Disagreeing with Canceling Holy Week

  • Thread starter Thread starter andre03051
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Major powers like China do not have our best interest in mind, and want us destroyed. As our economy weakens, so does our military. I am not suggesting we (our country, our military) is so depleted today that China or Russia could take advantage. We are far from that, but there are military experts out there that discuss this.
 
I’ve been on a financial journey over the past year and totally agree. I recently received a huge promotion and raise and all of my financial plans are very prudent but for all I know I could be laid off soon. I will bounce back and have a plan if that happens but I’m still not as secure as I would like. This crisis made me realize I need to stockpile a much bigger emergency fund to feel comfortable. I was striving for the Dave Ramsey suggested 3-6 months but now I want to be able to live modestly for a whole year without income, so am aiming for 50% off my annual salary. I can’t save that much overnight but it is doable with a few adjustments. Hopefully this experience will wake more people up to how helpless you are without a solid savings.
 
Major powers like China do not have our best interest in mind, and want us destroyed. As our economy weakens, so does our military. I am not suggesting we (our country, our military) is so depleted today that China or Russia could take advantage. We are far from that, but there are military experts out there that discuss this.
But my question to you is what can we do other than what we are doing putting the economy on the backburner in order to save lives? Without strict measures millions could die. That is just the bottom line.
 
None of these pet projects can circumvent the reality that they all call for lots of people out and about; and working priests half to death; at a time when a very poorly-understood (and perhaps mutating) virus continues to cause a growing death toll and a growing number of infections daily.

It’s the usual “my right to mass trumps your right to life;” it’s arrogant; and it also fails to recognize how often people have foregone mass in human history (I.e., sailors on long voyages; explorers; prisoners; etc.)

It’s beating a dead horse at this point.
This. 1,000 times this.
 
Who’s going to do all of the set up and sanitation work between Mass, theoreticolly putting them in a higher risk position of contraction.
Me! Let me know when and where. To get the mass to the people I am all in. Many priests would be willing to say many more masses to take care of their flock.
 
Everyone’s gung ho to volunteer.

Too bad every volunteer is a potentially infected person or carrier (or will become one the moment they are present at a mass, circa April 6, 2020).

If you want to take foolish risks with your life, fine. But I don’t get why people are so bent on willingly placing themselves in situations where they can easily spread the virus to others. Like I said about arrogance…
 
Last edited:
If you are willing to discuss this civilly I will respond. But every time someone on here mentions any other options or the potential worse downstream impact that is being caused, people harpoon them.

So I have my position, and you have yours, and I’m tired of being called a heartless murderer and “that guy wants to kill grannie”, so I’m going to save my fingers from all the typing.
 
This crisis made me realize I need to stockpile a much bigger emergency fund to feel comfortable.
I want to illustrate a point here, not because I am for or against it, for I will say neither, nor indicate agreement or disagreement. This is simply to illustrate that people’s viewpoints are different and can be valid for different reasons.

I watched a nurse on television last night who apparently got caught speeding on the way home from the hospital, taking care of people with covid19. The police offer knew she was a nurse and stopped her to give her five N95 masks he was given by the force. He said, only condition, is don’t speed the rest of the way home.

She then proceeded to get angry about all of the people who were “stock-piling” and “hoarding” food because she was on the front line taking care of people and those people should be ashamed of themselves, and there is no need for this emotional reaction and you are taking away food from people.

My point in telling you all this is because, 1) I’m fairly sure none of you will jump on that nurse because right now she is doing great work, and 2) because I guarantee people are a buying more than what they need for the next week because they are scared, and they want to protect their family, and so her opinion is her opinion and simply because everyone here has expressed theirs doesn’t necessarily make them right, or wrong, and because I express mine does not make me evil.

Someone could easily say to the people who are now somewhat worried and doing things to maybe ensure your family is safe, by buying extra groceries (e.g.: rice, pastas, canned foods, flour, etc.) that they are all evil people, taking food away from others, and keeping 6 months of money on hand, and call them names… but that wouldn’t be the right thing to do would it?

So when I express my opinion about how I feel, I hope we can stop from calling each other names.
 
Is bread more important than the body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus? You don’t have to answer. I do not wish. To argue. Just think we should think about our priorities. Also, we are not responsible for doing extraordinary things to save lives. Just things to think about.
 
I want to illustrate a point here, not because I am for or against it, for I will say neither, nor indicate agreement or disagreement. This is simply to illustrate that people’s viewpoints are different and can be valid for different reasons.

I watched a nurse on television last night who apparently got caught speeding on the way home from the hospital, taking care of people with covid19. The police offer knew she was a nurse and stopped her to give her five N95 masks he was given by the force. He said, only condition, is don’t speed the rest of the way home.

She then proceeded to get angry about all of the people who were “stock-piling” and “hoarding” food because she was on the front line taking care of people and those people should be ashamed of themselves, and there is no need for this emotional reaction and you are taking away food from people.

My point in telling you all this is because, 1) I’m fairly sure none of you will jump on that nurse because right now she is doing great work, and 2) because I guarantee people are a buying more than what they need for the next week because they are scared, and they want to protect their family, and so her opinion is her opinion and simply because everyone here has expressed theirs doesn’t necessarily make them right, or wrong, and because I express mine does not make me evil.

Someone could easily say to the people who are now somewhat worried and doing things to maybe ensure your family is safe, by buying extra groceries (e.g.: rice, pastas, canned foods, flour, etc.) that they are all evil people, taking food away from others, and keeping 6 months of money on hand, and call them names… but that wouldn’t be the right thing to do would it?

So when I express my opinion about how I feel, I hope we can stop from calling each other names.
??? All I mentioned was putting a lot of money in the bank for emergencies. I’m confused.
 
Last edited:
This is what some select few say.
And I respond, bread is more important because I can live without mass but I can’t live without food.

Now answer this, please: does or does not restarting mass place more people in jeopardy of infection?
 
Me! Let me know when and where. To get the mass to the people I am all in.
OK…so you’re “the one”. How far are you willing to travel? An hour…maybe two from where you’re at. Now…you’re putting yourself in the position of carrying the virus even that much further AND SPREADING IT… I am so lost on how individuals don’t see how it’s such a bad idea to congregate at this time…
Many priests would be willing to say many more masses to take care of their flock.
Really, how many priest have you been in contact with? Do you have their schedules synced to your phone? I already told you that Masses were being pulled back in my wife’s parish because the priest couldn’t keep up.
 
Is bread more important than the body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus? You don’t have to answer. I do not wish. To argue. Just think we should think about our priorities. Also, we are not responsible for doing extraordinary things to save lives. Just things to think about.
Is it more important for you to receive the Eucharist than for your neighbor to live?

It’s not asking for “extraordinary things” for you to refrain from attending Mass to stop the spread of a deadly virus.

How is it even possible that any Catholic would think this way?
 
Is it more important for you to receive the Eucharist than for your neighbor to live?

How is it even possible that any Catholic would think this way?
[/quote]

The problem with this point is that it is not accurate. There is no direct cause and effect relationship between the two. The more accurate question would be is it more important to receive the Eucharist without a break for a few months than it is to put one’s neighbor at greater risk of death. If you look at it accurately, you might see how it is possible for a Catholic to object to a complete cessation of public Mass. If you really do not understand how a Catholic could think this way, then it is best not to judge. For only when you truly understand the objection can you have an informed opinion.
Also, we are not responsible for doing extraordinary things to save lives.
To this I would respond that we are often called to do extraordinary things (in the literal sense) to save lives. The Church does teach that one does not have to use extraordinary medical measures to keep one alive, but that applies only to one who is terminal.

I thought of a parallel from Scripture. Those who were unclean under the law of Moses were barred from the assembly, the ordinary source of salvation, for the protection of the health of the rest of the assembly. Only after they were clean, and judged to be cleaned, were they permitted back in. I do not know if any bishop consciously thought of this parallel, but God did start the idea of lockdown to stop the spread of disease.
 
Don’t mean to be rude but do you know their schedules? Have you personally talked to them and asked them if they would?
[/quote]

More importantly, how do you know that they should? Not everyone is open or honest about (or even aware of) underlying conditions that put them at additional risk.
 
The problem with this point is that it is not accurate. There is no direct cause and effect relationship between the two. The more accurate question would be is it more important to receive the Eucharist without a break for a few months than it is to put one’s neighbor at greater risk of death.
It’s essentially the same point—receiving the Eucharist puts one well within six feet of the priest. And increases greatly the risk of spreading this disease.
If you look at it accurately, you might see how it is possible for a Catholic to object to a complete cessation of public Mass.
No one is suggesting a complete cessation --it’s temporary. I do understand the objection—I’ve just been astonished at Catholics who think their desire to receive Communion could justify risking the lives of innocent people.
 
—I’ve just been astonished at Catholics who think their desire to receive Communion could justify risking the lives of innocent people.
If it makes you feel better, I am sure there are some that are astonished that some Catholics do not have the desire to receive the Eucharist that they do. I have no dog in this fight, but I do understand that desire, and why people need protected. I also understand the limits of the six foot rule, and personally accommodate for it.

I am reminded of a line from a movie where the hero goes back for his wife against impossible odds and is told not to. He says something to the effect of, “Don’t ask me how I can go back for my wife, and I won’t ask you how you can not.” The issue is deeply emotional to people on both sides, and I think we do a disservice to ignore this aspect of the issue. I am mainly trying to address the OP position, and that it is okay to disagree with this action. It is not okay to disobey.

FYI, as to the six foot rule, I have an easy fix for me. I simply do not breathe while receiving communion. The purpose of the six foot rule is to prevent spread through coughs, with respiration not needing quite that distance. Masks help not only to filter particulate, but also to restrict respiratory air flow. Not breathing also stops respiratory air flow.
 
Last edited:
So how many priests will die holding public masses now, and will never be able to ever say mass again? When is it better to cut masses, now by choice or later due to a greater shortage of priests?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top