H
HarryStotle
Guest
I know. It’s called a “nested quote.” That is how it works on this forum.I only said this part
I didn’t write this part that was someone else
Last edited:
I know. It’s called a “nested quote.” That is how it works on this forum.I only said this part
I didn’t write this part that was someone else
That’s a bit far afield.Yep, not only “which wife”, but as Trump married a non-practicing Catholic outside of the Church, he is in an objectively invalid union.
The problem is the severity of the divide. How anyone could have voted Clinton is beyond me, either they are seriously naïve, or they also have an evil agenda.Catholics aren’t on the same page about Mass (type of music, Latin vs vernacular, dress), why should we be on the same page about the President?
With revisions…1 Corinthians
He cannot be held to the same statement. However, he is ostensible a Christian and the Bible does speak to his actions:I hope you meant that tongue-in-cheek. Donald Trump is not now and never has been Catholic. He is not bound to follow canon law with regards to marriage… For all we know, that was not the kind of instruction he was given.
Would that we cold re-write Scripture to our liking! I also didn’t vote for Obama, by the way, or take the definition of charity to mean I had to support all he did.With revisions…
OK, I’m taking the bait. Then bed. Well, you’ve quoted one (1) PhD (in what? who knows? English lit? Education?) Who wrote an article in…a peer-reviewed scientific journal? Nope. The Princeton Pro-Life something or other.You need to know that the question of whether a human fetus is a human being is not a matter of dispute among any embryologists, cell biologists, or any other related field of biology or science.
You need to change your opinion because it is incorrect.
Our Holy Father did not tell anyone how to vote. He spoke to how Christians ought to speak…that is, not only about walls. He said it can’t be all walls, not that there cannot justly be any defense of sovereign borders. Correcting something a candidate says is not the same as saying the other candidate does not need any correction.The problem is the severity of the divide. How anyone could have voted Clinton is beyond me, either they are seriously naïve, or they also have an evil agenda.
As Catholics the number one issue should be abortion and euthanasia, both of which Clinton and the Dems support, and even from our Pope, silence on this, only some comment about building walls which was a false narrative spread by fake media anyway.
So there are a number of problems with the west at the moment, even more so with the Church, and the peace of the world depends on the sanctity of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.
God Bless
Thank you for reading.
Neither do I, but I think you should recognize the good that Trump, Pence and the administration have done, and we should be thankful he won over Clinton. Come up with a better pro-life alternative in 2020 and I’ll be all for it.The nice thing about being both a Catholic and an American is that I don’t have to think everything Trump does is great (or even good).
Would that Scripture didn’t say, “Love your enemies, do good to those who hurt you,” and “Love your neighbor as yourself,” but it does, doesn’t it?Would that we cold re-write Scripture to our liking!
You seem to be neglecting the Democrats who would not vote for HRC. She didn’t win all the votes in the primaries, nor did she draw all the Democrats to vote.I said “Dems”…
And they’re obviously faux, as not one Dem expressed concern over the thought of B. Clinton being around young interns again, with all that free time on his hands…
Not. One. So please.
Okay, if that is what you meant, though this also means your post was a complete non-sequitur. I recommend not quote or replying to a post if you are going to a whole new topic, and it had nothing to do with me.I said “Dems”…
And they’re obviously faux, as not one Dem expressed concern over the thought of B. Clinton being around young interns again, with all that free time on his hands…
See. And that is a good point. It is why I also pray for President Trump, as I did for President Obama.Would that Scripture didn’t say, “Love your enemies, do good to those who hurt you,” and “Love your neighbor as yourself,” but it does, doesn’t it?
Admonishing a sinner is a spiritual act of mercy. It is not hatred to object to bad behavior or unjust policy. If you or I were President, I hope we’d want those around us to object when we were exhibiting bad judgment. That is the golden rule.Would that Scripture didn’t say, “Love your enemies, do good to those who hurt you,” and “Love your neighbor as yourself,” but it does, doesn’t it?
You’re a good man!HarryStotle:
See. And that is a good point. It is why I also pray for President Trump, as I did for President Obama.Would that Scripture didn’t say, “Love your enemies, do good to those who hurt you,” and “Love your neighbor as yourself,” but it does, doesn’t it?