C
caroljm36
Guest
I agree. I support the death penalty for cut-and-dried cases like Charlie Manson, Jeffery Daumer et al but not when it’s a circumstantial evidence case. Granted, it’s good evidence, enough to convict, but I would back away from the ultimate penalty.I am generally against the death penalty, but this case I am definetly against it. The evidence was all very circumstantial. I concede that it looks bad for Peterson, but it is still circumstantial.
I wish I was certain he would suffer in life for this, but unfortunately some people have an amazing capability to deny or rationalize just about anything. Or at least up until the last moments.