Donald Trump's war on Megyn Kelly

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Respectfully, I would not forget that the Spanish language has words in it as well, to describe people, one word beginning with the word “G”, which I think we might be able to guess, another beginning with the word “M”.

Sure, in an ideal world, we should be helping most anyone we can.

I think someone from Argentina contributed to a thread that sometimes, when you try to accommodate everyone, everyone ends up losing, it be clinics where everyone goes, hospitals and so on, people start being packed in like Cattle.

Perhaps if the pro-amnesty crowd wants to make compromises as politics consists of, some conservative values likewise, could be implemented.

I do think some of the bills out there for at least, giving residency, don’t sound that bad, stay out of trouble, don’t use public assistance, there can be some merits to consider.
 
_Abyssinia said:
Surely that interview Megyn Kelly did though, doesn’t mean it is warranted that she is called a bimbo or other names though?.
Click to expand...
I disagree. I think the interview of her on the Stern show, does show that she is a raunchy bimbo. And her questions to Mr. Trump were unfair and unprofessional since she misquoted what he actually had said.
 
American Catholic leaders are hoping that President Obama’s meeting with Pope Francis at the Vatican on Thursday will strengthen his resolve to soften U.S. policy on deportations, and that the pontiff’s call for compassion toward migrants will also bolster the prospects for immigration reform, now stalled in Congress.
Click to expand...
Church officials have staged several high-profile events to reinforce the pope’s message. On Wednesday, a delegation led by Los Angeles Archbishop José Gomez brought the young daughter of a man facing deportation to meet the pope at the Vatican. Next week, a group of bishops led by Boston’s Cardinal Sean O’Malley will visit the U.S.-Mexican border and celebrate Mass for migrants in Nogales, Mexico.
Click to expand...
Suppose the election came down to Trump versus Hillary? It seems that the Catholic officials have grave reservations with both of them. In such a case, whom does a Catholic vote for?
 
Tomdstone said:
Suppose the election came down to Trump versus Hillary? It seems that the Catholic officials have grave reservations with both of them. In such a case, whom does a Catholic vote for?
Click to expand...
I would happily pull the lever for Trump. I think Trump is the GOP’s answer to Hillary and this misogynistic rhetoric is just from people who are banking on this being about Pro woman/ vs the nasty ol GOP sexist. Anyone who is reading into this issue is really falling for this debate of are you for women or against.

Personally the GOP should run a woman against Hillary but Fiorina just cant seem to cut it and the other pickings are slim. It could be that Hillary is not the candidate but I think she will be. Trump is a good candidate to run against her unless we let the media control it and have it be the Riggs/ Billie Jean King election.
 
Tomdstone said:
Suppose the election came down to Trump versus Hillary? It seems that the Catholic officials have grave reservations with both of them. In such a case, whom does a Catholic vote for?
Click to expand...
That would be a tough call - especially since Trump only recently “converted” from pro-“choice” to pro-life, though again, he’s more in that mushy middle ground on abortion, as are most Americans . In fact, part of the reason why the pro-life/pro-“choice” numbers fluctuate so much is that really only about 15% are hard-core, no exceptions, pro-life and only about 15% are hard-core, any-reason-any-time pro-“choice”. Most people fall somewhere in the middle of the pro-life/pro-“choice” spectrum, with some people on that spectrum claiming to be pro-life, some pro-“choice”, and often not much difference between those calling themselves pro-life and pro-“choice” if their views aren’t fully on one side or the other. Seriously - many “pro-lifers” don’t object to first-term abortions (not to mention abortions done due to rape, incest, or fetal “anomaly”), while many “pro-choicers” object to second-term abortions (and the vast majority object to third-term abortions). This is part of the reason why PP (I refuse to state their whole name) is so successful. They can claim that “they only perform 1st trimester abortions” (even though they continue to lobby for abortion to remain legal through all nine months of pregnancy, up until the point of birth). They claim that only 3% of their income comes from abortions, but that just counts the appointments for the abortions itself - and does not count the multiple appointments that they make with “abortion-minded women” prior to the abortions. In addition, due to their huge influence in schools, they are the first people that high school and college-aged students think about when they are contemplating sexual activity. The reason why PP is so well-protected (and actually one of the most well-known and well-accepted organizations in the US) is due to their continuous brainwashing of high schoolers and college students.

But that’s a rant. Donald Trump vs. Hillary… Trump is (currently) nominally pro-life, while Hillary is staunchly pro-abortion. Both, I believe, support same-sex “marriage”. And in my opinion, both would be a disaster for the country. If forced between Trump and Hillary, depending on my state (as some states only have space for “write-in” candidates if there are official “write-in” candidates), I would either vote 3rd party or write in “My Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ”.
 
Tomdstone said:
Suppose the election came down to Trump versus Hillary? It seems that the Catholic officials have grave reservations with both of them. In such a case, whom does a Catholic vote for?
Click to expand...
Trump. But I’d have to take a long shower after I got back from the polling place
 
Well done Trump for helping Megan Kelly’s ratings.

It has crossed my mind at times, some of this is almost like political stunts to get attention but I know that is not the case.
 
estesbob said:
He retweets a comment calling Megan Kelly a Bimbo . And people want this man to be the next president of United States ?
Click to expand...
Well, for me it boils down to the non-negotiables, not what someone says on twitter unrelted to those.

Trump’s comments against Kelly are not nice, and I’m thinking this will start to hurt him. It’s getting old.

Somehow, I hope Walker can pull this out.
 
Tomdstone said:
Suppose the election came down to Trump versus Hillary? It seems that the Catholic officials have grave reservations with both of them. In such a case, whom does a Catholic vote for?
Click to expand...
Grave reservations? :confused: The choice should be obvious. Trump is way more pro-life.

I just want someone with solid Catholic values (they don’t have to be Catholic) who can win.
 
powerofk said:
That would be a tough call - especially since Trump only recently “converted” from pro-“choice” to pro-life, though again, he’s more in that mushy middle ground on abortion, as are most Americans . In fact, part of the reason why the pro-life/pro-“choice” numbers fluctuate so much is that really only about 15% are hard-core, no exceptions, pro-life and only about 15% are hard-core, any-reason-any-time pro-“choice”. Most people fall somewhere in the middle of the pro-life/pro-“choice” spectrum, with some people on that spectrum claiming to be pro-life, some pro-“choice”, and often not much difference between those calling themselves pro-life and pro-“choice” if their views aren’t fully on one side or the other. Seriously - many “pro-lifers” don’t object to first-term abortions (not to mention abortions done due to rape, incest, or fetal “anomaly”), while many “pro-choicers” object to second-term abortions (and the vast majority object to third-term abortions). This is part of the reason why PP (I refuse to state their whole name) is so successful. They can claim that “they only perform 1st trimester abortions” (even though they continue to lobby for abortion to remain legal through all nine months of pregnancy, up until the point of birth). They claim that only 3% of their income comes from abortions, but that just counts the appointments for the abortions itself - and does not count the multiple appointments that they make with “abortion-minded women” prior to the abortions. In addition, due to their huge influence in schools, they are the first people that high school and college-aged students think about when they are contemplating sexual activity. The reason why PP is so well-protected (and actually one of the most well-known and well-accepted organizations in the US) is due to their continuous brainwashing of high schoolers and college students.

But that’s a rant. Donald Trump vs. Hillary… Trump is (currently) nominally pro-life, while Hillary is staunchly pro-abortion. Both, I believe, support same-sex “marriage”. And in my opinion, both would be a disaster for the country. If forced between Trump and Hillary, depending on my state (as some states only have space for “write-in” candidates if there are official “write-in” candidates), I would either vote 3rd party or write in “My Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ”.
Click to expand...
I saw a preliminary proof of Hillary’s bumperstickers and signs for the GE. They say “Vote Hillary, Or Third Party. Either way I thank you for your support!”

It’s a long bumpersticker Perhaps she can trim it down to just emojis
 
SuperLuigi said:
Well, for me it boils down to the non-negotiables, not what someone says on twitter unrelted to those.

Trump’s comments against Kelly are not nice, and I’m thinking this will start to hurt him. It’s getting old.

Somehow, I hope Walker can pull this out.
Click to expand...
Walker’d probably be my 2nd or 3rd choice. My fave right now is Rubio.

But seriously, as an Indy, it doesn’t matter, cuz I have to take what’s given to me.

🤷
 
SuperLuigi said:
Grave reservations? :confused: The choice should be obvious. Trump is way more pro-life.

I just want someone with solid Catholic values (they don’t have to be Catholic) who can win.
Click to expand...
So is calling women bimbos Catholic values ? Is calling for the Forced deportation of 11 million people Catholic values? Of course Trumps “Values” have changed several times over the last seven years but I would still vote for him over Hillary but I would feel quite soiled after doing so
 
Hoosier_Daddy said:
I saw a preliminary proof of Hillary’s bumperstickers and signs for the GE. They say “Vote Hillary, Or Third Party. Either way I thank you for your support!”

It’s a long bumpersticker Perhaps she can trim it down to just emojis
Click to expand...
Honestly, for me, it’d be either that or refusing to vote if it were the two of them. So, yeah, if it comes down to Hillary vs. Trump, I’d be readying for the cataclysm.
 
SuperLuigi said:
Well, for me it boils down to the non-negotiables, not what someone says on twitter unrelted to those.

Trump’s comments against Kelly are not nice, and I’m thinking this will start to hurt him. It’s getting old.

Somehow, I hope Walker can pull this out.
Click to expand...
I like Governor Walker but he hasn’t been on the ball when he has been asked a few things, he is still one of my top choices but one can watch Governor Christie talk, it’s all so natural, it’s the same way with Governor Kasich, good answers by both.

I think Walker has been such a Public Servant and working for the Conservative cause that when he’s asked things on immigration or Iran, it sounds a bit prepared, he may be the best man of them all but he needs to express himself better.
 
estesbob said:
So is calling women bimbos Catholic values ? Is calling for the Forced deportation of 11 million people Catholic values? Of course Trumps “Values” have changed several times over the last seven years but I would still vote for him over Hillary but I would feel quite soiled after doing so
Click to expand...
No, they aren’t Catholic values, are all of our responses “Catholic Values”?

For myself, no.
 
Hoosier_Daddy said:
I saw a preliminary proof of Hillary’s bumperstickers and signs for the GE. They say “Vote Hillary, Or Third Party. Either way I thank you for your support!”

It’s a long bumpersticker Perhaps she can trim it down to just emojis
Click to expand...
This may be so.

But I’m not altogether positive a 3rd party would lose. Perot got 18, 19%. Trump likely could get more than that and possibly, quite a bit more. If it were a 3-way with Bush, Clinton, Trump, if Trump wanted to really win it, I think it may be possible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top