after saying something to the couple. Some think it’s not good, and would not attend, but remain their friend. Some think it’s not good and would not attend or remain a friend.
I don’t think that whether or not I support a decision to marry outside the Church is as black and white as you want it to be.
I think the law which forbids marriage outside the Church is quite black and white. If an abusive priest refuses a marriage, Catholics should have enough brotherly support to bring the matter to the Bishop.
It saddens me when people who are Catholic marry outside the Church. But the thing is we all have free will. No one can force someone to accept the Church and her teachings. If someone who was raised Catholic decides they don’t want to be Catholic, then they don’t continue to follow what the Church says.
The Tribunal doesnt care. They will still dismiss the wedding as invalid in the Church, and allow either party to abandon the relationship. This happens quite a bit, you know?
I don’t “approve” of that decision, but even God doesn’t force Himself on people. You are of the opinion that attending the wedding = supporting a decision to marry outside the Church and it’s not that simple. I believe one can kindly make it known that they are sad the person isn’t marrying in the Church and why that’s not a good decision, say they wish they were marrying in the Church and hope they will one day, while still attending the wedding. When they are there at the wedding, they can pray for the people getting invalidly married that they eventually return to the Church.
That’s a good compromise, if one chooses to attend. I happen to highly doubt that is what happens in the great majority of Catholics who attend such a wedding. I think there is very little to no resistance.
Like @CilladeRoma ‘s story. Not attending the wedding can drive someone further away from the Church.
That priest was abusive. What should have happened, is another priest’s opinion sought, or writing the Bishop.
Throughout this thread, you maintain the opinion that not attending the wedding is the one-and-only way to protest the invalidly of the marriage. I’m just wondering what happens after the invalid wedding.
Not exactly. I do think there can be an acceptable way to attend. I posted an article from canon law made easy, which described it well. However, I happen to think that is hardly ever a realistic approach. And I dont understand why the couple would prefer anyone attending in that way but would rather they didnt attend at all.