S
st_felicity
Guest
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1327/f13273672a396a4faca25365bedb73257fea4657" alt="40.png"
Now…your profile says you ARE Catholic…is this another falsehood?To suggest that I worship the Lord as a creature is ignorant to say the least and speaks volumes of how Catholics view other christians
Now…your profile says you ARE Catholic…is this another falsehood?To suggest that I worship the Lord as a creature is ignorant to say the least and speaks volumes of how Catholics view other christians
Firstly, what do you mean by another falsehood? And secondly, I am Catholic in the sense that I was Baptised, Made Confession and First Holy Communion and was Confirmed in the Catholic Church. I have been told by priests, bishops and many Catholics that this means I am Catholic and although I currently do not attend Mass this does not mean I am not Catholic, but that I have not fulfilled all my duties. Now if you know something they don’t, feel free to share it with me and I will change my profile to reflect what “Saint Felicity” thinks is appropriate.Now…your profile says you ARE Catholic…is this another falsehood?
I have been told by Catholics themselves that they worship Mary, especially when I was in Lourdes and I wished to discuss the point as that was what the thread is about. Start a new thread asking: does Teresa worship the Lord sufficiently? and that will be the issue up for discussion. Until then, the debate is still about whether Catholics commit idolatry in bowing before images, especially of Mary and I fail to see how my weakness as a human in relation to God has relevance to this.I find your indignation quite uncompelling, Teresa. Aren’t you doing the same thing by claiming Catholics worship Mary, posting pictures as “proof” of your point, all the while admitting you are a fallen Catholic who hasn’t been an active member of the Church for some time?
Again, you are saying we make Mary an equal to God (maybe some people do, and those people are in the wrong, but your average pious Catholic does not). How do you know who is making Mary equal to God? You say people have told you they do. Well, then you are right to criticize those people. Most of us that pray before a statue do not worship that person, never mind worship them as an equal to God (unless it is a statue of Jesus, then we are worshipping Him as an equal to God—but not the statue remember).No I don’t see your point. The worship given to Mary is attested to by many (see some of my other posts) and it doesn’t compare to the praise I give to the Lord. But how I worship is still not the issue. The issue is idolatry. I didn’t say you worship Mary in place of God, I said she is worshipped as an equal to God (which by many she is). IMO the honour given to Mary is not nearly enough if she is truly deserving of the praise many attribute to her in the same way as the praise offered to Gos is lacking.
That is not a criticism, we are human and unable to give God the glory He deserves. But unlike what you are infering of yourself, I haven’t claimed to give ‘sufficient’ attention to the Lord. How I worship is between myself and the Lord and he knows my sincerity and the depths of my praise. To suggest that I worship the Lord as a creature is ignorant to say the least and speaks volumes of how Catholics view other christians
Yes I do see you point. However, I was pointing out Biblical research about idolatry in the context of this thread. You presumed that I (specifically me) worship God in a particular way of which there is no evidence, whereas I said that Catholics (a general term to mean an unspecific group of people) may be commiting idolatry by praying in a way which the said Bible study provides evidence towards. Together with the fact that some “Catholics” (although in this context the word should be used loosely) admit to praising Mary higher than God I backed up my claims with evidence.See, it doesn’t feel too hot to have people tell you that you don’t worship God how you should. Obviously no one can worship Him completely as we should (a good point by you), but we can all do our very best to strive for worshipping as we should. Likewise, accusing us of idolatry is the same as accusing you of only venerating God. Neither one is appropriate. Now do you see my point?
Well, sometimes its easier to see the other person’s side of the debate and why they might react as they do if you are put in their position. I sincerely apologize for any uncharitableness. I of course do not know how you worship God just as you cannot KNOW how others worship. We cannot read each others’ hearts. Only God can do that.Yes I do see you point. However, I was pointing out Biblical research about idolatry in the context of this thread. You presumed that I (specifically me) worship God in a particular way of which there is no evidence, whereas I said that Catholics (a general term to mean an unspecific group of people) may be commiting idolatry by praying in a way which the said Bible study provides evidence towards. Together with the fact that some “Catholics” (although in this context the word should be used loosely) admit to praising Mary higher than God I backed up my claims with evidence.
It was not me who accused you of idolatry, it was someone else on behalf of whom this thread was started. I added research on the topic of idolatry in relation to a Bible study to get people’s thoughts on this study and to contribute to the debate. I was hoping to learn but I have had people mock my argument by saying they cannot do their laundry or dusting, knowing full well that the points they argued weren’t what was meant.
The thing I find disrespectful is that this thread was started to get people’s opinions about Catholics and idolatry, to give Catholics a chance to defend themselves and for people to point out** why** they think its idolatry (instead of the, it’s Catholic so it’s wrong view). I gave a Scriptural study and a picture sent to me as evidence why Catholics may be commiting idolatry and Marian excesses (in England this is a legitimate concern within the Church, as Mary being seen on pieces of toast and the like is ridiculing the faith). In return all I have received is ridiculous comments or attacks on how I worship which I don’t feel are conducive to the debate.
So when you make comments like this, you make it personal. Based soley on your interpretation of a couple verses of the Bible you claim to know what’s in someone’s heart. That’s not right.We don’t have to assume that they are worshipping. According to the Word of God, when we see someone do this, we KNOW that they are worshipping.
You are right, it’s not right. I never really saw it that way before and I am sorry if it comes across like that. I never meant to personally offend anyone, just to contribute some research to the debate. I felt like I was being attacked and couldn’t understand why as I was viewing what I wrote as impersonal and for that I truly apologise. Incidentally, it is not my interpretation of a few verses but a study I was involved with, so the conclusions and wording are not mine personally but what we discovered collectively from the study.So when you make comments like this, you make it personal. Based soley on your interpretation of a couple verses of the Bible you claim to know what’s in someone’s heart. That’s not right.
This is inflammatory and does not address the concern raised by mtr01 and reiterated by st-felicity, particularly in light of a statement you made in a previous post, to wit:Now if you know something they don’t, feel free to share it with me and I will change my profile to reflect what “Saint Felicity” thinks is appropriate.
In all good faith, I have no problem (personally) accepting that you are Catholic. Moreover, I feel that Catholics have a right to question the teaching of their Church with a view to understanding it (as opposed to looking for ways to undermine it). However, once a person claiming to be Catholic publishes views which contradict teachings of the Church, then challenging that person is legitimate and this is the reason why:I doubt I will return to Catholicism again, there is too much that has gone on and there are several teachings I never see myself accepting/agreeing with.
I agree that what I said may be construed as inflammatory but in conceding that you must concede that she said:This is inflammatory and does not address the concern raised by mtr01 and reiterated by st-felicity, particularly in light of a statement you made in a previous post
I have yet to have explained to me what falsehoods (a fancy way of calling me a liar) I have made. I have explained my position several times and so see nothing wrong with calling myself a Catholic and gather that you largely agree. In view of Catholic teaching, I think I have made it obvious that there is Church teaching I do not agree with. For someone to come here and think that what I say is what the Church teaches would be naive and ignorant to say the least.Now…your profile says you ARE Catholic…is this another falsehood?
So Xavier agrees that The Ever Virgin Mary is The Mother of God. It’s so good to see that he finally gets it! The rest is simple. Venerate the Mother God.I worship Jesus because He is God.
The intercession of saints, though a sort of parrallel issue to this one (in some folk’s eyes anyway), is not really what this thread is meant to discuss. This is about the false iconclastic allegation that Catholics actually are idolators because of their images and statues.Howdy, people! I haven’t seen anyone mention intercessory prayers yet. My limited understanding of intercessory prayers means this: we ask Mary and the saints for intercession, which is praying to God on our behalf. We ask friends and family here on earth who haven’t died yet to pray for us, and we’re doing something comparable with those whom we can be confident that they’re in Heaven, worshipping God full-time for eternity. I hope someone can back me up, because I could’ve been clearer. God bless you all…happy Fish-day!![]()
But?I agree that what I said may be construed as inflammatory but in conceding that you must concede that she said
Again inflammatory. Suggesting that you have posted falsehoods and calling you a liar are two entirely different things, both in reason and in law. I am not aware of any posts calling you a liar. Moreover, if I were aware, do not doubt that I would report it to the mods.I have yet to have explained to me what falsehoods (a fancy way of calling me a liar) I have made.
Let me specify.I have explained my position several times and so see nothing wrong with calling myself a Catholic and gather that you largely agree.
That’s an unwarranted attribution. We cannot say with any certainty how much preparation visitors bring to this board. For all we know, children may be lurking on their parent’s computer. People (regardless of their age or preparation) who are quite vulnerable may be lurking here. There’s is nothing untoward with you having issues with the Catholic Church. Let us also keep in mind those who come here in desparate straights who want and need the straight goods on Catholicism.For someone to come here and think that what I say is what the Church teaches would be naive and ignorant to say the least.
Point taken.I still do not know what “falsehoods” I have been accused of and so although I answered felicity with sarcasm she possibly doesn’t deserve.
I did not defend her. I supported what she was saying. There is a difference between a person and what that person says. As for any instincts I may have: there is no profit in attempting to judge invisible aspects of my being. What I say is sufficient for discussion.its odd you instinctively defend her
Perhaps st_felicity will be kind enough to specify.What are these other falsehoods?
What are these other falsehoods?Quote:
Originally Posted by teresas1979
Perhaps st_felicity will be kind enough to specify.