do you have to be Catholic to get into Heaven??

  • Thread starter Thread starter distracted
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Answer; The Catholic Church. That was tough. Again, no denying the Catholic Church was first, but first doesn’t mean the only true church.
Admitting first is admitting Christ’s passing of the keys to Peter. Does it not follow then based on your statement that any other church after was not begun by Christ … in persona. What qualifies as “true”?
Many thanks for the Catholic church in getting the ball rolling and spreading the gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
I find this a bit flippant because the spreading of the Gospel in the early Church was bloody … it was on the bodies of the early martyrs that these truths were passed. It took the lives of all the Apostles … save one.
However, since then, many other denominations on the Protestant side have done the same thing as the Catholic church did back then.
If they are doing the same thing why the different denominations? I agree that Protesants are great evangelists.
So are the Protestants who are teaching the same truth that the Catholic church teaches any less saved then those in the Catholic church? NO!
Christ saves whom he will save but to say that Protestants teach the same truth is inaccurate. It is obvious that they are distinct disagreements about what Christ taught.
Again any church that teaches and preaches the truth of the Gospels is the true church.
While this sounds nice it cannot be true. We may have the same goal but if what we preach conflicts then one cannot be true. Again I am not singling out individuals within those denominations but how can truth be divided.
Catholics and Protestants united for Christ. WOW, that would be great!
It would be since we do have a common enemy.
 
If I am united to Christ by faith through the work of the Spirit, does it matter if I do not agree with the Catholic view of the Eucharist, or receive the Pope as the vicar of Christ, or have a different view on divorce? These are not gospel issues according to the Scriptures. I cannot believe in what I don’t believe. Do I believe in another gospel (Gal 1)?
Sorry Ada,m, these are Gospel issues , it seems so, about the Gospel content that is. Carlan
 
I honestly don’t believe the Catholic Church is the first church. Old Testament Saints are part of the body of Christ (Hebrews and Revelation) saved by the person and work of Christ. The universal body of Christ consists of all sinners that God has redeemed throughout redemptive history based upon the blood of Christ. We worship the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. There is a remnant saved by grace in every generation which started after the fall of mankind. Those who makeup the remnant saved by grace were chosen before the foundation of the world to believe in Christ in an effectual way. That is the biblical truth.

Galatians 3:8

And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, “In you shall all the nations be blessed.”
 
Sorry Ada,m, these are Gospel issues , it seems so, about the Gospel content that is. Carlan
Do you think that I believe in a different gospel (Gal 1) under the curse of God? I believe that the Mormon gospel is a different gospel under the curse of God.

No Other Gospel

I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel—not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.

For am I now seeking the approval of man, or of God? Or am I trying to please man? If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ.
 
Sorry Ada,m, these are Gospel issues , it seems so, about the Gospel content that is. Carlan
Originally Posted by 2nd Adam
If I am united to Christ by faith through the work of the Spirit, does ***it matter if I do not agree with the Catholic view of the Eucharist, or receive the Pope as the vicar of Christ, or have a different view on divorce? These are not gospel issues according to the Scriptures. I cannot believe in what I don’t believe. Do I believe in another gospel (Gal 1)? ***

If you do not believe in what our Lord gave to us at the last supper is the Eucharist, Or that he did not give Peter the keys to the kingdom to guide his church. If you believe divorce is o,k. all of which are part of the Gospel, Well, I would say you are following your own interpretation of the Scripture.
Adam believing in only 80% of what Jesus passed on to his Church through the Apostles.means you are missing 100%of the truth. It is up to you if you wish to reject it and believe only part of it. Only God judges our hearts. I’m not hear to judge you. Only to share the whole truth with those wish it. Carlan
. Carlan
 
Admitting first is admitting Christ’s passing of the keys to Peter. Does it not follow then based on your statement that any other church after was not begun by Christ … in persona. What qualifies as “true”?
I find this a bit flippant because the spreading of the Gospel in the early Church was bloody … it was on the bodies of the early martyrs that these truths were passed. It took the lives of all the Apostles … save one.
If they are doing the same thing why the different denominations? I agree that Protesants are great evangelists.
Christ saves whom he will save but to say that Protestants teach the same truth is inaccurate. It is obvious that they are distinct disagreements about what Christ taught.While this sounds nice it cannot be true. We may have the same goal but if what we preach conflicts then one cannot be true. Again I am not singling out individuals within those denominations but how can truth be divided.
It would be since we do have a common enemy.
Please give me distinct differences on what Christ taught between Catholics and Protestants. I believe the truths of the Holy Bible are what is to be adhered to. My background is Protestant, but I don’t believe in divorse (Jesus was pretty to the point on this issue), I don’t believe in abortion (The Father made sure this was included in the Ten Commandments), and I believe that the flesh and blood of Christ is the bread and wine during Holy Communion. However many will say that when Christ made the statement you must eat of my flesh and of my blood, that he was in fact referring to the last supper that was to come in the future (not the literal eating of his flesh and blood), yet no one present when he made the statement would realize this until they actually took part in this with Christ Jesus. The direct and to the point statement was made to weed out those who didn’t really understand the true meaning of our saviors statement, thus the teaching was too hard to accept for those who didn’t really cling to Christ as the true Messiah. You have to love the great response from the twelve disciples, when Christ asked them if they would leave. They knew Christ was who he said he was. They didn’t deny the miracles that Jesus performed. You really have to look at that and wonder. Then later Jesus says, “this bread is my body and this wine is my blood. Do this as often as you eat and drink of it in remembrance of me”. Did he mean that it was his literal body and blood or did he institute the last supper as a way that we would never forget the great sacrifice he made for all of us (a ceremony to remember his great sacrifice)? Or is it both? This is the mystery of Holy Communion. If we as Protestants say it just represents the sacrifice of Christ, but it doesn’t really turn into his flesh and blood, Catholics will say we are wrong. Protestants on the other hand will say either it is a great unexplained mystery (Lutherans) or that Holy Communion is the partaking of wine that represents Christ’s blood (not literal blood) and bread that represents the body of Christ (not literally his flesh) in memory of the great sacrifice Christ gave for all our sins (Baptist). In the end we all remember and honor the great sacrifice Jesus Christ gave for us all. What is the truth? So please tell me some of the differences of Christ’s teachings between Protestant and Catholic interpretations that I don’t know?

Take Care and May God Bless us all!

Ed
 
Dear ronin,

Thank you for a nice response, from the heart 🙂
First though, I am a female :D, just wanted to clear that up! 😃

you state
The bottom line; Pride of the Catholic Church refuses to accept Protestants as equals in Christ becuase they believe they are the one true church because they were the first Christian Church and Pride on the Protestant side refuses to bow down to Catholic Doctrine that doesn’t always go stricly by the scripture (Protestants still don’t get the excessive elevation of Mother Mary and some of the other practices). So how do we fix it my fellow man in Christ??? Keep the division or come to a ageement as long as the truth of the scripture is preached, per the Holy Bible?
That which I bolded is an opinion, and cannot be proven.

Second, there is NO pride in the Catholic Church when stated that it is the ONE true Church. Yes, of course that sounds prideful, my friend and I always discuss this and think, the last thing we want to sound like is prideful! Yikes!
I think it is just the opposite, it is humility that one needs to truly say to someone that the Catholic Church is the one true Church. The FULNESS of Truth lies within the Catholic Church. That is the difference. Yes, some Protestant denominations hold truths, but we have the fullness.

Third, the Catholic Church does not NOT accept Protestants and their belief and love for Christ. Infact, many times it is said how passionate Protestants are for their love of Him. We are all brothers and sisters in Christ, Christianity. But, we cannot, CANNOT be equal in that Protestants MISS the important and CENTER of the faith which is the Eucharist, as well as the sacrament of confession, Mary the Mother of God (which this to me always baffles my mind, she is His mother, the closest person to a Son is the mother! She is an intermediary, not God, but what a nice gift God gave us to go to her to seek extra help!)

Anyway, Just like we need food to live and be heathy physically, we NEED food-the Bread of Life, to nourish us spiritually. No food for the soul = a soul that slowly dies.
Christ didnt institute the Eucharist as a symbol, otherwise He would have said to all those who ran away at the thought “Hey wait! Im just kidding, its only a symbol!”
In John 6:53 Jesus said: “Unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood you will not have life in you.” Of course, He did not mean to cut off salvation from those who through no fault of their own do not know or grasp this truth. It is like the case of Baptism: one must receive it if one knows.

In John 6:47-67 Jesus did not soften His words about His presence even when so many no longer went with Him: had He meant only that bread and wine would signify Him, He could have so easily explained that, and they would not have left.
The Church has always understood a Real Presence. For example, St. Ignatius of Antioch, who was eaten by the beasts in Rome around 107 A.D., wrote: “The Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ” (To Smyrna 7:1). St. Justin the martyr wrote around 145 A. D: “We have been taught that the food is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh” (Apology 1. 66. 2). The Council of Trent in 1551 defined that Jesus is really present in the Eucharist, body and blood, soul and divinity.

But yes, this is not the topic, the topic is salvation, and yes, we do not know, and will never know who will truly be saved outside of the Catholic Church. Heck, we have so many lukewarm Catholics that are going to have problems receiving Eternal Salvation.
However, the division lies in that Protestants do not believe anything outside of Scripture, which is very hard to swallow for us Catholics. Especially since God can do anything, Faith and the Holy Spirit, I mean, you have to have faith my friend to believe in tradition, Apostolic Succession, The Eucharist, Our beloved Mother of Christ, and Confession.
Us Catholics, deep in the faith, do not hold all of this just as a MEANS for salvation, above that is Love. All of this IS LOVE. A Road Map to Eternal Life.
All of this, all that we believe Christ left us and taught us is Love, to better ourselves, to journey though this world to our eternal home.
To receive the Lord in the Eucharist, is THE SOURCE of life for us, so yes, we will have to have division.

Christ has only One Church, and there cannot be 2 ronin, yes the same Bible and scripture may be used, BUT each Protestant church has its own interpretation. There is NO order, there is division. Yes there is love, of course, and full of people who mean well, of course! praise God. But tell me ronin, who leads the Protestant church? Where can I find the “way” in the Protestant church? I dont want the Baptist way, or the Evangelical Way, or the Presbyterian way, I want the one solid, specific way.

The Protestant church does not have that. Each 30000+ my friend, has something different from the next, that is why there are so many.
Christ did not come to unite, but to divide. Mother against daughter, father against son, all for Him, to follow his ways and repent and convert.
Praying and confessing our sins to God in our homes, and leading 'good lives (which who by the way says it is good, according to what?) and believing in Scripture is not enough.
Christ would not have come for that, everyone was doing that before Christ came!

Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the road is easy that leads to destruction, and there are many who take it. For the gate is narrow and the road is hard that leads to life, and there are few who find it. Mathew 7:13-15

Good dialogue ronin, I appreciate this discussion!
have a wonderful afternoon,
God bless
 
Originally Posted by 2nd Adam
If I am united to Christ by faith through the work of the Spirit, does ***it matter if I do not agree with the Catholic view of the Eucharist, or receive the Pope as the vicar of Christ, or have a different view on divorce? These are not gospel issues according to the Scriptures. I cannot believe in what I don’t believe. Do I believe in another gospel (Gal 1)? ***

If you do not believe in what our Lord gave to us at the last supper is the Eucharist, Or that he did not give Peter the keys to the kingdom to guide his church. If you believe divorce is o,k. all of which are part of the Gospel, Well, I would say you are following your own interpretation of the Scripture.
Adam believing in only 80% of what Jesus passed on to his Church through the Apostles.means you are missing 100%of the truth. It is up to you if you wish to reject it all. Carlan
The Apostle Paul revealed that we all know in part. If knowing 100% of the truth is necessary for salvation, then Heaven will only consists of the presence of God. As a Christian in good conscience, if I do not believe in the Catholic understanding of communion, or understand Matthew 16 in the way Catholics do, how can I believe it? I never posted that divorce is okay. I think you need to seperate gospel issues in which the Apostles preached from other issues, and you might see things differently in another light.

Love never ends. As for prophecies, they will pass away; as for tongues, they will cease; as for knowledge, it will pass away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part, but when the perfect comes, the partial will pass away. When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways. For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I have been fully known. So now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; but the greatest of these is love. - Paul
 
I honestly don’t believe the Catholic Church is the first church. Old Testament Saints are part of the body of Christ (Hebrews and Revelation) saved by the person and work of Christ. The universal body of Christ consists of all sinners that God has redeemed throughout redemptive history based upon the blood of Christ. We worship the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. There is a remnant saved by grace in every generation which started after the fall of mankind. Those who makeup the remnant saved by grace were chosen before the foundation of the world to believe in Christ in an effectual way. That is the biblical truth.

Galatians 3:8

And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, “In you shall all the nations be blessed.”
My friend in Christ, your above passages speak the truth of scripture. Thank you!

Take Care and May Christ be with you always!

Ed
 
hello 2ndAdam
“The wall is no longer necessary… For this reason Luther’s phrase: “faith alone” is true…” Pope Benedict XVI
You quote this above in your signature, it would be nice to see the whole sentence, and not … this looks good…now I am justified in my Protestant beliefs!..
We all know what Benedict said, you just dont want to hear it, and want to lead others astray. But this is for another room.

God bless
 
The Apostle Paul revealed that we all know in part. If knowing 100% of the truth is necessary for salvation, then Heaven will only consists of the presence of God. As a Christian in good conscience, if I do not believe in the Catholic understanding of communion, or understand Matthew 16 in the way Catholics do, how can I believe it? I never posted that divorce is okay. I think you need to seperate gospel issues in which the Apostles preached from other issues, and you might see things differently in another light.

I am simply saying to you what Jesus commissioned the Apostoles to pass down to us. You either accept it all or you don’t . God in the end will do the juudging for us , up or down.
I’ve said it before, Adam, as much as we love Paul, it is what Jesus said, what He gave to his Apostoles to pass on to us. Again God will judge you about what you believe or do not believe,not you,not me or any one else Only God.
I tend to say good luck to both of us,;)😃 but instead i will say the right thing ,I’ll be praying for both of us. G’afternoon, Carlan
 
What is the truth?
Same question as Pilate … is not that what we all search for? The truth is never comfortable.
So please tell me some of the differences of Christ’s teachings between Protestant and Catholic interpretations that I don’t know?
I don’t know what you do or don’t know but that does not really matter. You know the Eucharist question separates us but I will put it in stark terms.

I find the Eucharist question … THE question … one of life and death … did Jesus mean for us to consume him … his real flesh and blood. If he did then it has to be supremely important if he did not then well we are free to believe what we want to believe.

If Catholics are wrong about the Eucharist then we are nothing but a bunch of bread worshipping pagans because we believe it IS Jesus … not a symbol, no matter how holy a symbol of Jesus. If Catholics are right then to not do as Christ commanded is mutiny. The fulcrum of the Catholic Church is the Eucharist and for me one must say … I believe … I believe but do not understand or I don’t believe.

The truth stood right in front of Pilate and he could not see it.
 
hello 2ndAdam

You quote this above in your signature, it would be nice to see the whole sentence, and not … this looks good…now I am justified in my Protestant beliefs!..
We all know what Benedict said, you just dont want to hear it, and want to lead others astray. But this is for another room.

God bless
My intention is that you read both of my links in the entire context. 😉
 
These are the Vicars of Christ making infallible statements:

Pope Boniface VIII in his Papal Bull Unam Sanctam (A.D. 1302): “We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff.”

Pope Benedict XV (A.D. 1914 - 1922): “Such is the nature of the Catholic faith that it does not admit of more or less, but must be held as a whole, or as a whole rejected: This is the Catholic faith, which unless a man believe faithfully and firmly, he cannot be saved.” (Encyclical, Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum)

Pope Eugene IV and the Council of Florence (A.D. 1438 - 1445): “[The most Holy Roman Church] firmly believes, professes, and proclaims that those not living within the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews and heretics and schismatics cannot become participants in eternal life, but will depart `into everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels’ (Matt. 25:41), unless before the end of life the same have been added to the flock;…”

**Here is what the Church says today: **catholic.com/library/Salvation_Outside_the_Church.asp

“The Church in this world is the sacrament of salvation, the sign and the instrument of the communion of God and men” (CCC 780).

"Many people misunderstand the nature of this teaching.

Indifferentists, going to one extreme, claim that it makes no difference what church one belongs to. Certain radical traditionalists, going to the other extreme, claim that unless one is a full-fledged, baptized member of the Catholic Church, one will be damned."

Is catholic.com saying that Popes Boniface, Benedict XV and Eugene speaking infallibly are radical traditionalists? Notice when they are quoting popes, saints and doctors they omit Boniface, Eugene and Benedict XV.
Do those Popes say that “unless one is a full-fledged, baptized member of the CC one will be damned”? I didn’t see that in any of their writings.
 
No, it’s not the same as “willingly ignorant”…and definitely not the same as “dumb on purpose.” Firstly, “ignorant” and “dumb” are not the same. Dumb–there’s just no hope for you. You can’t fix it. :sad_yes:
Ignorant: just get educated!

So what does “invincibly ignorant” about the CC mean? It means that:
-no one has ever taught you
-you were taught but didn’t get it
-you were taught but taught incorrectly

So, someone who says, “I know what the CC teaches and I disagree” but cannot articulate the CC’s teaching on artificial contraception, cannot cite the Scriptural verses for the CC’s teaching on the Eucharist, cannot expound on why the Divine Liturgy is a sacrifice, has no idea where the liturgical prayers are in Scripture, does not know what the ECFs taught on the papacy, cannot provide Scriptural references for the 7 sacraments…etc etc etc…IS invincibly ignorant.
I was just curious… I might have mentioned it, but I didn’t grow up speaking English…
Invincibly ignorant sounded like another formula that has way more meaning behind it than simply the sum of the meanings of the words.
On another note:
Just curious, Janet…

You posted on another thread :
40.png
Janet1983:
… I joined on the 26th of September 2007 and I got saved after that date… So when I joined I was still Catholic.
Just curious: what is the significance of the “1983” in your username? (I thought I read in one of your posts that the “1983” indicated the date you were “saved”).

Nope… that’s actually when I was born into a small neat community with less than 1% Protestants and almost everybody being related to each other (by blood and/or by marriage)…
 
If I am united to Christ by faith through the work of the Spirit, does it matter if I do not agree with the Catholic view of the Eucharist, or receive the Pope as the vicar of Christ, or have a different view on divorce?
Does it matter if you tell Christ, “I don’t believe what you said about eating Your flesh and drinking Your blood.”? Does it matter if you tell Christ, “I know you said that if I divorce someone and marry another I commit adultery, but I just don’t agree with you, Lord.”

I wouldn’t dare tell my Lord that face to face.
These are not gospel issues according to the Scriptures.
What do you mean “these are not gospel issues”? Do you mean they are not “essential” doctrines?

If that’s what you mean, then where does Scripture give us a list of what’s an “essential” doctrine?
 
This statement can be revised to fit Catholic Christians too based on Catholic theology.

“It says that Christians from various Catholic communities have the possibility of eternal life. It has never said that being a member of the Catholic Church is definitively a ticket to heaven”. - Revised by Adam
Not sure what your point is here, Adam. :confused:
 
Maybe one day our pride will allow us to recognize each other as true children of God

Take Care and May the Peace of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ be with us all.

Ed
The CC *does *recognize you as a true child of God, Ed. No need to put the “maybe” in there!
no matter what denomination we serve in as long as the truth of the Holy Bible is adhered to.
Therein lies the rub, Ed. What “truth of the Holy Bible” is adhered to? Is the Eucharist the body/blood/soul and divinity of Christ, or is it not? Is it ok to divorce and re-marry, or is it not? There’s 40,000 different denominations now, all claiming to proclaim the “truth of the Holy Bible”, but teaching contradictory doctrines.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top