Did Russians interfere in the 2016 U.S. elections and is such interference acceptable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lynnvinc
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t like any of the choices in the poll. I like the choice that says Russians did probably try to interfere with the election like President Obama tried to influence the elections in Israel and if I’m not mistaken–he spent our money trying to do it. Or is that just fake news??? Now was Obama backing the opponent because he liked him better, had him in his pocket??? or just HATED BEEBEE that much.?

Here’s a link I found…
newsmax.com/JohnFund/israel-netanyahu-election-hillary/2015/03/18/id/630817/
 
After the investigation into allegations of improper interference in the election from the Russians are they going to move on to investigating CNN and CBS over the same issue?
Agreed. Next is the media for their interference in the election!
 
Podesta who was Hillary’s campaign manager?] was actively working for and taking money from Russian banksters.
Is there a link for this and why hasn’t this been in the news???
As an aside—someone was bashing Trump for something on Fox news and the host was trying to ask why they didn’t call Hilary on the same type of action. The “bash-er” said simply—“Trump won!” Meaning anything Hilary did is not open for discussion because she LOST! I thought that was FUNNY!
 
Why can’t
everyone get behind the president and work together for the good of the country?
Because they believe the president is not working for the good of the country, just as the Republicans did not believe Obama was working for the good of the country and refused to get behind him.
 
How can you claim Russia interfered, yet you claim you won the popular vote? Where is this massive interference?
Getting Hillary to lose to Mickey Mouse would have been “massive interference.” As it is, it would have been a close election even without illegal interference. So it does not take “massive interference” to change the outcome.
 
I’m still waiting to see how Russia influenced the election. Does anybody know?
 
I seriously doubt that they actually interfered but if they did we should pull the plank out of our eye before crying foul in light of all the interference the so-called US intelligence community has pulled in elections around the world for decades.
 
I seriously doubt that they actually interfered but if they did we should pull the plank out of our eye before crying foul in light of all the interference the so-called US intelligence community has pulled in elections around the world for decades.
👍

Exactly.
 
Putin didn’t have to attempt making the Clintons look bad. Over the past decades, the couple has done an incredibly efficient job of making themselves look bad. None of the “revelations” about Hillary or Bill surprised their detractors. Their supporters were immune to the same.
You left out the very large middle that were neither detractors nor supporters. They are the ones most susceptible to “revelations.” It only takes a few minds changed to change the outcome of the election.
 
You left out the very large middle that were neither detractors nor supporters. They are the ones most susceptible to “revelations.” It only takes a few minds changed to change the outcome of the election.
Yet you have no problem what the extremely biased media did during the campaign?
 
If the Russians did interfere in the election they were ineffective.

As evidenced by the caterwauling about the Electoral College and the subsequent calls for impeachment, as well as the insistance that our republic is a democracy, at least half the country is woefully ignorant. Citizens lack basic, elementary understanding of the U.S. Constitution, the difference between democratic republics and democracies, how our system of government operates during elections or how an elected federal office holder is accused, placed on trial and sentenced if found guilty under the impeachment process. If the goal was to undermine confidence in our process, the Russians were laughably overestimating the competence of the voters.

Putin didn’t have to attempt making the Clintons look bad. Over the past decades, the couple has done an incredibly efficient job of making themselves look bad. None of the “revelations” about Hillary or Bill surprised their detractors. Their supporters were immune to the same.

Perhaps, the DNC was exposed as being much worse than previously thought by some. In the estimation of the voting block that supported the president, the DNC has been shooting itself in the foot for years, dealt itself a fatal blow with its platform revision for the 2012 federal election, and nailed its own coffin shut in 2015. At least the members of this group with whom I am personally aware knew they had to choose either an Independent candidate (if a viable one could be found) or default to a Republican - regardless of the individual debate performances or who won the primaries.
If you believed that Hillary had extremely poor health during the campaign than you were probably influenced by the Russians.
 
I get it now. The dems are angry that the truth about their candidate came out!!! Oh, no, we should not have known the truth!

Talk about intefering!
 
From what I understand they tried to get at republican computers, but guess what? They were secure! So, again, when did telling the truth become interfering?
Telling the truth when it hurts one side and keeping silent when the truth hurts the other side is interfering.
 
Nah, video from the MSM was all that was needed.
Those stories were fake. If you believed them you were tricked. Hillary’s health is fine now. If she was seriously sick she had a miracle recovery at the exact moment the campaign ended.

This article is from November: Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say
The speed and coordination of these efforts allowed Russian-backed phony news to outcompete traditional news organizations for audience. Some of the first and most alarming tweets after Clinton fell ill at a Sept. 11 memorial event in New York, for example, came from Russian botnets and trolls, researchers found. (She was treated for pneumonia and returned to the campaign trail a few days later.)
This followed a spate of other misleading stories in August about Clinton’s supposedly troubled health. The Daily Beast debunked a particularly widely read piece in an article that reached 1,700 Facebook accounts and was read online more than 30,000 times. But the PropOrNot researchers found that the version supported by Russian propaganda reached 90,000 Facebook accounts and was read more than 8 million times. The researchers said the true Daily Beast story was like “shouting into a hurricane” of false stories supported by the Russians.
This is another one from November that looks interesting, haven’t finished reading it yet myself:

Trolling for Trump: How Russia Is Trying to Destroy Our Democracy
 
Those stories were fake. If you believed them you were tricked. Hillary’s health is fine now. If she was seriously sick she had a miracle recovery at the exact moment the campaign ended.

This article is from November: Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say

This is another one from November that looks interesting, haven’t finished reading it yet myself:

Trolling for Trump: How Russia Is Trying to Destroy Our Democracy
What about all the cries she won the popular vote? How did that happen if we are to believe Russsia interfered with the elections? Which one are yall really lying about?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top