But aren’t there many children without families? It would seem that even a family with an uninvolved father would be better than none at all. Plenty of children grow up healthy and happy with a single parent.
================================
That’s a quote from previous poster-- I havent worked out quoting yet.
In short, no. A family with an uninvolved or possibly resentful father is NOT better than none at all. Because frankly, we dont have “orphanages” in this country, we have foster situations (yes sometimes group). Why move from one bad situation to another?
And not all foster situations are bad either. My husband was a foster kid in a GREAT family, who had to wait 10 years before they could legally adopt him.
Children deserve to be loved and wanted. You should not take a child into your home if you are not prepared 100% to LOVE them and make them feel WANTED. If you have baggage or other emotions, they’ll know. It will be obvious.
not everyone is cut out for adoption. Thats just the truth. Not everyone can handle a child looking differently from you. Especially if that child is proud of their biological heritage, or particularly fixated on discovering their biological heritage. Children have a RIGHT to their own heritage, and not every person can put aside their own feelings/insecurities about this in order for the best interest of the child.
All you have to do is google “adult adoptee blog” and see what you get-- youll see an entire generation of people from the closed adoption era who have serious emotional trauma from their adoptive parents who (many time through no fault of their own) were UNPREPARED to deal with the issues that arise as children grow and question.
People have this pre-conceived concept of adoption in the United States, that its a win-win-win, and the truth is that is is NOT a win-win-win. There is always at LEAST one party who is losing. Sometimes that’s the “birthparent” (I prefer natural mother myself), and sometimes that’s the child! Sometimes it’s even the adoptive parent when they realize they’re in over their heads and they choose to disrupt the adoption (it happens ALL THE TIME).
As for infants, in the united states there are FAR more couples who want to adopt than there are babies to go around. Infants in the united states (unless they are minority or special needs) are NOT in need of homes. It’s just not true that you’re "saving " a baby by adopting him. Chances are there are at least 10 families clamoring for the chance to parent him!
We might have an obligation to care for widows and orphans, but that is NOT the same thing as adopting them. If you enter adoption without the right mindset and preparation, you are GOING to hurt a child, or get hurt yourself. It’s just a fact.