Defending the Catholic Faith

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2nd_Adam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Of course as this is a Catholic forum the phrase would go somewhat differently. The majority here would invert mormonism and catholicism and many would push mormonism into the position of calvinism while finding words to accurately describe the thoughts about each.
 
Of course as this is a Catholic forum the phrase would go somewhat differently. The majority here would invert mormonism and catholicism and many would push mormonism into the position of calvinism while finding words to accurately describe the thoughts about each.
I think if you put Calvinism in the same position as Mormonism, you are not in line with the Magestrium. 😉 It seems many Catholics cannot discern their own Catholic Faith? According to official Catholic dogma, who are your brothers in Christ, Mormons or Protestants? I find your posting to be very very sad, causing division in the body of Christ. I thought good Catholics obey the Magestrium?

818 "However, one cannot charge with the sin of the separation those who at present are born into these communities [that resulted from such separation] and in them are brought up in the faith of Christ, and the Catholic Church accepts them with respect and affection as brothers … All who have been justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians, and with good reason are accepted as brothers in the Lord by the children of the Catholic Church."272
 
Of course as this is a Catholic forum the phrase would go somewhat differently. The majority here would invert mormonism and catholicism and many would push mormonism into the position of calvinism while finding words to accurately describe the thoughts about each.
Some people when they find that they have no winning arguments left, instead of “repenting” and acknowledging the truth, they try to drive the other side out of the board by unfair means, and deny him (or her) the opportunity to argue or present his or her case. That is dishonest, dishonorable, and amounts to cheating and foul play. That is typical Evangelical/Protestant/Calvinist/Reformed/Baptist behavior – so I have noticed.
 
I simply would place mormonism further down the list from truth from Calvinism since Mormonism is much deeper into heresy (from a catholic view). By saying put them in the place of calvinists i never intended a cohabitation of the position. Although of course calvinism is not what you;d call my cup of tea either although i place it ahead of mormonism in seperation from catholicism since it hasn;t fallen as far away as mormonism.

I did not deny them the right to be called christians. Needless to say, taking my words and saying that i hate or somehow deny the christianity of the groups involved is far out of context. I merely state that in accordance with the fact that majority of people that are catholic here Zerinus statement would be incorrect (for them) in claiming mormonism to be truth.

Likewise Zerinus your statement saying mormonism is “Truth” could be considered the same thing as what you say evangelicals, etc do. My statement inferred that as most people here are catholics they naturally would consider the Catholic Church the truth. our statement could be considered as self exultance. I simply stated the common opinion.

We are called to act in a state of kindness and brotherly friendship to all peoples and beliefs (even those that spite us), however that does not negate informing people of their error. Of course im far from what you’d call a born evangelist so what i say usually is rather blunt. I tend to be a purist on always saying the truth even if that causes discontent. Lies beget lies.
 
Some people when they find that they have no winning arguments left, instead of “repenting” and acknowledging the truth, they try to drive the other side out of the board by unfair means, and deny him (or her) the opportunity to argue or present his or her case. That is dishonest, dishonorable, and amounts to cheating and foul play. That is typical Evangelical/Protestant/Calvinist/Reformed/Baptist behavior – so I have noticed.
Why do you separate Evangelicals and Catholics? We are really one in spiritual reality. Even the Catholic Catechism verfies that Evangelicals are brothers in Christ. I don’t think Catholics believe in the Mormon gospel, nor do they believe that Joseph Smith is a true prophet of God. What is your true agenda on this Christian Forum site? When I discuss things with Mormons on this site, I am defending the Christian Faith where Catholics and Evangelicals are one.
 
I simply would place mormonism further down the list from truth from Calvinism since Mormonism is much deeper into heresy (from a catholic view). By saying put them in the place of calvinists i never intended a cohabitation of the position. Although of course calvinism is not what you;d call my cup of tea either although i place it ahead of mormonism in seperation from catholicism since it hasn;t fallen as far away as mormonism.

I did not deny them the right to be called christians. Needless to say, taking my words and saying that i hate or somehow deny the christianity of the groups involved is far out of context. I merely state that in accordance with the fact that majority of people that are catholic here Zerinus statement would be incorrect (for them) in claiming mormonism to be truth.

Likewise Zerinus your statement saying mormonism is “Truth” could be considered the same thing as what you say evangelicals, etc do. My statement inferred that as most people here are catholics they naturally would consider the Catholic Church the truth. our statement could be considered as self exultance. I simply stated the common opinion.

We are called to act in a state of kindness and brotherly friendship **to all peoples **and beliefs (even those that spite us), however that does not negate informing people of their error. Of course im far from what you’d call a born evangelist so what i say usually is rather blunt. I tend to be a purist on always saying the truth even if that causes discontent. Lies beget lies.
Do you think the Magestrium applies this to Mormons?
818 "However, one cannot charge with the sin of the separation those who at present are born into these communities [that resulted from such separation] and in them are brought up in the faith of Christ, and the Catholic Church accepts them with respect and affection as brothers … All who have been justified by faith in Baptism are incorporated into Christ; they therefore have a right to be called Christians, and with good reason are accepted as brothers in the Lord by the children of the Catholic Church."272
 
Why do you separate Evangelicals and Catholics?
I do not separate them. They separated themselves—long ago.
What is your true agenda on this Christian Forum site?
My agenda is to discuss the gospel, answer questions about Mormonism, and prevent people like you from misrepresenting it.
 
I do not consider Mormonism one with Christianity but a seperate religion. This is due to their fundamental departure from historic Christianity and their use of a seperate gospel & book other than the bible. If the Catholic Church believes the same i will not say, as i am not certain of the official view.

However just because mormons are not christians does not mean we don;t act towards them in charity and grace. We are not called to act differently to christians then to other religions adherents. All men are equal before the eyes of God. Therefore all people deserve equal treatment, whether they are christian or and adherent of another religion. In this the Magisterium agrees.

However treating all people equally does not mean sitting in a circle singing kumbaya. It does not mean compromising my beliefs or failing to correct (If possible) and discuss the beliefs of other religions.

My previous post which began the original discussion simply set out to point out the obvious fact that most people here would not call mormonism truth, and that some would put it below calvinism at the abominable spot. Personally id put it further down the line on the path of heresy but i would not call it abominable, that position lies with other less savoury beliefs. Yet even to them we are called to act with kindness and grace.
 
I do not consider Mormonism one with Christianity but a seperate religion. . . .
Mormons consider historical Christianity to be Apostate, therefore there is an element of truth in what you say. From our perspective, Mormonism is the only true form of Christianity; therefore your statement from our point of view would translate into: “I do not consider true Christianity to be one with Apostate Christianity;” and of course there is an element of truth in that.
 
And so a mutual agreement from our opposing perspectives is reached. On that we can both agree.
 
Mormon baptism is not considered valid by the Catholic Church because Mormons don’t accept the Trinity.
Thank you for the official answer. Many Catholics are not able to discern who are considered your brothers in Christ from those who are not considered to be your brothers in Christ according to the Catholic Catechism. Maybe some Catholics need to read their Bible and the Catechism too… just kidding bro. You have been great, but a few on this site are quite irrational in their postings.
 
Thank you for the official answer. Many Catholics are not able to discern who are considered your brothers in Christ from those who are not considered to be your brothers in Christ according to the Catholic Catechism. Maybe some Catholics need to read their Bible and the Catechism too… just kidding bro. You have been great, but a few on this site are quite irrational in their postings.
I think you are right. The more Catholics reading their bibles and catechism, the less irrational posts by Catholics we would have. CAF serves at least as many Catholics as it does non-Catholics!
 
Thank you for the official answer. Many Catholics are not able to discern who are considered your brothers in Christ from those who are not considered to be your brothers in Christ according to the Catholic Catechism. Maybe some Catholics need to read their Bible and the Catechism too… just kidding bro. You have been great, but a few on this site are quite irrational in their postings.
I agree that many Catholics don’t understand their faith.

My wife was raised Catholic and spent 16 years in Catholic schools. Still, she said that she didn’t really learn the faith until the last few years, based in large part on EWTN and the reading that it inspires.

The Church was greatly damaged by the liberalism that attacked America as a whole in the 60s.
 
I agree that many Catholics don’t understand their faith.

My wife was raised Catholic and spent 16 years in Catholic schools. Still, she said that she didn’t really learn the faith until the last few years, based in large part on EWTN and the reading that it inspires.

The Church was greatly damaged by the liberalism that attacked America as a whole in the 60s.
I think the orthodox Catholic Faith to be very good in regards to its overall doctrine. Many Protestants are responding to what they hear from lay Catholics that they know. However, many lay Catholics do not represent official Catholic teaching. Therefore, Protestants tend to over-react to what is usually not the official Catholic belief on a topic. I can understand why some grounded Protestants are now Catholic. However, I think it’s an over-reaction from the problems of Protestantism.
 
I think the orthodox Catholic Faith to be very good in regards to its overall doctrine. Many Protestants are responding to what they hear from lay Catholics that they know. However, many lay Catholics do not represent official Catholic teaching. Therefore, Protestants tend to over-react to what is usually not the official Catholic belief on a topic**. I can understand why some grounded Protestants are now Catholic. However, I think it’s an over-reaction from the problems of Protestantism**.
It is interesting to read this perspective. I have always thought the Reformation was an over reaction to the behavior problems of European Roman Catholic clerics. 😃
 
It is interesting to read this perspective. I have always thought the Reformation was an over reaction to the behavior problems of European Roman Catholic clerics. 😃
There was a movement that came out of a Reformed circles about 6 years ago, which went beyonnd Reformed distinctives. The movement had a few nicknames. One of the nickname to this sub group was called a Catholic Calvinism. 😉 I still believe that the Reformation was caused by God.
 
It is interesting to read this perspective. I have always thought the Reformation was an over reaction to the behavior problems of European Roman Catholic clerics. 😃
The Catholic Church, and especially the clerical establishment, was indeed very corrupt at the time of the Reformation. Luther’s rebellion had a justifiable cause from that point of view. But then he went off the beaten track, and introduced serious heresies that took Protestantism down a blind alley and in a wrong direction. His most serious heresy was “justification by faith alone without works,” followed by his rejection of most Catholic sacraments, and the requirement of an ordained priesthood. It had one desirable outcome from the Catholic point of view, however, and that was providing the impetus for a genuine reform of the Catholic Church, which came into effect with the Council of Trent. Whether the Catholic Church would have conducted that reform without the impetus of the Protestant revolt, one can never know for sure.
 
There was a movement that came out of a Reformed circles about 6 years ago, which went beyonnd Reformed distinctives. The movement had a few nicknames. One of the nickname to this sub group was called a Catholic Calvinism. 😉 I still believe that the Reformation was caused by God.
The Reformation was not caused by God. Nothing good came out of the Reformation that was meant to be good. Any good that came out of it, came in spite of it, not because of it. God has His own ways of making good to come out of the evil actions of others. One obvious good was the genuine reform of the Catholic Church, as mentioned in my previous post. I will tell you another good thing that came out of the Reformation. It indirectly led to the establishment of a government in the United States that separated religion from government, and guaranteed religious freedom for all citizens, thus paving the way for the Restoration of the Gospel. The Restoration could not have taken place in continental Europe, because the necessary religious freedoms did not exist to facilitate it. Religion was used as a tool of politics, and religious descent of various kinds was repressed. The Constitution of the United States was set up by people who had known religious persecution in Europe and had escaped from it; and they had a keen interest in ensuring that government would remain separate from religion; and that the religious freedoms of the citizens would not be trampled upon by a government that favored one particular religion over another. That indeed came from God, and provided the right environment in which the Restoration of the gospel in the last days could take place. God moves in mysterious ways, His wonders to perform!
 
There was a movement that came out of a Reformed circles about 6 years ago, which went beyonnd Reformed distinctives. The movement had a few nicknames. One of the nickname to this sub group was called a Catholic Calvinism. 😉
Well, this is why I spend so much time here. I learn something new every day! 👍
I still believe that the Reformation was caused by God.
Of course you would have to, otherwise you would not be able to cling to the fruits of it. It is similar to Catholics calling the Fall of Adam “oh necessary sin of Adam”.

However, God never “causes” sin, separation, division, devouring of the members of His Body and departure from what He instituted. There were plenty of sins on both sides of the Reformation. None of them were “caused by God”.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top