Q
QContinuum
Guest
Sorry, if I don’t trust your psychological diagnosis. Like the rest of your claims, it appears to be based upon speculation and not any supporting evidence.Atheism is a psychological condition, not
Sorry, if I don’t trust your psychological diagnosis. Like the rest of your claims, it appears to be based upon speculation and not any supporting evidence.Atheism is a psychological condition, not
No, because without vaccines, the children die so women have more children.They would actually buy more products if they had more children.
More children to vaccinate, more children to keep healthy.
Again this is a different thread. As for God’s existence study the rational proofs put forth by Aquinas. Also. You and the cosmos didn’t simply pop into existence accidentally. But again, different thread.Sorry, if I don’t trust your psychological diagnosis.
You missed the point. It’s that the Church arguing for or against one particular thing doesn’t equate to it actively desiring a secondary side effect. Just as the CDC and other agencies promoting vaccines doesn’t mean they are all trying to make women “feel comfortable with fewer children.” Whatever that means.Not so. First, there is an alternative to contraception to limit the number of children. Second, one would have to prove that the Church wants more women to die.
Because the CDC aims to reduce deaths does not mean it us doing so to “make women feel comfortable with fewer children.”
Sorry, but the original discussion revolved around the CDC and other groups responsible for producing vaccines.No, the CDC has nothing to do with the issue. It is those like Bill and Melinda Gates who are pushing what @Gab123 is talking about.
Vaccines have been wonderful for human beings for many generations. The problem is the current state of big pharma, vaccine injuries, coverups and corruption at the cdc.is this what Catholics believe about vaccines?
This is not the teaching of the Church. Not is it the expected belief for Catholics.Also, I have to ask: is this what Catholics believe about vaccines?
Then that’s a deflection. You were the one who made a statement about the psychology of atheists, a baseless assertion, then threw out an off-topic charge and a chirp about Aquinas.Again this is a different thread. As for God’s existence study the rational proofs put forth by Aquinas. Also. You and the cosmos didn’t simply pop into existence accidentally. But again, different thread.
Yes, I know but there’s a lot of stuff all mixed in to her argument. I just unraveled a small amount for my comment.Sorry, but the original discussion revolved around the CDC and other groups responsible for producing vaccines.
This is absolutely not what Catholics believe. But there is a small number of people who believe this stuff, and so inevitably, a few who believe this will be Catholic, some Methodist, and so on.Also, I have to ask: is this what Catholics believe about vaccines? That it’s… what, more preferable for greater numbers of children to die of preventable diseases because vaccines might reduce the number of babies born?
I was simply responding to you repeatedly claiming that faith had no rational source. As for atheism I recommend the book The Psychology if Atheism by Dr Paul VitzThen that’s a deflection. You were the one who made a statement about the psychology of atheists, a baseless assertion, then threw out an off-topic charge and a chirp about Aquinas.
That governments lie to people and corruption exists in places of power is common through history. As for the existence of God, and the purpose of your existence, there’s plenty of proof for that. But that’s another thread.I do hope any readers will note the inherent dishonesty of such tactics when considering the supposed nobility of the religious position.
My statement was regarding the conflict between evidence-based reason and irrational faith. Your statement was about supposed the universal psychological condition of all atheist individuals. A pejorative if there ever was one.I was simply responding to you repeatedly claiming that faith had no rational source. As for atheism I recommend the book The Psychology if Atheism by Dr Paul Vitz
simply read the thread. You kept inserting faith and religion in a discussion about corruption in big pharma and their relation to the cdc. This thread is about the corona virus. You’re the one bringing up faith and religion. As for atheists, their arguments boil down to emotional attacks against religion, not intellectual arguments against the existence of God. But that’s another thread please.My statement was regarding the conflict between evidence-based reason and irrational faith.
Again, I never said the CDC is out to kill old people. Please stop calumniating me. And to interject that “faith leads to irrational beliefs” is a gratuitous jab at religion, apparently from a psychological need to confirm one’s atheism.No. You brought it up first and repeatedly with references to Satan, a religious figure. That and your illogical argument regarding the CDC’s intentions are what sparked my observation that faith leads to irrational beliefs.
Do you have a source for that?In the U.S. alone, secret sterilizations of tens of thousands of Americans occurred in the 1970s and 80s,
Actually, you did imply in multiple posts, which specifically named the CDC, along with other “powers” as desiring “senilcide.” Or, killing old people.Again, I never said the CDC is out to kill old people. Please stop calumniating me.
Oh look, you said it again. Those agencies “pushing for massive new vaccines” are planning to off the seniors.Again, the same powers who are screaming for population reduction, abortion and euthanasia, are the same powers that are pushing for massive new vaccines, thus it is not hard to imagine these same powers devising a plan to commit Senicide on the global population to “save” the planet.
With corona virus on the move…i have been watching internet mass. I hear different visions of it …but everytine i am sitting in church people are sneezing and coughing continuously and just not feel the sane way and makes me very uncomfortable…Strickly has been said and professionally said We should avoid large crowds so sounds like i would stay home…any views?