M
mamaslo
Guest
All I am saying is that maybe he didn’t know what they were looking for. From the things he has said it tells me that the catechesis in his upbringing…and during this was on the weak side. (like many of us who grew up post vatican 2).Are you for real?
I guess the OP has answered the Tribunal in an honest and direct fashion before, back then when he didn’t even think of ways to get around the questions to his own favour.
Look this is not some civil court. If one cunningly tries to get the court swayed, then God will still know whether the marriage was valid or not…
The marriage will be valid whether or not someone cuts out a detail or exaggerates some point in order to appear it was not valid after all.
Do you want this man to die in sin? Do you believe that a person can die in sin? I think alot of people who are very wellmeaning here are tempting the OP.
The church uses the tribunals to get to the truth about a marriage, and the questions they pose are very good to find out if a person was validly married.
We should also assume that this has happend in the case of the OP, although his wife has been behaving in a nasty way after the valid vows were made.
Look, no one can fool God, even if they can fool the tribunal. We should urge this brother to have the courage to look for the Truth, regardless of what he feels about it. Not to manipulate in anyway.
Its a known fact that there is abuse with the number of annullments granted to people. Even my canon lawyer teacher from Rome told me so… so the problem is most often not that the tribunals are too strict but quite the opposite…
The tribunal isn’t some mean authority trying to put him in his place. Neither is the church. I am not trying to tempt anything. In his heart he believes their verdict was wrong. All I am saying is read up on what they are looking for. Sure he was honest but there are certainly criteria that he didn’t meet and probably wasn’t properly prepared.
It is legal. A legal system, maybe in the world things are manipulated but if he didn’t prove to the Catholic tribunal that the marriage was not valid then either you are right and he did have a valid marriage but on the other hand they can only go on the facts presented and if he did not present the facts that prove he had an invalid marriage then he’s stuck. He can try again but with more education.
Now, he can correct me if I am wrong. He may have all his knowledge in order already, but since he feels rejected, my guess is that there is more to the story he either didn’t tell us, or he just didn’t know what he was doing. (through no fault of his own back then). If this is something he really wants to make straight without leaving the present situation, then he needs to research the “why?” of the matter.
yes, i am for real.