T
tabycat
Guest
Maybe to many runins with the likes of the KKK and RHD?I didn’t say you haven’t. Why is everyone so defensive?![]()

Maybe to many runins with the likes of the KKK and RHD?I didn’t say you haven’t. Why is everyone so defensive?![]()
It doesn’t say a well regulated right to bear arms, so that’s irrelevant.Your Constitution says well regulated militia. Gun control can exist and it works. That’s a proven fact
Lower gun crime in some other countries may not be due not that there is more gun control but that there is better enforcement from the police, people intelligence, and increased conviction ratesMaybe not banned, but there should be serious gun control. Look at gun control in every developed nation and they all have less gun homicides
Source: Stats Canada
statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2008002/article/10518-eng.htm
In reality, nothing will be done. Nothing was done after Virginia Tech, the Tuscan shooting, the Sikh Temple shooting, or the Aurora shooting.
In 2004, the National Academy of Sciences reviewed 253 journal articles, 99 books and 43 government publications evaluating 80 gun-control measures. Researchers could not identify a single regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents. A year earlier, the Centers for Disease Control reported on ammunition bans, restrictions on acquisition, waiting periods, registration, licensing, child access prevention and zero tolerance laws. CDC’s conclusion: There was no conclusive evidence that the laws reduced gun violence
Thats right I forgot about all those guns the terrorists used on 9/11…wait a minute…?No but they do have gun controls at airports, they even stepped that up since 9/11 and not too many complained about that.
Would you prefer bombings instead?Then there will just be more shootings. The gun culture has brought more violence, not safety. Where’s the massive shootings in Australia, or England, or Canada? Nothing like what has transpired in the United States happens in these countries. Look at the source I provided
I didn’t say anything about crime, I’m referring to gun violence, which is massive in the United States compared to other developed countriesFalse. More people own guns than ever before and the overall crime rate has gone down.
Not a libertarian, usually vote Republican, but at the local level usually vote Constitution Party. I did not agree with the Republicans on the Patriot Act but since I worked for the Senate at the time, could not voice my opinion to my senators and representatives. But way to go on assuming there. Life will never be perfect because man is fallen. Our faith teaches us that. However, history teaches us that many, many, many atrocities happen under governments that take away freedoms from their citizens.why cant you libertarians make a distinction between corrupt government and good government? government restrictions are not bad in themselves, they are only bad depending what is being restricted. remember, it was the republicans who introduced the patriot act.
true freedom is impossible. our faiith is submission to God, so you should kiss the idea of 'freedom" goodbye. true freedom is not even desirable, its much better to live in a morally responsible society than an anarcho-libertarian mad max style society.
Who approved Fast and Furious?Bush didn’t end anything. Fast and Furious was a continuation of gun walking operations under Project Gunrunner that began under the Bush Administration and was put to an end under the Obama Administration.
![]()
Agreed. The few times it’s happened they don’t allow the National Guard to go fully armed.I don’t have any objections to using the Patriot Act to send the National Guard into the inner cities of this country to put an end to gang related drug and gun trafficking. They’re domestic terrorists and should be treated as such.![]()
The democrats disagree with you. Believing in the right to life will actually get you listed as a potential terrorist by the Obama Department of Homeland Security.I didn’t make that leap. I agreed that the right to life trumps the right to shoot beer cans.![]()
Right, because gun control laws stopped that terrorist attack in Norway a year and a half ago that killed more than 100 people…Guns aren’t the problem but lax gun control laws are. Allowing any yahoo who happens to walk in the door to buy a gun is insane.
that is pretty scary. but it would still save a lot of lives. it would at least reduce the amount of homocides and gang violence. lol imagine the bloods and the crips having to go through all the trouble of making homemade weapons like that. do not tell that that would at least not HINDER crime. and let me ask you this, guns are legal now, yet how did it help those children this morning?BTW…if you actually are able to, somehow, get rid of the weapons in the country…I give you exhibit A
youtube.com/watch?v=mHAO8oxwioU
All you need is scrap metal, a hacksaw, drill with a drill press and a file.
Two weeks and about $50 to make.
Scary? You betcha. But this is a guy showing this off based on a British guy who developed this design and weapons are banned completely there
False, Abyssinia. The stronger the control, the less the gun violence in developed nations. It’s a factLower gun crime in some other countries may not be due not that there is more gun control but that there is better enforcement from the police, people intelligence, and increased conviction rates
No evidence gun control works in America
articles.cnn.com/2011-01-18/opinion/levy.anti.gun.control_1_gun-control-gun-regulations-gun-related-crimes?_s=PM:OPINION
How many other developed countries have Mexico on their border?I didn’t say anything about crime, I’m referring to gun violence, which is massive in the United States compared to other developed countries
Source of this fact?False, Abyssinia. The stronger the control, the less the gun violence in developed nations. It’s a fact
How did all the pointless gun control policies in NJ and CT (the strictest in the nation) help them?that is pretty scary. but it would still save a lot of lives. it would at least reduce the amount of homocides and gang violence. lol imagine the bloods and the crips having to go through all the trouble of making homemade weapons like that. do not tell that that would at least not HINDER crime. and let me ask you this, guns are legal now, yet how did it help those children this morning?
There were 300 gun control laws as of 1999. If gun control laws worked, there would be evidence that they worked but there is noneI didn’t say anything about crime, I’m referring to gun violence, which is massive in the United States compared to other developed countries
You didn’t adress how we get 80 million people to surrender their arms, to a police force nationally only numbering 700,000 and a military numbering 2 million. We couldn’t even disarm Baghdad and had to resort to letting every Iraqi household only having 1 fully auto matic AK-47, not the look alike semi auto ak-47s we have in this countryIt doesn’t say a well regulated right to bear arms, so that’s irrelevant.
statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2008002/article/10518-eng.htmSource of this fact?
Actually imagine the money that will be made on the black market with a few guys in a garage that could make 20 + a day and sell them for 400 +that is pretty scary. but it would still save a lot of lives. it would at least reduce the amount of homocides and gang violence. lol imagine the bloods and the crips having to go through all the trouble of making homemade weapons like that. do not tell that that would at least not HINDER crime. and let me ask you this, guns are legal now, yet how did it help those children this morning?
Operation Wide Receiver ended in 2007, after they found the guns couldn’t be tracked well enough. Also, the 450 guns in Wide Reciever were (at least attempted to be) tracked, while the 2,020 guns involved in F+F weren’t even attempted.Bush didn’t end anything. Fast and Furious was a continuation of gun walking operations under Project Gunrunner that began under the Bush Administration and was put to an end under the Obama Administration.
Oh, well why didn’t you say so?I didn’t make that leap. I agreed that the right to life trumps the right to shoot beer cans.![]()
Doesn’t appear on that link.