S
saintjohnxxiii
Guest
news-journalonline.com/article/20140718/NEWS/140719489/1040?p=2&tc=pg
Is anyone surprised that there won’t be charges?
Is anyone surprised that there won’t be charges?
Praying for the well being of this child.news-journalonline.com/article/20140718/NEWS/140719489/1040?p=2&tc=pg
Is anyone surprised that there won’t be charges?
Will there be charges if the man is found to be not guilty of raping his son in a court of law? And what then if there is no evidence gathered now?news-journalonline.com/article/20140718/NEWS/140719489/1040?p=2&tc=pg
Is anyone surprised that there won’t be charges?
I suspect it would be highly unlikely for the perv not to be found not guilty. If the police were worth their salt, they would have collected DNA evidence from the boy and that pretty much seals the case.Will there be charges if the man is found to be not guilty of raping his son in a court of law? And what then if there is no evidence gathered now?
"According to Frolander’s arrest affidavit, police say when they questioned him he admitted sexually battering the child and said, “I’m guilty.” "Will there be charges if the man is found to be not guilty of raping his son in a court of law? And what then if there is no evidence gathered now?
Ok, I missed that bit. But if that confession wasn’t there, would it still be OK?"According to Frolander’s arrest affidavit, police say when they questioned him he admitted sexually battering the child and said, “I’m guilty.” "
He’s admitted to it. You’d hope it will be an open and shut case.
What happens if you have lawyers who twist the facts and have the guilty party plead not guilty and blames the victim for the attack? I read that there was a case where Hillary Clinton defended a rapist who had attacked a 12 year old girl by claiming that it was the child’s fault that she was raped. Why do parents have to go through this type of hell that lawyers such as Hillary Clinton force upon innocent people who have been victimized by criminal rapists? Why is that fair to the child who has been raped and scarred for life and to the parents of the child who are being dragged through hell by these lawyers who will stop at nothing to get their client off the hook?I think not. Justice is for the courts.
Vigilante justice is a very serious serious crime. That is why it is so good that the father only did the bare minimum to restrain the perp and then called the police. Until you find yourself in a similar situation there is no way that you can realize the amount of restraint that the father showed.Ok, I missed that bit. But if that confession wasn’t there, would it still be OK?
I think not. Justice is for the courts. Vigilante justice is not good unless there are no courts. Self defense or defense of another person is valid but that stops once the perp is restrained. Arguably emotions can be difficult to control but that can only be a mitigating factor.
I am sure I would probably have killed him. I remember a case in California where a father all but killed a guy who broke into his daughters room and was assaulting her. He used a cast-iron skillet. One good reason to keep a skillet like that on hand.I’m surprised the rapist is still alive. I don’t know if I’d have that much restraint.