A
anon52328184
Guest
i watched the video of the mass in england. but myers is in minnesota. am i missing something? i can’t tell for sure from the video if the people have not received holy communion.
That was the thought running through my head. For some reason God has permitted this…I can’t imagine why but I have faith that he can bring some good out of this evil.Jesus allowed it then and He is allowing it today for reasons that only God knows.
I was thinking the same thing earlier.I’m wondering what of the people that provided him with the Precious Body of our Lord. Who was the Judas in this case…and for substantially less then 30 pieces of silver I imagine.
How horrifying a situation they will eventually find themselves in…
They have my prayers.
Why hasn’t he posted a video of his action or some such thing? Personally I wouldn’t be suprised if he did no such thing and is just enjoying the number of angry emotional emails he is getting, he’s obviously quite the egotist. If his point was really to discredit the Eucharist(via terribly flawed logic) he’d have shown what he did, not just expected everyone to take his word for it.
How devastatingly true…UNLESS there is a conversion…of which I am praying for…I find it quite ironic that his name is Paul.:ehh: And I am praying with you Christina that The Lord will bring some sort of a mass conversion to these people…I can dream…but with God ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE!!He may escape the punishments many here believe he should have due to ignorance. After all, he simply has no idea what he is doing.
I’m wondering what of the people that provided him with the Precious Body of our Lord. Who was the Judas in this case…and for substantially less then 30 pieces of silver I imagine.
How horrifying a situation they will eventually find themselves in…
They have my prayers.
You were wrong that tolerance is mandated in the way you think. As noted in his blog, he also desecrated a page from the Quran. However, under the law he doesn’t appear to have committed any crime. Many people misunderstand hate crimes, but in most cases in the US they are simply versions of crimes aggravated by the intent of harming a larger group. One might characterize the murder of the priest by a Catholic-hater as a hate crime, since it was the crime of murder, but it also was meant as an attack upon the Catholic community. On the other hand, wearing a button saying “Father X is leading his congregation to hell” would not be a hate crime, because you have the hate but not the crime. In fact, that qualifies as protected speech or expression. Same with the nutty professor.So, what I want to know is–why isn’t his college booting him out for promoting and carrying out a “hate crime?” If he’d burned a copy of the Torah or called Mohammed names or defaced a statue of the Buddha, he’d be out on his ear. I thought tolerance meant tolerance for all faiths and philosophies not just for those that are “politically correct.” I guess I was wrong about that.
And I submit that crimes don’t have to be on the level of murder to be hate a crimes, but they probably wouldn’t all be prosecuted, unfortunately, because the court system wouldn’t be able to handle the load.You were wrong that tolerance is mandated in the way you think. As noted in his blog, he also desecrated a page from the Quran. However, under the law he doesn’t appear to have committed any crime. Many people misunderstand hate crimes, but in most cases in the US they are simply versions of crimes aggravated by the intent of harming a larger group. One might characterize the murder of the priest by a Catholic-hater as a hate crime, since it was the crime of murder, but it also was meant as an attack upon the Catholic community. On the other hand, wearing a button saying “Father X is leading his congregation to hell” would not be a hate crime, because you have the hate but not the crime. In fact, that qualifies as protected speech or expression. Same with the nutty professor.
Some have speculated that the host was stolen, so if true possession of stolen goods could be a crime, but it doesn’t lend itself easily to an upgrade to hate crime.
Apparently, not:It has been pointed out a number of times (not necessarily here) that he is in direct violation of the code of ethics outlined by the college.
I wonder if they are going to punish him in any way?
