A
Aquinas62
Guest
my apologies…Wasn’t addressing you.
my apologies…Wasn’t addressing you.
my apologies…
Talk about fantasy, you really think this was a peaceful mission? and I am sure that Hamas has always been above board? Do you think that if Israel agreed to every one of the demands placed upon it, that Hamas would then live in peace with Israel? NOW THAT IS A FANTASY!! I dont think so… Their own charter demands the eradication of Israel.Why is it that in order to try and justify Israel’s policies people need to invent fantasties out of thin air? Even Israel is not claiming the ships were trying to deliver weapons.
Well at least I actually provide evidence before making claims, whereas you seem happy to just make stuff up. There’s no evidence that those ships were trying to deliver weapons or anything but humanitarian aid, and Israel itself accepts this. So will you please withdraw your claims.Talk about fantasy, you really think this was a peaceful mission? and I am sure that Hamas has always been above board? Do you think that if Israel agreed to every one of the demands placed upon it, that Hamas would then live in peace with Israel? NOW THAT IS A FANTASY!! I dont think so… Their own charter demands the eradication of Israel.
It was not solely going there to provide humanitarian aid. It was a protest to undermine the blockade, and that was know before hand.Well at least I actually provide evidence before making claims, whereas you seem happy to just make stuff up. There’s no evidence that those ships were trying to deliver weapons or anything but humanitarian aid, and Israel itself accepts this. So will you please withdraw your claims.
It should be noted that neocons in both Britain and the USA are divided on this issue. Even pro Israel commentators like Oliver Kamm are condemning Israel. What has interested me most about this case is that even a lot of pro-Israel people are coming out condemning them. Interesting. Sad, but interesting.The reaction to this incident demonstrates once again that many people in Britain just cannot see that Israel’s enemies are our enemies. Not because we want it that way. But because our enemies want it that way. Much of the British commentariat seem desperate to pretend it isn’t so, because they wish it wasn’t so.
As they continue trying to wish the uncomfortable facts away I do wish they’d listen to the Egyptian Yemen-based cleric Wagdi Ghoneim. Wagdi’s not always been a favourite of mine. But yesterday, on Al-Jazeera, he explained: “Hamas is fighting America, Europe and all the crusader West.”
Exactly. Which is why we should be thankful to Israel for fighting for all of us.
Nothing about the situation there is easy, and romantic adventures undertaken by idealistic westerners will not make it easy. Nor will the “Allah wants the Jews killed” in the Hamas charter make it easy either. Nevertheless, there are people of serious mind in the world and of serious purpose, who really are doing those things that can be done. This man is one of them: palestinenote.com/cs/blogs/topnews/archive/2010/05/11/nablus-philanthropist-to-broker-peace-with-hamas.aspx. There are others; some of whom I know and others I do not know. It would probably surprise you to know who is actually on speaking terms, even friendly relations with whom over there.Really, is every country in Europe ruled by ‘tinhorn dictators’? The fact is that for decades the entire world has agreed on how to settle this conflict with Israel and the US being the sole rejectionists who are blocking that settlement. Where is your evidence that Israel and the PA are close to an agreement? They’ve been negotiating in this so called ‘peace-process’ for 17 years and an agreement has only gotten further away, both sides are admitting these ‘peace talks’ are not serious and are not going to lead to any settlement, but here you come making these outlandish claims without any evidence at all.
Hamas has repeatedly offered (including just last week) to end the conflict with Israel if it were to just withdraw to the 1967 borders and allow an independent Palestinian state to be established. They are not the obstacle to a two-state solution, the obstacle is that Israel does not want to withdraw from Palestinian lands.
I must disagree here. Israel wants people to start thinking the two-state solution has become impossible so it can get away with annexing Palestinian lands, we mustn’t give them excuses. All Israel has to do is say “ok we’re leaving” and take all its soldiers out of the occupied territories. They don’t even need to dismantle settlements like they did in Gaza (which was obviously an unnecessary media stunt), just say we’re leaving and anyone who wants to stay can stay. Most would leave of their own accord, as they only live in settlements because Israel heavily subsidizes them and gives settlers massive tax-breaks to encourage people to move there.
Indeed. A blockade which has been condemned by the UN as illegal and a ‘medieval seige’. A blockade that Amnesty International just last week called ‘a flagrant violation of international law’ which was ‘deepening Gaza’s ongoing humanitarian crisis’ and was ‘a form of collective punishment of Gazans’. A blockade that UN’s Elders (people like Nelson Mandela, Jimmy Carter, Bishop Tutu) also just called ‘one of the world’s greatest human rights violations’. A blockade which the World Health Organisation last week said is blocking vital medical supplies from entering the territory.It was not solely going there to provide humanitarian aid. It was a protest to undermine the blockade, and that was know before hand.
Yes, and many of similar stripe blame Cuba’s wretched poverty on the U.S. Never mind that torturers and murderers run the country and live well while others starve. It’s all the U.S.’ fault notwithstanding the slave labor and the imprisonments for saying what one thinks. It’s all the U.S.’ fault when 90% of the Cuban population supports the 10% (in luxury) who rule with the gun.Indeed. A blockade which has been condemned by the UN as illegal and a ‘medieval seige’. A blockade that Amnesty International just last week called ‘a flagrant violation of international law’ which was ‘deepening Gaza’s ongoing humanitarian crisis’ and was ‘a form of collective punishment of Gazans’. A blockade that UN’s Elders (people like Nelson Mandela, Jimmy Carter, Bishop Tutu) also just called ‘one of the world’s greatest human rights violations’. A blockade which the World Health Organisation is blocking vital medical supplies from entering the territory.
A blockade which in March 2008 Amnesty International, Care International UK, Cafod, Christian Aid, Medecins du Monde UK, Oxfam, Save the Children UK and Trocaire published a report saying had caused the worst humanitarian crisis in Gaza since 1967. A blockade which lead then UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and former Irish President Mary Robinson to say when visiting Gaza in November 2008 ‘their whole civilisation has been destroyed, I’m not exaggerating. It’s almost unbelievable that the world doesn’t care while this is happening’. A blockade which last June the Red Cross in a report called ‘Gaza: 1.5 million people trapped in despair’ said had mostly destroyed Gaza’s healthcare services.
A blockade which lead the head of Gaza’s United Nations Work and Relief Agency John Ging to say ‘the situation is desperate, devastating and unbearable. Each day that passes brings more misery and suffering’. A blockade which last September the Goldstone report called a possible crime against humanity. A blockade which last January lead Human Rights Watch to publish a report called ‘Deprived and Endangered: Humanitarian Crisis in the Gaza Strip’ detailing the suffering, and send a letter to Hillary Clinton calling the blockade ‘collective punishment of Gaza’s civilian population - a serious violation of international law’ and demand that she pressure the Israeli government to lift it immediately.
A blockade which the Israelis began by saying "the idea is to put the Palestinians on a diet. They’ll get a lot thinner, but they won’t die’.
Of course they were trying to stop this blockade.
And also from the Israeli perspective it is trying to stop a grave security threat. If you fear for your safety what is legal and what is not, what is deemed acceptable and unacceptable by third parties, starts to be come a moot point. So I don’t think that it is fantasy to think that this mission could be considered by some as a mission to try to ultimatly open up weapon shipments into Gaza.Indeed. A blockade which has been condemned by the UN as illegal and a ‘medieval seige’. A blockade that Amnesty International just last week called ‘a flagrant violation of international law’ which was ‘deepening Gaza’s ongoing humanitarian crisis’ and was ‘a form of collective punishment of Gazans’. A blockade that UN’s Elders (people like Nelson Mandela, Jimmy Carter, Bishop Tutu) also just called ‘one of the world’s greatest human rights violations’. A blockade which the World Health Organisation last week said is blocking vital medical supplies from entering the territory.
A blockade which in March 2008 Amnesty International, Care International UK, Cafod, Christian Aid, Medecins du Monde UK, Oxfam, Save the Children UK and Trocaire published a report saying had caused the worst humanitarian crisis in Gaza since 1967. A blockade which lead then UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and former Irish President Mary Robinson to say when visiting Gaza in November 2008 ‘their whole civilisation has been destroyed, I’m not exaggerating. It’s almost unbelievable that the world doesn’t care while this is happening’. A blockade which last June the Red Cross in a report called ‘Gaza: 1.5 million people trapped in despair’ said had mostly destroyed Gaza’s healthcare services.
A blockade which lead the head of Gaza’s United Nations Work and Relief Agency John Ging to say ‘the situation is desperate, devastating and unbearable. Each day that passes brings more misery and suffering’. A blockade which last September the Goldstone report called a possible crime against humanity. A blockade which last January lead Human Rights Watch to publish a report called ‘Deprived and Endangered: Humanitarian Crisis in the Gaza Strip’ detailing the suffering, and send a letter to Hillary Clinton calling the blockade ‘collective punishment of Gaza’s civilian population - a serious violation of international law’ and demand that she pressure the Israeli government to lift it immediately.
A blockade which the Israelis began by saying "the idea is to put the Palestinians on a diet. They’ll get a lot thinner, but they won’t die’.
Of course they were trying to stop this blockade.
No it’s not. The Israelis themselves say the blockade is not about security, but rather is ‘economic warfare’ designed to punish Gaza’s civilian population. As I said before Ariel Sharon’s spokesman Dov Weissglass announced the blockade by saying “the idea is to put the Palestinians on a diet. They’ll get a lot thinner, but they won’t die”, what does that have to do with security? Do Palestinians eat weapons? Have the Israelis forbidden coriander, sage, ginger, seeds, nuts, dried fruit, oranges, pasta, insulin, tea, coffee, fresh meat, paper, books, newspapers, fabrics, clothes, shoes, blankets, lifestock, potato chips, vinegar etc… because Palestinians could use them as weapons? When they invaded Gaza a year and a half ago did they destroy Gaza’s main chicken farm in Gaza with tanks killing 65,000 chickens, bomb Gaza’s only operating flour mill, bomb Gaza’s sewage works, destroy Gaza’s zoo killing all its animals, because these places posed a threat to its security? Be serious.And also from the Israeli perspective it is trying to stop a grave security threat. If you fear for your safety what is legal and what is not, what is deemed acceptable and unacceptable by third parties, starts to be come a moot point. So I don’t think that it is fantasy to think that this mission could be considered by some as a mission to try to ultimatly open up weapon shipments into Gaza.
So that stuff is on the blockade but weapons are allowed in? If you want me to be serious, could it be that it may be done to try to stop the flow and also to with hold other goods. It would be a false dichotomy to say that the only two reasons for the blockade would be to stop the flow of weapons or to stop the flow of consumer goods.No it’s not. The Israelis themselves say the blockade is not related to security, but rather is ‘economic warfare’ designed to punish Gaza’s civilian population. As I said before Ariel Sharon’s spokesman Dov Weissglass announced the blockade by saying “the idea is to put the Palestinians on a diet. They’ll get a lot thinner, but they won’t die”, what does that have to do with security? Do Palestinians eat weapons? Have the Israelis forbidden coriander, sage, ginger, seeds, nuts, dried fruit, oranges, pasta, insulin, tea, coffee, fresh meat, paper, books, newspapers, fabrics, clothes, shoes, blankets, lifestock, potato chips, vinegar etc… because Palestinians could use them as weapons? Be serious.
But, if it’s to stop the flow of weapons, why are the things Kadaveri listed (and many others) prohibited, too?So that stuff is on the blockade but weapons are allowed in? If you want me to be serious, could it be that it may be done to try to stop the flow and also to with hold other goods. It would be a false dichotomy to say that the only two reasons for the blockade would be to stop the flow of weapons or to stop the flow of consumer goods.
It would be a false dichotomy to think that the aim would only have to be to stop the flow of weapons.But, if it’s to stop the flow of weapons, why are the things Kadaveri listed (and many others) prohibited, too?
So it is also the collective punishment of the Palestinian people?It would be a false dichotomy to think that the aim would only have to be to stop the flow of weapons.
No sir. It’s apt. Like Castro and his killers, Hamas keeps Palestinians in poverty and wretchedness, and for what? Here’s from their charter:I agree. So don’t drag in Cuba and Che Guevara to distract people from the issue.