per art 24 of the palestinian national charter of 1964 (not the revised 1968), the PNC did not claim influence over the west bank or gaza.
Well that would explain a great deal. I personally have not problem following both. Nothing in that guide is in anyone contradictory to Church doctrine and is founded in Church doctrine. I assure no pope said anything different. This being a Catholic website, I would think that what the Church says is paramount.
What is “it”. There is no antecedent for the pronoun.
depends on your interpretation of the guide. do you believe you can vote for a pro-abortion candidate over an anti-abortion candidate? if you do, you are reading it wrong.
LOL. I will take my own knowledge of grammar over yours. The language is quite understandable. For the record, the person I voted for, in both the primary and the November election was the pro-life candidate, more so than Hillary and Trump.
Yes, the Catholic Church teaches that this is a theoretical possibility. I have not seen a situation where I believe it applies, at least on the ballots I have participated in.pnewton:
you didn’t answer the question
if one is pro-abortion and the other is anti-abortion, you don’t have a choice.
It wasn’t addressed to me, but I’ll answer.
Yes, the court is important. But, voting for an idiot to get a Supreme is not a good trade off.
A small portion I define as 58% voter turnout and less that half of the voters voted for him. So, what’s that, 25%, of the registered voters voted for him.
No. You have been infected by the Trump propaganda machine. They are not fake news, This is a tactic from Germany in the early part of the 20th century. Do not believe Trump’s disparagement of the media or the law enforcement arms of the US government.
I think not. What is being alleged is that those of us who object to Trump’s disrespectful attitude and behavior toward women are hypocrites because we must be in the majority of Christians who admit to using pornography. First of all, we may be in the minority of Christians who do not look at porn, but even if so, those who have done such things may admit that it is wrong. Mr. Trump does not think there is anything wrong with the way he treats others (or, if he does, he has never given any indication that he does). A person may fall into sin, and be able to acknowledge it and repent of it. Or a person may engage in sin and justify it to himself and others.
I agree with that statement being silly. Unfortunately I can’t see what relevance it has to Trump misbehaving more each day, which prevents an improvementn of his reputation among those who will not dismiss such behaviors.
the choice was down to 2. one would continue the attack on the church and the other wouldn’t. it is as simple as that.
we aren’t a democracy.
not quite
it has nothing to do with trump and a person’s opinion of him.
The charge of hypocrisy can only be applied if the person who did the wrong act tried to defend a position that one’s own act was not wrong. If a person looked at porn, knew it was wrong, and can acknowledge it is wrong, then that person is not a hypocrite for telling someone else it is wrong. This is called integrity.
You actually didn’t have to vote for either of them. Voting for an idiot is still voting for an idiot.
I’m not sure what you mean. Your post seemed to indicate that you thought the majority of people wanted him to be president. They did not.
I find it absurd that someone who does not watch TV can have an opinion that a particular network is biased.
i disagree, it is the pot calling the kettle hot.
actions speak louder than words.
i posted it and that was not the accusation. that is the way you interpreted it. i explained it prior. he was accused. he trashed talked. you have no solid proof yet of the accusations and watchers of porn who are upset over trash talk are hypocrites. it is that easy.
agreed ! however, most of the candidates running were idiots.
the opposite. you are the one using “the majority of people”. i was just pointing out that a majority isn’t that important because we are not a democracy.
you do realize most networks have an internet presence. who relies on tv alone today? on twitter the fake stories are debated constantly. you get all of the angles. it is rather entertaining to read the heated tweets.
trump! hahaha! he puts out his own fake stories. MSM is a business and they cater to what sells. it isn’t about the truth anymore.
also altered news, the network changes the real story to reflect the network’s position. a classic example was katie couric’s pause. the selective editing altered the position of the participants.
You are absolutely correct, it’s the number of states you carry. It’s also true that only around 25% of registered voters voted for Trump.
A slanted story is not “fake”. It’s slanted. A fake story is something made up, like on InfoWars or the National Enquirer.
Debt is always a concern but a couple of things here.